头眼动态分析可解释 VOR 增益正常的眩晕患者的眼球运动

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
C. Orsini , A.M. Cedras , A. Sam Pierre , J. Dion , M. Maheu
{"title":"头眼动态分析可解释 VOR 增益正常的眩晕患者的眼球运动","authors":"C. Orsini ,&nbsp;A.M. Cedras ,&nbsp;A. Sam Pierre ,&nbsp;J. Dion ,&nbsp;M. Maheu","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Compare the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, compensatory saccades and head and eye coordination during head impulses between patients with dizziness but normal VOR gain and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Video head impulses test (vHIT; ICS impulse, Otometrics, Denmark) was reviewed in 40 participants (20 patients with dizziness; 20 controls). VOR gain, saccades characteristics (frequency of occurrence, amplitude, latency) and time difference between head and eye velocity was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference between groups was observed for VOR gain. However, saccade frequency was greater and time difference between head and eye was prolonged in patients with dizziness. No significant difference was observed for saccade amplitude, nor for saccade latency between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present study highlights that saccades observed in patients with normal VOR gain could reflect a clinical marker for dizziness in patients with normal VOR gain. We propose that theses saccades are caused by a prolonged time delay between head and eye velocity leading to a gaze position error.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The results support previous findings suggesting additional value of saccades and time delay when interpreting vHIT results. This study goes further by proposing time delay as a possible mechanism to explain increased saccade frequency in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain\",\"authors\":\"C. Orsini ,&nbsp;A.M. Cedras ,&nbsp;A. Sam Pierre ,&nbsp;J. Dion ,&nbsp;M. Maheu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Compare the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, compensatory saccades and head and eye coordination during head impulses between patients with dizziness but normal VOR gain and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Video head impulses test (vHIT; ICS impulse, Otometrics, Denmark) was reviewed in 40 participants (20 patients with dizziness; 20 controls). VOR gain, saccades characteristics (frequency of occurrence, amplitude, latency) and time difference between head and eye velocity was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference between groups was observed for VOR gain. However, saccade frequency was greater and time difference between head and eye was prolonged in patients with dizziness. No significant difference was observed for saccade amplitude, nor for saccade latency between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present study highlights that saccades observed in patients with normal VOR gain could reflect a clinical marker for dizziness in patients with normal VOR gain. We propose that theses saccades are caused by a prolonged time delay between head and eye velocity leading to a gaze position error.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The results support previous findings suggesting additional value of saccades and time delay when interpreting vHIT results. This study goes further by proposing time delay as a possible mechanism to explain increased saccade frequency in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 比较头晕但 VOR 增益正常的患者与健康对照组在头部冲动时的前庭-眼反射(VOR)增益、代偿性眼球移动和头眼协调情况。方法 对 40 名参与者(20 名头晕患者;20 名对照组)进行视频头部冲动测试(vHIT;ICS impulse,Otometrics,丹麦)。比较了VOR增益、囊回特性(发生频率、振幅、潜伏期)以及头眼速度的时间差。然而,眩晕患者的囊回频率更高,头眼速度时间差更长。结论 本研究强调,在 VOR 增益正常的患者中观察到的囊状移动可反映出头晕的临床标记。我们认为,这些眼球移动是由于头部和眼球速度之间的时间延迟过长导致注视位置错误所致。研究结果支持了之前的研究结果,即在解释 vHIT 结果时,眼球移动和时间延迟具有额外的价值。本研究进一步提出,时间延迟是解释VOR增益正常的眩晕患者囊回频率增加的可能机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain

Objective

Compare the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, compensatory saccades and head and eye coordination during head impulses between patients with dizziness but normal VOR gain and healthy controls.

Methods

Video head impulses test (vHIT; ICS impulse, Otometrics, Denmark) was reviewed in 40 participants (20 patients with dizziness; 20 controls). VOR gain, saccades characteristics (frequency of occurrence, amplitude, latency) and time difference between head and eye velocity was compared.

Results

No significant difference between groups was observed for VOR gain. However, saccade frequency was greater and time difference between head and eye was prolonged in patients with dizziness. No significant difference was observed for saccade amplitude, nor for saccade latency between groups.

Conclusions

The present study highlights that saccades observed in patients with normal VOR gain could reflect a clinical marker for dizziness in patients with normal VOR gain. We propose that theses saccades are caused by a prolonged time delay between head and eye velocity leading to a gaze position error.

Significance

The results support previous findings suggesting additional value of saccades and time delay when interpreting vHIT results. This study goes further by proposing time delay as a possible mechanism to explain increased saccade frequency in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信