埃塞俄比亚精神病筛查问卷的项目反应理论分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚精神病筛查问卷的项目反应理论分析。","authors":"Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra","doi":"10.1111/eip.13609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.</p><p><strong>Result and discussion: </strong>The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4.59</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(\\alpha =4.59\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and lowest difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.53</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\beta =2.53 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.98</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\beta =2.98 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.</p><p><strong>Result and discussion: </strong>The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4.59</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(\\\\alpha =4.59\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and lowest difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.53</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =2.53 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.98</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =2.98 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在非洲使用的精神病筛查工具很少经过测试,然而适当的工具可以提高自我报告的精神病症状的检出率,改善精神病的检出率并影响其预后:方法:我们在 1928 名无精神病史的埃塞俄比亚成年人样本中,采用确证因子分析(CFA)和项目反应理论(IRT)对精神病筛查问卷(PSQ)的构造效度和因子结构进行了测试。我们测试了有无躁狂症项目的单维模型。对于 IRT,我们测试了单维潜在结构的单参数逻辑模型(1PL)和双参数逻辑模型(2PL),并使用似然比检验比较了相对拟合程度:在埃塞俄比亚普通医疗机构的成人样本中,终生筛查阳性率为 2.8%。单维模型对 PSQ 的拟合效果良好(CFI = 0.993,TLI = 0.986,RMSEA = 0.025)。就 IRT 而言,2PL 模型的拟合效果最好。对项目难度和区分度参数的 IRT 检验表明,偏执狂的区分度最高(α = 4.59),难度最低(β = 2.53),可能在精神病特征水平较低时得到认可。思维插入的项目难度最高 ( β = 2.98 $$ \beta = 2.98 $$)。总体而言,该问卷能在较高的潜在特质水平上捕捉到精神病的构造,可能适用于检测中度至重度精神病:结论:PSQ 在筛查埃塞俄比亚成年人精神病方面具有良好的建构效度。未来的研究可能会侧重于 PSQ 的诊断有效性,并将其与结构化临床访谈进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.

Aim: Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.

Method: The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.

Result and discussion: The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination α = 4.59 $$ \left(\alpha =4.59\right) $$ and lowest difficulty ( β = 2.53 $$ \beta =2.53 $$ ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( β = 2.98 $$ \beta =2.98 $$ ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.

Conclusion: The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信