1680-1688 年英格兰的阴谋、会众、公司和商业:布林特里的爱德华-梅西的叙述

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
History Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1111/1468-229X.13417
EDWARD LEGON
{"title":"1680-1688 年英格兰的阴谋、会众、公司和商业:布林特里的爱德华-梅西的叙述","authors":"EDWARD LEGON","doi":"10.1111/1468-229X.13417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1683, Edward Massey, an obscure office-holder in Braintree, Essex, provided the state with one of the most explosive accounts of conspiratorial activities in England during the so-called ‘Exclusion Crisis’. Massey, a prisoner in the King's Bench, named dozens of individuals in his native Essex, as well as the West Country and London, who apparently aired seditious grievances with King Charles II and his Roman Catholic brother and heir, James, Duke of York, and compassed participation in a national plot to ensure the succession of a Protestant in the form of Charles's illegitimate son, James, Duke of Monmouth. The colourful details of the alleged conspiracy bear reproduction in this article. Nevertheless, the difficulty of crediting the most radical implications of Massey's narratives calls for a cautious assessment of their reliability and value to historians. Fortunately, additional evidence enables us to treat Massey's account as a detailed testimony of how those marginalised by the Stuarts’ post-Restoration settlements were able to mobilise behind and sustain their discontents, and the anxious secrecy and cautious trust which, amid heightened state surveillance, defined their encounters. Moreover, the article demonstrates how necessarily secretive political and religious networks mapped onto, and drew strength from, bonds which were forged in experiences of parochial administration and business, particularly the production of and trade in cloth. The result is an account of the Restoration's ‘politics of religion’ which highlights the communicative and ideological importance of the politics of local office and (inter)national trade.</p>","PeriodicalId":13162,"journal":{"name":"History","volume":"109 386-387","pages":"226-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-229X.13417","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conspiracy, Congregation, Company, and Commerce in England, 1680–1688: The Narratives of Edward Massey of Braintree\",\"authors\":\"EDWARD LEGON\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-229X.13417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In 1683, Edward Massey, an obscure office-holder in Braintree, Essex, provided the state with one of the most explosive accounts of conspiratorial activities in England during the so-called ‘Exclusion Crisis’. Massey, a prisoner in the King's Bench, named dozens of individuals in his native Essex, as well as the West Country and London, who apparently aired seditious grievances with King Charles II and his Roman Catholic brother and heir, James, Duke of York, and compassed participation in a national plot to ensure the succession of a Protestant in the form of Charles's illegitimate son, James, Duke of Monmouth. The colourful details of the alleged conspiracy bear reproduction in this article. Nevertheless, the difficulty of crediting the most radical implications of Massey's narratives calls for a cautious assessment of their reliability and value to historians. Fortunately, additional evidence enables us to treat Massey's account as a detailed testimony of how those marginalised by the Stuarts’ post-Restoration settlements were able to mobilise behind and sustain their discontents, and the anxious secrecy and cautious trust which, amid heightened state surveillance, defined their encounters. Moreover, the article demonstrates how necessarily secretive political and religious networks mapped onto, and drew strength from, bonds which were forged in experiences of parochial administration and business, particularly the production of and trade in cloth. The result is an account of the Restoration's ‘politics of religion’ which highlights the communicative and ideological importance of the politics of local office and (inter)national trade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History\",\"volume\":\"109 386-387\",\"pages\":\"226-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-229X.13417\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-229X.13417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-229X.13417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1683 年,埃塞克斯郡布林特里市一位默默无闻的官员爱德华-梅西(Edward Massey)向国家提供了所谓 "排外危机 "期间英格兰阴谋活动的最具爆炸性的描述之一。梅西是国王法庭的一名囚犯,他在自己的家乡埃塞克斯以及西部乡村和伦敦列举了数十人的名字,这些人显然对国王查理二世及其罗马天主教兄弟和继承人约克公爵詹姆斯表达了煽动性的不满,并参与了一项全国性的阴谋,以确保查理的私生子蒙茅斯公爵詹姆斯能够继承新教。本文将再现这一所谓阴谋的丰富细节。尽管如此,由于难以相信梅西叙述中最激进的含义,因此需要对其可靠性和对历史学家的价值进行谨慎的评估。幸运的是,有了更多的证据,我们可以将梅西的叙述作为一个详细的见证,说明那些被斯图亚特王朝复辟后的定居点边缘化的人是如何动员起来支持并维持他们的不满情绪的,以及在国家加强监控的情况下,他们的遭遇是如何通过焦虑的保密和谨慎的信任得以确定的。此外,文章还展示了隐秘的政治和宗教网络是如何映射到教区管理和商业经验(尤其是布匹生产和贸易)中形成的纽带并从中汲取力量的。文章对王政复辟时期的 "宗教政治 "进行了阐述,强调了地方行政和(国家)间贸易政治在交流和意识形态方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conspiracy, Congregation, Company, and Commerce in England, 1680–1688: The Narratives of Edward Massey of Braintree

In 1683, Edward Massey, an obscure office-holder in Braintree, Essex, provided the state with one of the most explosive accounts of conspiratorial activities in England during the so-called ‘Exclusion Crisis’. Massey, a prisoner in the King's Bench, named dozens of individuals in his native Essex, as well as the West Country and London, who apparently aired seditious grievances with King Charles II and his Roman Catholic brother and heir, James, Duke of York, and compassed participation in a national plot to ensure the succession of a Protestant in the form of Charles's illegitimate son, James, Duke of Monmouth. The colourful details of the alleged conspiracy bear reproduction in this article. Nevertheless, the difficulty of crediting the most radical implications of Massey's narratives calls for a cautious assessment of their reliability and value to historians. Fortunately, additional evidence enables us to treat Massey's account as a detailed testimony of how those marginalised by the Stuarts’ post-Restoration settlements were able to mobilise behind and sustain their discontents, and the anxious secrecy and cautious trust which, amid heightened state surveillance, defined their encounters. Moreover, the article demonstrates how necessarily secretive political and religious networks mapped onto, and drew strength from, bonds which were forged in experiences of parochial administration and business, particularly the production of and trade in cloth. The result is an account of the Restoration's ‘politics of religion’ which highlights the communicative and ideological importance of the politics of local office and (inter)national trade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History
History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: First published in 1912, History has been a leader in its field ever since. It is unique in its range and variety, packing its pages with stimulating articles and extensive book reviews. History balances its broad chronological coverage with a wide geographical spread of articles featuring contributions from social, political, cultural, economic and ecclesiastical historians. History seeks to publish articles on broad, challenging themes, which not only display sound scholarship which is embedded within current historiographical debates, but push those debates forward. History encourages submissions which are also attractively and clearly written. Reviews: An integral part of each issue is the review section giving critical analysis of the latest scholarship across an extensive chronological and geographical range.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信