对用于放射学人工智能临床评估的成果指标和衡量标准进行概念性审查。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9
Seong Ho Park, Kyunghwa Han, June-Goo Lee
{"title":"对用于放射学人工智能临床评估的成果指标和衡量标准进行概念性审查。","authors":"Seong Ho Park, Kyunghwa Han, June-Goo Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in radiology. Clinical research studies to evaluate the AI models are also diverse. Consequently, diverse outcome metrics and measures are employed in the clinical evaluation of AI, presenting a challenge for clinical radiologists. This review aims to provide conceptually intuitive explanations of the outcome metrics and measures that are most frequently used in clinical research, specifically tailored for clinicians. While we briefly discuss performance metrics for AI models in binary classification, detection, or segmentation tasks, our primary focus is on less frequently addressed topics in published literature. These include metrics and measures for evaluating multiclass classification; those for evaluating generative AI models, such as models used in image generation or modification and large language models; and outcome measures beyond performance metrics, including patient-centered outcome measures. Our explanations aim to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of these metrics and measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"1644-1655"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.\",\"authors\":\"Seong Ho Park, Kyunghwa Han, June-Goo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in radiology. Clinical research studies to evaluate the AI models are also diverse. Consequently, diverse outcome metrics and measures are employed in the clinical evaluation of AI, presenting a challenge for clinical radiologists. This review aims to provide conceptually intuitive explanations of the outcome metrics and measures that are most frequently used in clinical research, specifically tailored for clinicians. While we briefly discuss performance metrics for AI models in binary classification, detection, or segmentation tasks, our primary focus is on less frequently addressed topics in published literature. These include metrics and measures for evaluating multiclass classification; those for evaluating generative AI models, such as models used in image generation or modification and large language models; and outcome measures beyond performance metrics, including patient-centered outcome measures. Our explanations aim to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of these metrics and measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1644-1655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在放射学中应用广泛。评估人工智能模型的临床研究也多种多样。因此,在人工智能的临床评估中采用的结果指标和测量方法也多种多样,这给临床放射科医生带来了挑战。本综述旨在从概念上直观地解释临床研究中最常用的结果指标和测量方法,特别是针对临床医生。虽然我们简要讨论了人工智能模型在二元分类、检测或分割任务中的性能指标,但我们主要关注的是已发表文献中较少涉及的主题。其中包括评估多类分类的指标和测量方法;评估生成型人工智能模型的指标和测量方法,如用于图像生成或修改的模型和大型语言模型;以及性能指标以外的结果测量方法,包括以患者为中心的结果测量方法。我们的解释旨在指导临床医生正确使用这些指标和测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.

Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in radiology. Clinical research studies to evaluate the AI models are also diverse. Consequently, diverse outcome metrics and measures are employed in the clinical evaluation of AI, presenting a challenge for clinical radiologists. This review aims to provide conceptually intuitive explanations of the outcome metrics and measures that are most frequently used in clinical research, specifically tailored for clinicians. While we briefly discuss performance metrics for AI models in binary classification, detection, or segmentation tasks, our primary focus is on less frequently addressed topics in published literature. These include metrics and measures for evaluating multiclass classification; those for evaluating generative AI models, such as models used in image generation or modification and large language models; and outcome measures beyond performance metrics, including patient-centered outcome measures. Our explanations aim to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of these metrics and measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信