诊疗包干付费改革是否影响二、三级医院的医疗费用、医疗质量和医疗服务能力?基于中国西北某省的差异分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S467471
Jiali Teng, Qian Li, Guihang Song, Youli Han
{"title":"诊疗包干付费改革是否影响二、三级医院的医疗费用、医疗质量和医疗服务能力?基于中国西北某省的差异分析。","authors":"Jiali Teng, Qian Li, Guihang Song, Youli Han","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S467471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To control medical costs and regulate the behavior of providers, China has formed an original widely piloted case-based payment under the regional global budget, called the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP). This study aimed to evaluated the impact of the DIP payment reform on medical costs, quality of care, and medical service capacity in a less-developed pilot city in Northwest China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We used the de-identified case-level discharge data of hospitalized patients from January 2021 to June 2022 in pilot and control cities located in the same province. We performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to examine the differential impact of the DIP reform for the entire sample and between secondary and tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIP payment reform resulted in a significant decrease of total expenditure per case in the entire sample (5.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and tertiary hospitals (9.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In-hospital mortality rate decreased significantly in tertiary hospitals (negligible in size, <i>P</i> < 0.05), as did all-cause readmission rate within 30 days in the entire sample (1.1 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and secondary hospitals (1.4 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Proportion of severe patients increased significantly in the entire sample (1.2 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and tertiary hospitals (2.5 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01). We did not find the DIP reform was associated with a significant change in relative weight per case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIP payment reform in the less-developed pilot city achieved short-term success in controlling medical costs without sacrificing the quality of care for the entire sample. Compared with secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals experienced a greater decline in medical costs and received more severe patients. These findings hold lessons for less developed countries or areas to implement case-based payments and remind them of the variations between different levels of hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"2055-2065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform Impact Medical Costs, Quality, and Medical Service Capacity in Secondary and Tertiary Hospitals? A Difference-in-Differences Analysis Based on a Province in Northwest China.\",\"authors\":\"Jiali Teng, Qian Li, Guihang Song, Youli Han\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S467471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To control medical costs and regulate the behavior of providers, China has formed an original widely piloted case-based payment under the regional global budget, called the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP). This study aimed to evaluated the impact of the DIP payment reform on medical costs, quality of care, and medical service capacity in a less-developed pilot city in Northwest China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We used the de-identified case-level discharge data of hospitalized patients from January 2021 to June 2022 in pilot and control cities located in the same province. We performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to examine the differential impact of the DIP reform for the entire sample and between secondary and tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIP payment reform resulted in a significant decrease of total expenditure per case in the entire sample (5.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and tertiary hospitals (9.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In-hospital mortality rate decreased significantly in tertiary hospitals (negligible in size, <i>P</i> < 0.05), as did all-cause readmission rate within 30 days in the entire sample (1.1 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and secondary hospitals (1.4 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Proportion of severe patients increased significantly in the entire sample (1.2 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and tertiary hospitals (2.5 percentage points, <i>P</i> < 0.01). We did not find the DIP reform was associated with a significant change in relative weight per case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIP payment reform in the less-developed pilot city achieved short-term success in controlling medical costs without sacrificing the quality of care for the entire sample. Compared with secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals experienced a greater decline in medical costs and received more severe patients. These findings hold lessons for less developed countries or areas to implement case-based payments and remind them of the variations between different levels of hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"2055-2065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S467471\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S467471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为控制医疗费用,规范医疗机构行为,我国在地区全口径预算下,独创性地形成了广泛试点的以病例为基础的付费方式,即 "诊断-干预包"(DIP)。本研究旨在评估 DIP 支付改革对中国西北部一个欠发达试点城市的医疗费用、医疗质量和医疗服务能力的影响:我们使用了试点城市和对照城市 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月住院患者的去标识化病例级出院数据。我们进行了差异分析(DID),研究了DIP改革对整个样本以及二级医院和三级医院的不同影响:结果:DIP支付改革显著降低了整个样本(5.5%,P<0.01)和三级医院(9.3%,P<0.01)的每例总支出。三级医院的院内死亡率明显下降(可忽略不计,P < 0.05),整个样本(1.1 个百分点,P < 0.01)和二级医院(1.4 个百分点,P < 0.01)的 30 天内全因再入院率也明显下降。重症患者比例在整个样本(1.2 个百分点,P < 0.05)和三级医院(2.5 个百分点,P < 0.01)中均显著增加。我们没有发现 DIP 改革与每个病例相对权重的显著变化有关:结论:在欠发达试点城市进行的 DIP 付费改革在控制医疗费用方面取得了短期成功,但并未牺牲整个样本的医疗质量。与二级医院相比,三级医院的医疗费用下降幅度更大,接收的重症患者也更多。这些研究结果为欠发达国家或地区实施病例付费提供了借鉴,并提醒他们注意不同级别医院之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform Impact Medical Costs, Quality, and Medical Service Capacity in Secondary and Tertiary Hospitals? A Difference-in-Differences Analysis Based on a Province in Northwest China.

Purpose: To control medical costs and regulate the behavior of providers, China has formed an original widely piloted case-based payment under the regional global budget, called the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP). This study aimed to evaluated the impact of the DIP payment reform on medical costs, quality of care, and medical service capacity in a less-developed pilot city in Northwest China.

Patients and methods: We used the de-identified case-level discharge data of hospitalized patients from January 2021 to June 2022 in pilot and control cities located in the same province. We performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to examine the differential impact of the DIP reform for the entire sample and between secondary and tertiary hospitals.

Results: The DIP payment reform resulted in a significant decrease of total expenditure per case in the entire sample (5.5%, P < 0.01) and tertiary hospitals (9.3%, P < 0.01). In-hospital mortality rate decreased significantly in tertiary hospitals (negligible in size, P < 0.05), as did all-cause readmission rate within 30 days in the entire sample (1.1 percentage points, P < 0.01) and secondary hospitals (1.4 percentage points, P < 0.01). Proportion of severe patients increased significantly in the entire sample (1.2 percentage points, P < 0.05) and tertiary hospitals (2.5 percentage points, P < 0.01). We did not find the DIP reform was associated with a significant change in relative weight per case.

Conclusion: The DIP payment reform in the less-developed pilot city achieved short-term success in controlling medical costs without sacrificing the quality of care for the entire sample. Compared with secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals experienced a greater decline in medical costs and received more severe patients. These findings hold lessons for less developed countries or areas to implement case-based payments and remind them of the variations between different levels of hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信