Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术患者胆道和胰腺病变的内镜治疗:根据 9 年经验制定治疗方案。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07471-3
Laurent Monino, Lancelot Marique, Yannick Deswysen, Maximilien Thoma, Pierre H Deprez, Pierre Goffette, Benoit Navez, Tom G Moreels
{"title":"Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术患者胆道和胰腺病变的内镜治疗:根据 9 年经验制定治疗方案。","authors":"Laurent Monino, Lancelot Marique, Yannick Deswysen, Maximilien Thoma, Pierre H Deprez, Pierre Goffette, Benoit Navez, Tom G Moreels","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07471-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of biliopancreatic pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients is challenging despite the availability of multiple approaches like single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI). We evaluated the outcomes of the interchangeable combination of endoscopic procedures to treat biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients with biliopancreatic pathology between June 2014 and September 2023. Primary endpoints were technical success, adverse events (AE), and parameters of endoscopic procedures according to etiology. A clinically useful management algorithm was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients with RYGB (73 women; mean age 55 ± 10 years) were included. A total of 113 SBE-ERCP (in 90 patients), 26 EDGI (in 23 patients), and 2 LA-ERCP (in 2 patients) were performed. Technical success of SBE-ERCP was lower compared to EDGI (74.4% vs 95.1%, p = 0.002). The AE rate was lower using SBE-ERCP compared to EDGI (12.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.003). Two sub-groups based on etiology were identified as \"common bile duct stone\" (CBDS) and \"Other.\" In the CBDS group, the mean number and time of procedures were lower in SBE-ERCP as the first-line technique compared to first-line EDGI (1.1 vs 2.7, p < 0.00 and 91 ± 20.7 min vs 161 ± 61.3 min, p < 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of endoscopic procedures can achieve high technical success in managing biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients with an acceptable AE rate. In the case of CBDS, SBE-ERCP appeared to be a good first-line single-step option. For other indications, EDGI should be proposed as the first line.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Management of Biliary and Pancreatic Pathologies in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: Development of a Treatment Algorithm Based on 9-Year Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Monino, Lancelot Marique, Yannick Deswysen, Maximilien Thoma, Pierre H Deprez, Pierre Goffette, Benoit Navez, Tom G Moreels\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07471-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of biliopancreatic pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients is challenging despite the availability of multiple approaches like single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI). We evaluated the outcomes of the interchangeable combination of endoscopic procedures to treat biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients with biliopancreatic pathology between June 2014 and September 2023. Primary endpoints were technical success, adverse events (AE), and parameters of endoscopic procedures according to etiology. A clinically useful management algorithm was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients with RYGB (73 women; mean age 55 ± 10 years) were included. A total of 113 SBE-ERCP (in 90 patients), 26 EDGI (in 23 patients), and 2 LA-ERCP (in 2 patients) were performed. Technical success of SBE-ERCP was lower compared to EDGI (74.4% vs 95.1%, p = 0.002). The AE rate was lower using SBE-ERCP compared to EDGI (12.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.003). Two sub-groups based on etiology were identified as \\\"common bile duct stone\\\" (CBDS) and \\\"Other.\\\" In the CBDS group, the mean number and time of procedures were lower in SBE-ERCP as the first-line technique compared to first-line EDGI (1.1 vs 2.7, p < 0.00 and 91 ± 20.7 min vs 161 ± 61.3 min, p < 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of endoscopic procedures can achieve high technical success in managing biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients with an acceptable AE rate. In the case of CBDS, SBE-ERCP appeared to be a good first-line single-step option. For other indications, EDGI should be proposed as the first line.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07471-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07471-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有多种方法可供选择,如单球囊肠镜辅助ERCP(SBE-ERCP)、腹腔镜辅助ERCP(LA-ERCP)和EUS引导的经胃介入治疗(EDGI),但Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)患者胆胰病变的治疗仍具有挑战性。我们评估了可互换的内镜手术组合治疗 RYGB 患者胆胰病变的效果:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象是2014年6月至2023年9月期间连续接受RYGB治疗的胆胰病变患者。主要终点为技术成功率、不良事件(AE)以及根据病因确定的内镜手术参数。结果:共纳入 102 名 RYGB 患者(73 名女性;平均年龄 55 ± 10 岁)。共实施了 113 例 SBE-ERCP (90 例患者)、26 例 EDGI(23 例患者)和 2 例 LA-ERCP (2 例患者)。SBE-ERCP 的技术成功率低于 EDGI(74.4% vs 95.1%,P = 0.002)。SBE-ERCP的AE率低于EDGI(12.4% vs 38.5%,P = 0.003)。根据病因分为 "胆总管结石"(CBDS)和 "其他 "两组。在 CBDS 组中,与一线 EDGI 相比,SBE-ERCP 作为一线技术的平均手术次数和时间更少(1.1 对 2.7,P 结论:SBE-ERCP 作为一线技术的平均手术次数和时间更少:在处理 RYGB 患者的胆胰病变时,内镜手术的联合应用可取得较高的技术成功率,且AE 发生率可接受。就 CBDS 而言,SBE-ERCP 似乎是不错的一线单步骤选择。对于其他适应症,应建议将 EDGI 作为一线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Endoscopic Management of Biliary and Pancreatic Pathologies in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: Development of a Treatment Algorithm Based on 9-Year Experience.

Endoscopic Management of Biliary and Pancreatic Pathologies in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: Development of a Treatment Algorithm Based on 9-Year Experience.

Background: Management of biliopancreatic pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients is challenging despite the availability of multiple approaches like single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI). We evaluated the outcomes of the interchangeable combination of endoscopic procedures to treat biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients.

Materials and methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients with biliopancreatic pathology between June 2014 and September 2023. Primary endpoints were technical success, adverse events (AE), and parameters of endoscopic procedures according to etiology. A clinically useful management algorithm was developed.

Results: A total of 102 patients with RYGB (73 women; mean age 55 ± 10 years) were included. A total of 113 SBE-ERCP (in 90 patients), 26 EDGI (in 23 patients), and 2 LA-ERCP (in 2 patients) were performed. Technical success of SBE-ERCP was lower compared to EDGI (74.4% vs 95.1%, p = 0.002). The AE rate was lower using SBE-ERCP compared to EDGI (12.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.003). Two sub-groups based on etiology were identified as "common bile duct stone" (CBDS) and "Other." In the CBDS group, the mean number and time of procedures were lower in SBE-ERCP as the first-line technique compared to first-line EDGI (1.1 vs 2.7, p < 0.00 and 91 ± 20.7 min vs 161 ± 61.3 min, p < 0.00).

Conclusion: A combination of endoscopic procedures can achieve high technical success in managing biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients with an acceptable AE rate. In the case of CBDS, SBE-ERCP appeared to be a good first-line single-step option. For other indications, EDGI should be proposed as the first line.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信