Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚精神病筛查问卷的项目反应理论分析。","authors":"Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra","doi":"10.1111/eip.13609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.</p><p><strong>Result and discussion: </strong>The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4.59</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(\\alpha =4.59\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and lowest difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.53</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\beta =2.53 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.98</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\beta =2.98 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Mahlet Yared, Hannah H Kim, Amantia Ametaj, Melkam Alemayehu, Anne Stevenson, Barkot Milkias, Engida Girma, Bizu Gelaye, Solomon Teferra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.</p><p><strong>Result and discussion: </strong>The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4.59</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(\\\\alpha =4.59\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and lowest difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.53</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =2.53 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.98</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\beta =2.98 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.
Aim: Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.
Method: The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.
Result and discussion: The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination and lowest difficulty ( ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.
Conclusion: The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.
期刊介绍:
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.