喉罩插入时口咽刺激对成年患者心血管反应的影响。双盲临床试验研究。

Hamidreza Shetabi, Zahra Naserzadeh
{"title":"喉罩插入时口咽刺激对成年患者心血管反应的影响。双盲临床试验研究。","authors":"Hamidreza Shetabi, Zahra Naserzadeh","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2024.101902.1499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion has been found to reduce cardiovascular responses when compared to laryngoscopy and intubation. This research aimed to examine the impact of various techniques employed for LMA insertion on cardiovascular response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 90 elective surgery candidates divided into three groups of 30. All patients underwent similar anesthesia. The LMA was inserted using the classical technique, 180° rotation technique, and face-to-face triple maneuver technique (FFTMT). The cardiovascular responses, the success rate of LMA placement, and other outcomes were documented and compared among the three methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the blood pressure of patients 10 minutes after LMA insertion using the rotational technique was higher than the standard technique (<i>p</i>=0.019). The pulse rate in the third (<i>p</i>=0.044, <i>p</i>=0.024) and fifth minutes (<i>p</i>=0.028, <i>p</i>=0.048) following the insertion of LMA demonstrated higher values when utilizing the FFTMT than the standard and rotational technique groups, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of sore throat following surgery in the FTFTM group was slightly greater than that observed with the standard and rotation techniques (<i>p</i>=0.389 and <i>p</i>=0.688, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the present investigation indicated that implementing the classic technique for LMA placement resulted in a more consistent blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) response than the 180° rotation and FFTMT. Furthermore, the classical method exhibited a marginally lower success rate in terms of LMA insertion than the alternative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Oropharyngeal Stimulation during Laryngeal Mask Insertion on Cardiovascular Response in adult patients. A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Shetabi, Zahra Naserzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2024.101902.1499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion has been found to reduce cardiovascular responses when compared to laryngoscopy and intubation. This research aimed to examine the impact of various techniques employed for LMA insertion on cardiovascular response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 90 elective surgery candidates divided into three groups of 30. All patients underwent similar anesthesia. The LMA was inserted using the classical technique, 180° rotation technique, and face-to-face triple maneuver technique (FFTMT). The cardiovascular responses, the success rate of LMA placement, and other outcomes were documented and compared among the three methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the blood pressure of patients 10 minutes after LMA insertion using the rotational technique was higher than the standard technique (<i>p</i>=0.019). The pulse rate in the third (<i>p</i>=0.044, <i>p</i>=0.024) and fifth minutes (<i>p</i>=0.028, <i>p</i>=0.048) following the insertion of LMA demonstrated higher values when utilizing the FFTMT than the standard and rotational technique groups, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of sore throat following surgery in the FTFTM group was slightly greater than that observed with the standard and rotation techniques (<i>p</i>=0.389 and <i>p</i>=0.688, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the present investigation indicated that implementing the classic technique for LMA placement resulted in a more consistent blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) response than the 180° rotation and FFTMT. Furthermore, the classical method exhibited a marginally lower success rate in terms of LMA insertion than the alternative methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366265/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2024.101902.1499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2024.101902.1499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与喉镜检查和插管相比,插入喉罩气道(LMA)可降低心血管反应。本研究旨在探讨插入 LMA 时采用的各种技术对心血管反应的影响:这项随机双盲临床试验包括 90 名择期手术候选者,分为三组,每组 30 人。所有患者都接受了类似的麻醉。采用传统技术、180° 旋转技术和面对面三重手法(FFTMT)插入 LMA。记录并比较了三种方法的心血管反应、LMA 置入成功率和其他结果:研究显示,使用旋转技术插入 LMA 10 分钟后患者的血压高于标准技术(P=0.019)。在插入 LMA 后的第三分钟(p=0.044,p=0.024)和第五分钟(p=0.028,p=0.048),使用 FFTMT 的脉搏值分别高于标准技术组和旋转技术组。此外,FTFTM 组术后咽喉疼痛的发生率略高于标准技术组和旋转技术组(分别为 p=0.389 和 p=0.688):本研究结果表明,与 180° 旋转和 FFTMT 相比,采用传统技术置入 LMA 会产生更一致的血压 (BP) 和脉搏 (PR) 反应。此外,经典方法的 LMA 插入成功率略低于替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Oropharyngeal Stimulation during Laryngeal Mask Insertion on Cardiovascular Response in adult patients. A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study.

Objective: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion has been found to reduce cardiovascular responses when compared to laryngoscopy and intubation. This research aimed to examine the impact of various techniques employed for LMA insertion on cardiovascular response.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 90 elective surgery candidates divided into three groups of 30. All patients underwent similar anesthesia. The LMA was inserted using the classical technique, 180° rotation technique, and face-to-face triple maneuver technique (FFTMT). The cardiovascular responses, the success rate of LMA placement, and other outcomes were documented and compared among the three methods.

Results: The study revealed that the blood pressure of patients 10 minutes after LMA insertion using the rotational technique was higher than the standard technique (p=0.019). The pulse rate in the third (p=0.044, p=0.024) and fifth minutes (p=0.028, p=0.048) following the insertion of LMA demonstrated higher values when utilizing the FFTMT than the standard and rotational technique groups, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of sore throat following surgery in the FTFTM group was slightly greater than that observed with the standard and rotation techniques (p=0.389 and p=0.688, respectively).

Conclusion: The findings of the present investigation indicated that implementing the classic technique for LMA placement resulted in a more consistent blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) response than the 180° rotation and FFTMT. Furthermore, the classical method exhibited a marginally lower success rate in terms of LMA insertion than the alternative methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信