糖尿病/肾脏病共同会诊中患者与医生的互动--定性观察研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/scs.13299
Leah Sejrup Christensen, Eithne Hayes Bauer, Jette Primdahl
{"title":"糖尿病/肾脏病共同会诊中患者与医生的互动--定性观察研究。","authors":"Leah Sejrup Christensen, Eithne Hayes Bauer, Jette Primdahl","doi":"10.1111/scs.13299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>We performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found one over-arching theme: 'A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease' and four subthemes: (1) 'The medical focal point' pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) 'The possibility of negotiations' illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) 'Speaking different languages' displayed how patients used alternative illness-based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) 'Perceptions of everyday life' concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings.</p><p><strong>Short phrases: </strong>Shared Outpatient Clinic, Patient-clinician interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"984-995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-clinician interactions in shared diabetes/nephrology consultations - A qualitative observation study.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Sejrup Christensen, Eithne Hayes Bauer, Jette Primdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scs.13299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>We performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found one over-arching theme: 'A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease' and four subthemes: (1) 'The medical focal point' pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) 'The possibility of negotiations' illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) 'Speaking different languages' displayed how patients used alternative illness-based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) 'Perceptions of everyday life' concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings.</p><p><strong>Short phrases: </strong>Shared Outpatient Clinic, Patient-clinician interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"984-995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全球慢性病发病率不断上升,这反过来又增加了对医疗保健服务的需求。为满足这些需求,医疗保健系统正在调整其服务,以降低治疗成本,确保多种疾病患者的治疗连贯一致。其中一种调整方式是内科专科之间共享门诊咨询。目的:本项目旨在探讨糖尿病和慢性肾病患者在共享门诊环境中如何与多位临床医生互动:我们开展了一项定性人种学研究,将重点参与者观察与非正式实地访谈相结合。我们在项目中纳入了 17 名参与者,其中男性 9 人,女性 8 人,平均年龄为 67.3 岁。数据分析以布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法以及阿瑟-克莱因曼的疾病理论为指导:我们发现了一个总主题:"包含疾病和疾病的咨询 "和四个副主题:(1) "医学焦点 "涉及病人和临床医生对话中对生理测量的关注。(2) "协商的可能性 "说明了透析和药物治疗的决定是如何通过协商做出的。(3) "使用不同的语言 "展示了患者如何使用基于疾病的其他解释,而临床医生则倾向于使用生物医学语言。(4) "对日常生活的看法 "涉及患者在处理疾病和日常生活时认为什么对他们最有利:患者提供的信息涉及他们如何平衡生活中的生理和心理挑战。当临床医生从生物医学角度出发时,就会错失了解患者疾病行为或协商线索的机会。患者优先考虑日常功能,而不是遵循治疗方案。这些发现并不可靠,需要在类似环境下的类似研究中加以验证:短语:共享门诊、患者与医生的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-clinician interactions in shared diabetes/nephrology consultations - A qualitative observation study.

Background: The incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations.

Aim: This project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting.

Research methods: We performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease.

Results: We found one over-arching theme: 'A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease' and four subthemes: (1) 'The medical focal point' pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) 'The possibility of negotiations' illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) 'Speaking different languages' displayed how patients used alternative illness-based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) 'Perceptions of everyday life' concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives.

Conclusion: Patients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings.

Short phrases: Shared Outpatient Clinic, Patient-clinician interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信