Jacques Brisson , Pedro Carvalho , Otto Stein , Kela Weber , Hans Brix , Yaqian Zhao , Florentina Zurita
{"title":"小规模实验:在湿地处理研究中使用中型模式和微型模式检验假设","authors":"Jacques Brisson , Pedro Carvalho , Otto Stein , Kela Weber , Hans Brix , Yaqian Zhao , Florentina Zurita","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Small-scale experiments have been conducted to investigate a wide range of factors suspected to influence treatment wetland (TW) functions and efficiency. One crucial advantage microcosms and mesocosms offer over field-scale systems is that they enable reproduction of experimental treatment units that are as similar as possible, only varying the factor(s) of interest. The goal of this paper is to discuss key methodological issues to consider, as well as the overall potential and limitations of using small-scale experiments as applied specifically to TW research. Planning a successful small-scale experiment to address a scientific question in TW science involves several key decisions to reach the project's goal. Due to financial, space or resources constraints, it is fundamental at the planning stage to carefully determine a suitable compromise between unit size, number of units, number of treatments (both in terms of number of variables and number of levels within each variable) and replication. Producing, properly storing and rigorously distributing the same volume or flow rate of wastewater to each unit is often the most challenging and time-consuming aspect of a small-scale TW experiment. Unavoidable sources of bias inherent in small-scale models must be identified, and when possible, minimized. Small-scale experiments for treatment wetlands can only take on full meaning when the insights obtained through them inform full-scale operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-scale experiments: Using mesocosms and microcosms for testing hypotheses in treatment wetland research\",\"authors\":\"Jacques Brisson , Pedro Carvalho , Otto Stein , Kela Weber , Hans Brix , Yaqian Zhao , Florentina Zurita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Small-scale experiments have been conducted to investigate a wide range of factors suspected to influence treatment wetland (TW) functions and efficiency. One crucial advantage microcosms and mesocosms offer over field-scale systems is that they enable reproduction of experimental treatment units that are as similar as possible, only varying the factor(s) of interest. The goal of this paper is to discuss key methodological issues to consider, as well as the overall potential and limitations of using small-scale experiments as applied specifically to TW research. Planning a successful small-scale experiment to address a scientific question in TW science involves several key decisions to reach the project's goal. Due to financial, space or resources constraints, it is fundamental at the planning stage to carefully determine a suitable compromise between unit size, number of units, number of treatments (both in terms of number of variables and number of levels within each variable) and replication. Producing, properly storing and rigorously distributing the same volume or flow rate of wastewater to each unit is often the most challenging and time-consuming aspect of a small-scale TW experiment. Unavoidable sources of bias inherent in small-scale models must be identified, and when possible, minimized. Small-scale experiments for treatment wetlands can only take on full meaning when the insights obtained through them inform full-scale operations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002039\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Small-scale experiments: Using mesocosms and microcosms for testing hypotheses in treatment wetland research
Small-scale experiments have been conducted to investigate a wide range of factors suspected to influence treatment wetland (TW) functions and efficiency. One crucial advantage microcosms and mesocosms offer over field-scale systems is that they enable reproduction of experimental treatment units that are as similar as possible, only varying the factor(s) of interest. The goal of this paper is to discuss key methodological issues to consider, as well as the overall potential and limitations of using small-scale experiments as applied specifically to TW research. Planning a successful small-scale experiment to address a scientific question in TW science involves several key decisions to reach the project's goal. Due to financial, space or resources constraints, it is fundamental at the planning stage to carefully determine a suitable compromise between unit size, number of units, number of treatments (both in terms of number of variables and number of levels within each variable) and replication. Producing, properly storing and rigorously distributing the same volume or flow rate of wastewater to each unit is often the most challenging and time-consuming aspect of a small-scale TW experiment. Unavoidable sources of bias inherent in small-scale models must be identified, and when possible, minimized. Small-scale experiments for treatment wetlands can only take on full meaning when the insights obtained through them inform full-scale operations.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.