持续气道正压对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成年患者认知功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"持续气道正压对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成年患者认知功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with the impairment of a range of cognitive functions. Whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves these cognitive functions is still a matter of debate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included OSA patients (apnea hypopnea index, AHI &gt;10/h), naive to CPAP treatment, with a cognitive assessment before and after CPAP initiation. We compared CPAP versus sham-CPAP or placebo tablet or dietary rules or no treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021275214).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven RCTs encompassing 923 OSA patients were included. For most of them, CPAP initiation was ≤3 months. A significant post-treatment improvement was found for the Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B; SMD = -0.93, 95 % CI = [-1.60, −0.25], Z = −2.70, <em>p</em> = 0.007), but not for the other neuropsychological assessments. No global effects on other cognitive domains (information processing speed, executive functions, working memory) were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The significant improvement in the TMT-B supports a short-term enhancement in cognitive flexibility with CPAP treatment. Further studies that take into account OSA comorbidities, cognitive profiles, a more diverse range of cognition assessments and include long-term evaluations are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with the impairment of a range of cognitive functions. Whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves these cognitive functions is still a matter of debate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included OSA patients (apnea hypopnea index, AHI &gt;10/h), naive to CPAP treatment, with a cognitive assessment before and after CPAP initiation. We compared CPAP versus sham-CPAP or placebo tablet or dietary rules or no treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021275214).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven RCTs encompassing 923 OSA patients were included. For most of them, CPAP initiation was ≤3 months. A significant post-treatment improvement was found for the Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B; SMD = -0.93, 95 % CI = [-1.60, −0.25], Z = −2.70, <em>p</em> = 0.007), but not for the other neuropsychological assessments. No global effects on other cognitive domains (information processing speed, executive functions, working memory) were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The significant improvement in the TMT-B supports a short-term enhancement in cognitive flexibility with CPAP treatment. Further studies that take into account OSA comorbidities, cognitive profiles, a more diverse range of cognition assessments and include long-term evaluations are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与一系列认知功能受损有关。方法我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些试验纳入了未接受 CPAP 治疗的 OSA 患者(呼吸暂停低通气指数,AHI >10/h),并在开始使用 CPAP 之前和之后进行了认知评估。我们比较了 CPAP 与假 CPAP、安慰剂片剂、饮食规则或不治疗的效果。本系统综述和荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO(ID CRD42021275214)上注册。其中大多数患者使用 CPAP 不超过 3 个月。研究发现,治疗后,患者的 "寻迹测试 B 部分"(TMT-B;SMD = -0.93,95 % CI = [-1.60, -0.25],Z = -2.70,p = 0.007)有明显改善,但其他神经心理评估结果则没有。结论 TMT-B 的显著改善支持了 CPAP 治疗对认知灵活性的短期增强。我们还需要进行更多的研究,这些研究应考虑到 OSA 合并症、认知概况、更多样化的认知评估,并包括长期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with the impairment of a range of cognitive functions. Whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves these cognitive functions is still a matter of debate.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included OSA patients (apnea hypopnea index, AHI >10/h), naive to CPAP treatment, with a cognitive assessment before and after CPAP initiation. We compared CPAP versus sham-CPAP or placebo tablet or dietary rules or no treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021275214).

Results

Eleven RCTs encompassing 923 OSA patients were included. For most of them, CPAP initiation was ≤3 months. A significant post-treatment improvement was found for the Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B; SMD = -0.93, 95 % CI = [-1.60, −0.25], Z = −2.70, p = 0.007), but not for the other neuropsychological assessments. No global effects on other cognitive domains (information processing speed, executive functions, working memory) were found.

Conclusion

The significant improvement in the TMT-B supports a short-term enhancement in cognitive flexibility with CPAP treatment. Further studies that take into account OSA comorbidities, cognitive profiles, a more diverse range of cognition assessments and include long-term evaluations are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信