丙戊酸有助于对抗 COVID-19:病例对照研究

O. Moreno-Pérez , E. Merino , J. Manuel Ramos , J. Carlos Rodríguez , C. Diaz , P. Mas , S. Reus , R. Sánchez-Martínez , V. Boix , P. Chico-Sánchez , J. Sánchez-Payá , J. Portilla , On behalf COVID19-ALC research group
{"title":"丙戊酸有助于对抗 COVID-19:病例对照研究","authors":"O. Moreno-Pérez ,&nbsp;E. Merino ,&nbsp;J. Manuel Ramos ,&nbsp;J. Carlos Rodríguez ,&nbsp;C. Diaz ,&nbsp;P. Mas ,&nbsp;S. Reus ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez-Martínez ,&nbsp;V. Boix ,&nbsp;P. Chico-Sánchez ,&nbsp;J. Sánchez-Payá ,&nbsp;J. Portilla ,&nbsp;On behalf COVID19-ALC research group","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There is early evidence about Valproic acid (VPA) antiviral effect. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VPA users as compared with the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A case-control study nested within a cohort, carried out between March 1 and December 17, 2020. Retrospectively, we identified confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection patients exposed to VPA in our health department (defined as case). We ascertained VPA regimen (all the time (AT) (292 days) or at least 20% of the study period (notAT) (≥58 days) and if VPA levels were in therapeutic range (ATR) (50–100<!--> <!-->mcg/mL) in the last 24 months. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission in the cases, comparing it with the general unexposed VPA population (controls).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 6183 PCR+ were detected among 281,035 inhabitants, of these, 746 were hospitalized. 691 patients were on VPA notAT and 628 (90.1%) AT. The indication for VPA use was epilepsy in 54.9%. The incidence of PCR+ was 1.736% (OR 0.785 (95%CI 0.443–1.390) and 1.910% (OR 0.865 (95%CI 0.488–1.533), on VPA notAT and VPA AT patients, respectively vs. 2.201% in people without VPA regimen. Those patients with VPA ATR had a lower risk of PCR + (OR 0.233 (95%CI 0.057–0.951) notAT; OR 0.218 (95%CI 0.053–0.890) AT). Hospital admission incidence was lower in patient on VPA (OR was 0.543 (95% CI 0.076–3.871).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with VPA within the therapeutic range had a reduction of SARS-Cov-2 infection incidence greater than 75%. There is a downward trend in the risk of COVID-19 admission by SARS-CoV-2 in patients on VPA therapy. These findings warrant further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 7","pages":"Pages 549-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000779/pdfft?md5=6b9d346c962f2cb227f986f1ec687e0c&pid=1-s2.0-S2173580823000779-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valproic acid could help in the fight against COVID-19: A case–control study\",\"authors\":\"O. Moreno-Pérez ,&nbsp;E. Merino ,&nbsp;J. Manuel Ramos ,&nbsp;J. Carlos Rodríguez ,&nbsp;C. Diaz ,&nbsp;P. Mas ,&nbsp;S. Reus ,&nbsp;R. Sánchez-Martínez ,&nbsp;V. Boix ,&nbsp;P. Chico-Sánchez ,&nbsp;J. Sánchez-Payá ,&nbsp;J. Portilla ,&nbsp;On behalf COVID19-ALC research group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.12.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There is early evidence about Valproic acid (VPA) antiviral effect. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VPA users as compared with the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A case-control study nested within a cohort, carried out between March 1 and December 17, 2020. Retrospectively, we identified confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection patients exposed to VPA in our health department (defined as case). We ascertained VPA regimen (all the time (AT) (292 days) or at least 20% of the study period (notAT) (≥58 days) and if VPA levels were in therapeutic range (ATR) (50–100<!--> <!-->mcg/mL) in the last 24 months. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission in the cases, comparing it with the general unexposed VPA population (controls).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 6183 PCR+ were detected among 281,035 inhabitants, of these, 746 were hospitalized. 691 patients were on VPA notAT and 628 (90.1%) AT. The indication for VPA use was epilepsy in 54.9%. The incidence of PCR+ was 1.736% (OR 0.785 (95%CI 0.443–1.390) and 1.910% (OR 0.865 (95%CI 0.488–1.533), on VPA notAT and VPA AT patients, respectively vs. 2.201% in people without VPA regimen. Those patients with VPA ATR had a lower risk of PCR + (OR 0.233 (95%CI 0.057–0.951) notAT; OR 0.218 (95%CI 0.053–0.890) AT). Hospital admission incidence was lower in patient on VPA (OR was 0.543 (95% CI 0.076–3.871).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with VPA within the therapeutic range had a reduction of SARS-Cov-2 infection incidence greater than 75%. There is a downward trend in the risk of COVID-19 admission by SARS-CoV-2 in patients on VPA therapy. These findings warrant further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"39 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 549-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000779/pdfft?md5=6b9d346c962f2cb227f986f1ec687e0c&pid=1-s2.0-S2173580823000779-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目前已有早期证据表明丙戊酸(VPA)具有抗病毒作用。我们的目的是调查 VPA 使用者与普通人群相比,SARS-CoV-2 感染的发生率和严重程度。我们回顾性地确定了在卫生部门接触过 VPA 的确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染者(定义为病例)。我们确定了 VPA 方案(全部时间(AT)(292 天)或研究期间至少 20% 的时间(notAT)(≥58 天)),以及过去 24 个月中 VPA 水平是否在治疗范围(ATR)(50-100 mcg/mL)内。我们计算了病例中 SARS-CoV-2 感染和住院的累积发病率,并将其与未接触 VPA 的一般人群(对照组)进行了比较。691 名患者使用 VPA(非抗生素),628 名(90.1%)使用抗生素。54.9% 的 VPA 患者的适应症是癫痫。VPA notAT 和 VPA AT 患者的 PCR+ 发生率分别为 1.736%(OR 0.785(95%CI 0.443-1.390))和 1.910%(OR 0.865(95%CI 0.488-1.533)),而未使用 VPA 方案的患者的 PCR+ 发生率为 2.201%。使用 VPA ATR 的患者 PCR + 的风险较低(非 AT OR 0.233(95%CI 0.057-0.951);AT OR 0.218(95%CI 0.053-0.890))。使用 VPA 的患者入院率较低(OR 为 0.543 (95%CI 0.076-3.871))。接受 VPA 治疗的患者因 SARS-CoV-2 感染 COVID-19 的风险呈下降趋势。这些发现值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valproic acid could help in the fight against COVID-19: A case–control study

