交通碰撞与微移动:根据警方报告对个人移动设备和自行车进行比较

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
{"title":"交通碰撞与微移动:根据警方报告对个人移动设备和自行车进行比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> The recent increase in the use of bicycles and personal mobility devices (PMDs), including mostly E-scooters, is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios leading to these injuries is essential to evaluate and improve preventive and protective measures, especially for PMDs, which are often equated with bicycles. The objective of this study is to identify and compare the most common two-party collision scenarios for bicycles and PMDs, and to identify factors affecting injury severity. <em>Method:</em> Crashes involving at least one PMD or one bicycle and another road user were analyzed from the 2019–2022 French police-reported road crashes database. We investigated the rider, the other vehicle, the road, and the crash scenarios characteristics (pre-crash maneuvers, impact zone on vehicles) and their joint effect on injury severity (hospitalization or fatality: yes/no). <em>Results:</em> We included 16,302 bicycle crashes and 4,118 PMD crashes in the analysis. Most of these collisions (75%) were against a car. The most frequent and the most severe collision scenario was the side-on-head for both bicycles (51%) and PMDs (58%); 67% of both bicycles and PMDs were going straight before the collision. Main factors associated with increased injury severity included colliding with a greater size vehicle, age above 50, and riding on roads with a higher speed limit. Bicycles remained at a higher risk of severe injury than PMDs after accounting for adjustment factors. <em>Conclusions:</em> Although collision scenarios appear similar for bicycles and PMDs, differences in other crash characteristics and injury severity suggest that these two modes of transportation should not be equated in crash investigations. <em>Practical implications:</em> These findings emphasize the need to primarily investigate side-on-head collisions with a moving car for both PMDs and bicycles in order to develop, evaluate, and improve protective devices to reduce the risk of injuries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001075/pdfft?md5=69b96bf3ba18f5511692ba8e2d64ee6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524001075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traffic collisions and micromobility: A comparison between personal mobility devices and bicycles based on police reports\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> The recent increase in the use of bicycles and personal mobility devices (PMDs), including mostly E-scooters, is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios leading to these injuries is essential to evaluate and improve preventive and protective measures, especially for PMDs, which are often equated with bicycles. The objective of this study is to identify and compare the most common two-party collision scenarios for bicycles and PMDs, and to identify factors affecting injury severity. <em>Method:</em> Crashes involving at least one PMD or one bicycle and another road user were analyzed from the 2019–2022 French police-reported road crashes database. We investigated the rider, the other vehicle, the road, and the crash scenarios characteristics (pre-crash maneuvers, impact zone on vehicles) and their joint effect on injury severity (hospitalization or fatality: yes/no). <em>Results:</em> We included 16,302 bicycle crashes and 4,118 PMD crashes in the analysis. Most of these collisions (75%) were against a car. The most frequent and the most severe collision scenario was the side-on-head for both bicycles (51%) and PMDs (58%); 67% of both bicycles and PMDs were going straight before the collision. Main factors associated with increased injury severity included colliding with a greater size vehicle, age above 50, and riding on roads with a higher speed limit. Bicycles remained at a higher risk of severe injury than PMDs after accounting for adjustment factors. <em>Conclusions:</em> Although collision scenarios appear similar for bicycles and PMDs, differences in other crash characteristics and injury severity suggest that these two modes of transportation should not be equated in crash investigations. <em>Practical implications:</em> These findings emphasize the need to primarily investigate side-on-head collisions with a moving car for both PMDs and bicycles in order to develop, evaluate, and improve protective devices to reduce the risk of injuries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001075/pdfft?md5=69b96bf3ba18f5511692ba8e2d64ee6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524001075-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:近年来,自行车和个人移动设备(PMDs)(主要包括电动滑板车)的使用率不断上升,与之相关的伤害事故也迅速增加。了解导致这些伤害的主要碰撞情况对于评估和改进预防和保护措施至关重要,尤其是对于通常等同于自行车的个人代步工具。本研究的目的是确定和比较自行车和机动小巴最常见的双方碰撞情况,并确定影响伤害严重程度的因素。研究方法从 2019-2022 年法国警方报告的道路交通事故数据库中,分析了至少涉及一辆 PMD 或一辆自行车和另一位道路使用者的交通事故。我们调查了骑行者、其他车辆、道路和碰撞场景的特征(碰撞前的动作、车辆的撞击区)及其对受伤严重程度(住院或死亡:是/否)的共同影响。结果:我们分析了 16,302 起自行车碰撞事故和 4,118 起 PMD 碰撞事故。在这些碰撞中,大多数(75%)是与汽车相撞。最常见、最严重的碰撞情况是自行车(51%)和 PMD(58%)正面侧面相撞;67%的自行车和 PMD 在碰撞前是直行的。与受伤严重程度增加相关的主要因素包括与更大尺寸的车辆相撞、年龄超过 50 岁以及在限速更高的道路上骑行。在考虑了调整因素后,自行车受重伤的风险仍然高于小型货车。结论:尽管自行车和轻型卡车发生碰撞的情况相似,但其他碰撞特征和受伤严重程度的差异表明,在碰撞调查中不应将这两种交通工具等同起来。实际意义:这些发现强调,有必要主要调查 PMD 和自行车与行驶中的汽车发生侧面对头部碰撞的情况,以便开发、评估和改进保护装置,降低受伤风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traffic collisions and micromobility: A comparison between personal mobility devices and bicycles based on police reports

Introduction: The recent increase in the use of bicycles and personal mobility devices (PMDs), including mostly E-scooters, is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios leading to these injuries is essential to evaluate and improve preventive and protective measures, especially for PMDs, which are often equated with bicycles. The objective of this study is to identify and compare the most common two-party collision scenarios for bicycles and PMDs, and to identify factors affecting injury severity. Method: Crashes involving at least one PMD or one bicycle and another road user were analyzed from the 2019–2022 French police-reported road crashes database. We investigated the rider, the other vehicle, the road, and the crash scenarios characteristics (pre-crash maneuvers, impact zone on vehicles) and their joint effect on injury severity (hospitalization or fatality: yes/no). Results: We included 16,302 bicycle crashes and 4,118 PMD crashes in the analysis. Most of these collisions (75%) were against a car. The most frequent and the most severe collision scenario was the side-on-head for both bicycles (51%) and PMDs (58%); 67% of both bicycles and PMDs were going straight before the collision. Main factors associated with increased injury severity included colliding with a greater size vehicle, age above 50, and riding on roads with a higher speed limit. Bicycles remained at a higher risk of severe injury than PMDs after accounting for adjustment factors. Conclusions: Although collision scenarios appear similar for bicycles and PMDs, differences in other crash characteristics and injury severity suggest that these two modes of transportation should not be equated in crash investigations. Practical implications: These findings emphasize the need to primarily investigate side-on-head collisions with a moving car for both PMDs and bicycles in order to develop, evaluate, and improve protective devices to reduce the risk of injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信