{"title":"优化癌症治疗中的肿瘤消除回报","authors":"Nigel J. Burroughs, Mathilde L. C. Leuridan","doi":"10.1049/cth2.12701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new payoff function is proposed for cancer treatment optimisation, the tumour elimination payoff (TEP), that incorporates the increase in lifespan if tumour elimination is achieved. The TEP is discounted by drug toxicity and by potential risks, such as metastasis and mutation. An approximation is used for the probability of tumour elimination, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$e^{-\\alpha N(T)}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, giving a terminal payoff with an exponential dependence on the final tumour size <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$N(T)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The optimal solutions for this payoff for simple tumour growth models, (logistic and Gompertz growth), are determined. Using Pontryagin's maximum principle it is proved that bang–bang optimal solutions exist with a single switch; specifically delayed treatment and treat-and-stop solutions at maximum tolerated dose (MTD) exist. There is also a singular arc with constant tumour size. Solutions either have a high probability, respectively, low probability of tumour elimination; these correspond to a post-treatment high probability of cure, and a high probability of relapse, respectively. Optimising over the time horizon <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <annotation>$T$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> results in solutions that are either MTD throughout or no treatment, that is, treatment is either beneficial or detrimental. For the logistic growth model, the treatment benefit phase diagram is derived with respect to the patient's expected increase in lifespan and tumour size.</p>","PeriodicalId":50382,"journal":{"name":"IET Control Theory and Applications","volume":"18 13","pages":"1621-1637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cth2.12701","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising the tumour elimination payoff in cancer therapy\",\"authors\":\"Nigel J. Burroughs, Mathilde L. C. Leuridan\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/cth2.12701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new payoff function is proposed for cancer treatment optimisation, the tumour elimination payoff (TEP), that incorporates the increase in lifespan if tumour elimination is achieved. The TEP is discounted by drug toxicity and by potential risks, such as metastasis and mutation. An approximation is used for the probability of tumour elimination, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mi>α</mi>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>T</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$e^{-\\\\alpha N(T)}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, giving a terminal payoff with an exponential dependence on the final tumour size <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>T</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$N(T)$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. The optimal solutions for this payoff for simple tumour growth models, (logistic and Gompertz growth), are determined. Using Pontryagin's maximum principle it is proved that bang–bang optimal solutions exist with a single switch; specifically delayed treatment and treat-and-stop solutions at maximum tolerated dose (MTD) exist. There is also a singular arc with constant tumour size. Solutions either have a high probability, respectively, low probability of tumour elimination; these correspond to a post-treatment high probability of cure, and a high probability of relapse, respectively. Optimising over the time horizon <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>T</mi>\\n <annotation>$T$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> results in solutions that are either MTD throughout or no treatment, that is, treatment is either beneficial or detrimental. For the logistic growth model, the treatment benefit phase diagram is derived with respect to the patient's expected increase in lifespan and tumour size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Control Theory and Applications\",\"volume\":\"18 13\",\"pages\":\"1621-1637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cth2.12701\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Control Theory and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cth2.12701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Control Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cth2.12701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
针对癌症治疗优化提出了一种新的回报函数--肿瘤消除回报(TEP),它包含了实现肿瘤消除后寿命的延长。TEP 会因药物毒性以及转移和突变等潜在风险而打折扣。肿瘤消除概率采用近似值 e - α N ( T ) $e^{-\αN(T)}$,得出的最终报酬与最终肿瘤大小 N ( T ) $N(T)$呈指数关系。针对简单的肿瘤生长模型(逻辑生长和贡培兹生长),确定了这种报酬的最优解。利用庞特里亚金的最大值原理,证明了 "砰砰 "最优解存在于单一开关中;特别是存在最大耐受剂量(MTD)下的延迟治疗和治疗-停止解。此外,还存在肿瘤大小不变的奇异弧。这些方案分别对应于治疗后治愈的高概率和复发的高概率。在时间跨度 T $T$ 上进行优化的结果是,解决方案要么是全程 MTD,要么是不治疗,也就是说,治疗要么是有益的,要么是有害的。对于逻辑增长模型,可以根据患者预期寿命的延长和肿瘤的大小推导出治疗获益阶段图。
Optimising the tumour elimination payoff in cancer therapy
A new payoff function is proposed for cancer treatment optimisation, the tumour elimination payoff (TEP), that incorporates the increase in lifespan if tumour elimination is achieved. The TEP is discounted by drug toxicity and by potential risks, such as metastasis and mutation. An approximation is used for the probability of tumour elimination, , giving a terminal payoff with an exponential dependence on the final tumour size . The optimal solutions for this payoff for simple tumour growth models, (logistic and Gompertz growth), are determined. Using Pontryagin's maximum principle it is proved that bang–bang optimal solutions exist with a single switch; specifically delayed treatment and treat-and-stop solutions at maximum tolerated dose (MTD) exist. There is also a singular arc with constant tumour size. Solutions either have a high probability, respectively, low probability of tumour elimination; these correspond to a post-treatment high probability of cure, and a high probability of relapse, respectively. Optimising over the time horizon results in solutions that are either MTD throughout or no treatment, that is, treatment is either beneficial or detrimental. For the logistic growth model, the treatment benefit phase diagram is derived with respect to the patient's expected increase in lifespan and tumour size.
期刊介绍:
IET Control Theory & Applications is devoted to control systems in the broadest sense, covering new theoretical results and the applications of new and established control methods. Among the topics of interest are system modelling, identification and simulation, the analysis and design of control systems (including computer-aided design), and practical implementation. The scope encompasses technological, economic, physiological (biomedical) and other systems, including man-machine interfaces.
Most of the papers published deal with original work from industrial and government laboratories and universities, but subject reviews and tutorial expositions of current methods are welcomed. Correspondence discussing published papers is also welcomed.
Applications papers need not necessarily involve new theory. Papers which describe new realisations of established methods, or control techniques applied in a novel situation, or practical studies which compare various designs, would be of interest. Of particular value are theoretical papers which discuss the applicability of new work or applications which engender new theoretical applications.