老年男性的跌倒轨迹:不同年龄段的变化轨迹和未来跌倒风险的预测因素。

Crystal Guo, Kristine E Ensrud, Jane A Cauley, Eric S Orwoll, Peggy M Cawthon
{"title":"老年男性的跌倒轨迹:不同年龄段的变化轨迹和未来跌倒风险的预测因素。","authors":"Crystal Guo, Kristine E Ensrud, Jane A Cauley, Eric S Orwoll, Peggy M Cawthon","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Very little is known about specific trajectories or patterns of falls over time. Using the well-characterized cohort of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), we classified individuals by fall trajectories across age and identified predictors of group assignment based on characteristics at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an analysis sample of 5 976 MrOS participants and 15 years of follow-up data on incident falls, we used group-based trajectory models (PROC TRAJ in SAS) to identify trajectories of change. We assessed the association of baseline characteristics with group assignment using 1-way analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the outcome of the high-risk fall trajectory groups compared to the low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in rates of falls were relatively constant or increasing with 5 distinct groups identified. Mean posterior probabilities for all 5 trajectories were similar and consistently above 0.8 indicating a reasonable model fit. Among the 5 fall trajectory groups, 2 were deemed high risk, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Factors associated with fall risk included body mass index, use of central nervous agents, prior history of diabetes and Parkinson's disease, back pain, grip strength, and physical and mental health scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two distinct groups of high fall risk individuals were identified among 5 trajectory groups, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Statistically significant characteristics for group assignment suggest that future fall risk of older men may be predictable at baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fall Trajectories in Older Men: Trajectories of Change by Age and Predictors for Future Fall Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Crystal Guo, Kristine E Ensrud, Jane A Cauley, Eric S Orwoll, Peggy M Cawthon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glae217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Very little is known about specific trajectories or patterns of falls over time. Using the well-characterized cohort of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), we classified individuals by fall trajectories across age and identified predictors of group assignment based on characteristics at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an analysis sample of 5 976 MrOS participants and 15 years of follow-up data on incident falls, we used group-based trajectory models (PROC TRAJ in SAS) to identify trajectories of change. We assessed the association of baseline characteristics with group assignment using 1-way analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the outcome of the high-risk fall trajectory groups compared to the low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in rates of falls were relatively constant or increasing with 5 distinct groups identified. Mean posterior probabilities for all 5 trajectories were similar and consistently above 0.8 indicating a reasonable model fit. Among the 5 fall trajectory groups, 2 were deemed high risk, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Factors associated with fall risk included body mass index, use of central nervous agents, prior history of diabetes and Parkinson's disease, back pain, grip strength, and physical and mental health scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two distinct groups of high fall risk individuals were identified among 5 trajectory groups, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Statistically significant characteristics for group assignment suggest that future fall risk of older men may be predictable at baseline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512026/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对不同时期跌倒的具体轨迹或模式知之甚少。我们利用男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)中特征明确的队列,按照不同年龄段的跌倒轨迹对个体进行了分类,并根据基线特征确定了组别分配的预测因素:我们利用 5976 名 MrOS 参与者的分析样本和 15 年的跌倒事件随访数据,使用基于群体的轨迹模型(SAS 中的 PROC TRAJ)来确定变化轨迹。我们使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和卡方检验评估了基线特征与组别分配之间的关系。多变量逻辑回归用于分析高风险跌倒轨迹组与低风险组相比的结果:结果:跌倒率的变化相对恒定或呈上升趋势,有五个不同的组别。所有五个轨迹的平均后验概率相似,且始终高于 0.8,表明模型拟合合理。在五组跌倒轨迹中,有两组被认为是高风险组,即跌倒风险急剧上升组和持续高跌倒风险组。与跌倒风险相关的因素包括体重指数、使用中枢神经药物、既往糖尿病史和帕金森病史、背痛、握力以及身心健康评分:在五个轨迹组中发现了两类不同的跌倒高危人群,即跌倒风险急剧增加的人群和跌倒风险持续较高的人群。具有统计学意义的组别分配特征表明,老年男性未来的跌倒风险在基线时是可以预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fall Trajectories in Older Men: Trajectories of Change by Age and Predictors for Future Fall Risk.

Background: Very little is known about specific trajectories or patterns of falls over time. Using the well-characterized cohort of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), we classified individuals by fall trajectories across age and identified predictors of group assignment based on characteristics at baseline.

Methods: Using an analysis sample of 5 976 MrOS participants and 15 years of follow-up data on incident falls, we used group-based trajectory models (PROC TRAJ in SAS) to identify trajectories of change. We assessed the association of baseline characteristics with group assignment using 1-way analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the outcome of the high-risk fall trajectory groups compared to the low-risk groups.

Results: Changes in rates of falls were relatively constant or increasing with 5 distinct groups identified. Mean posterior probabilities for all 5 trajectories were similar and consistently above 0.8 indicating a reasonable model fit. Among the 5 fall trajectory groups, 2 were deemed high risk, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Factors associated with fall risk included body mass index, use of central nervous agents, prior history of diabetes and Parkinson's disease, back pain, grip strength, and physical and mental health scores.

Conclusions: Two distinct groups of high fall risk individuals were identified among 5 trajectory groups, those with steeply increasing fall risk and persistently high fall risk. Statistically significant characteristics for group assignment suggest that future fall risk of older men may be predictable at baseline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信