Sandra Murcia Carretero, Katrin Petermann, Ines Debove, Deborah Amstutz, Mário Sousa, Julia Waskönig, Andreas Antonios Diamantaras, Gerd Tinkhauser, Andreas Nowacki, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schuepbach, Paul Krack, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer
{"title":"帕金森病患者脑深部刺激后的生活质量:目标是否重要?","authors":"Sandra Murcia Carretero, Katrin Petermann, Ines Debove, Deborah Amstutz, Mário Sousa, Julia Waskönig, Andreas Antonios Diamantaras, Gerd Tinkhauser, Andreas Nowacki, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schuepbach, Paul Krack, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an accepted therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with disabling motor complications. For elderly patients with poorer cognition and postural instability, GPi has been proposed as the preferable DBS target based on expert opinion, arguing GPi-DBS may be less complicated by depression, apathy, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction, resulting in greater improvement in quality of life (QoL). However, data supporting such patient-tailored approach are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to analyze whether the DBS target influences QoL in a PD cohort and a matched subgroup of frail patients with poor cognitive status and reduced postural stability, and whether other factors affect the QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed a single-center cohort of 138 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS (117) or GPi-DBS (21) using the mentioned approach for target selection. All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluations of motor- and nonmotor signs as well as QoL before and 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS of both targets improved motor signs, dyskinesias, and pain. QoL improved without significant difference between the targets, but with a trend for greater improvement across all QoL domains in favor of the STN, even in an STN subgroup matched to the GPi group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results contradict the prevailing belief that GPi-DBS is superior in frail PD patients with cognitive decline and postural instability, questioning the proposed patient-tailored approach of DBS target selection. Further studies are needed for a data-driven approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life after Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Does the Target Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Murcia Carretero, Katrin Petermann, Ines Debove, Deborah Amstutz, Mário Sousa, Julia Waskönig, Andreas Antonios Diamantaras, Gerd Tinkhauser, Andreas Nowacki, Claudio Pollo, Michael Schuepbach, Paul Krack, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an accepted therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with disabling motor complications. For elderly patients with poorer cognition and postural instability, GPi has been proposed as the preferable DBS target based on expert opinion, arguing GPi-DBS may be less complicated by depression, apathy, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction, resulting in greater improvement in quality of life (QoL). However, data supporting such patient-tailored approach are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to analyze whether the DBS target influences QoL in a PD cohort and a matched subgroup of frail patients with poor cognitive status and reduced postural stability, and whether other factors affect the QoL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed a single-center cohort of 138 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS (117) or GPi-DBS (21) using the mentioned approach for target selection. All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluations of motor- and nonmotor signs as well as QoL before and 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS of both targets improved motor signs, dyskinesias, and pain. QoL improved without significant difference between the targets, but with a trend for greater improvement across all QoL domains in favor of the STN, even in an STN subgroup matched to the GPi group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results contradict the prevailing belief that GPi-DBS is superior in frail PD patients with cognitive decline and postural instability, questioning the proposed patient-tailored approach of DBS target selection. Further studies are needed for a data-driven approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1379-1387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of Life after Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Does the Target Matter?
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an accepted therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with disabling motor complications. For elderly patients with poorer cognition and postural instability, GPi has been proposed as the preferable DBS target based on expert opinion, arguing GPi-DBS may be less complicated by depression, apathy, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction, resulting in greater improvement in quality of life (QoL). However, data supporting such patient-tailored approach are lacking.
Objectives: The aims were to analyze whether the DBS target influences QoL in a PD cohort and a matched subgroup of frail patients with poor cognitive status and reduced postural stability, and whether other factors affect the QoL outcomes.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a single-center cohort of 138 PD patients who received bilateral STN-DBS (117) or GPi-DBS (21) using the mentioned approach for target selection. All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluations of motor- and nonmotor signs as well as QoL before and 1 year after surgery.
Results: DBS of both targets improved motor signs, dyskinesias, and pain. QoL improved without significant difference between the targets, but with a trend for greater improvement across all QoL domains in favor of the STN, even in an STN subgroup matched to the GPi group.
Conclusion: Our results contradict the prevailing belief that GPi-DBS is superior in frail PD patients with cognitive decline and postural instability, questioning the proposed patient-tailored approach of DBS target selection. Further studies are needed for a data-driven approach.
期刊介绍:
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)