Objective

There is early evidence about Valproic acid (VPA) antiviral effect. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VPA users as compared with the general population.

Material and methods

A case-control study nested within a cohort, carried out between March 1 and December 17, 2020. Retrospectively, we identified confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection patients exposed to VPA in our health department (defined as case). We ascertained VPA regimen (all the time (AT) (292 days) or at least 20% of the study period (notAT) (≥58 days) and if VPA levels were in therapeutic range (ATR) (50–100 mcg/mL) in the last 24 months. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission in the cases, comparing it with the general unexposed VPA population (controls).

Results

During the study period, 6183 PCR+ were detected among 281,035 inhabitants, of these, 746 were hospitalized. 691 patients were on VPA notAT and 628 (90.1%) AT. The indication for VPA use was epilepsy in 54.9%. The incidence of PCR+ was 1.736% (OR 0.785 (95%CI 0.443–1.390) and 1.910% (OR 0.865 (95%CI 0.488–1.533), on VPA notAT and VPA AT patients, respectively vs. 2.201% in people without VPA regimen. Those patients with VPA ATR had a lower risk of PCR + (OR 0.233 (95%CI 0.057–0.951) notAT; OR 0.218 (95%CI 0.053–0.890) AT). Hospital admission incidence was lower in patient on VPA (OR was 0.543 (95% CI 0.076–3.871).

Conclusion

Patients with VPA within the therapeutic range had a reduction of SARS-Cov-2 infection incidence greater than 75%. There is a downward trend in the risk of COVID-19 admission by SARS-CoV-2 in patients on VPA therapy. These findings warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信