研究、循证实践和质量改进的区分与整合。

Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Julee Briscoe Waldrop, Tracy L Brewer, Rosalie O Mainous
{"title":"研究、循证实践和质量改进的区分与整合。","authors":"Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Julee Briscoe Waldrop, Tracy L Brewer, Rosalie O Mainous","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240514-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substantial discrepancies exist in how research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement (QI) are taught to nursing students across academic levels. As nursing education programs adopt the new The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and move toward competency-based education, prelicensure and advanced nursing students will need to demonstrate research, EBP, and QI competencies; therefore, faculty must possess the knowledge and skills to teach these paradigms' differences and integration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An evidence-based approach that builds on the literature and our experience as nurses and educators was used to develop this educational innovation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An innovative representation in table and figure format of the differences and interdependence of research, EBP, and QI is presented herein.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These documents clarify the evolving differences, similarities, and synergies as a framework for faculty development. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation and Integration of Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Julee Briscoe Waldrop, Tracy L Brewer, Rosalie O Mainous\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20240514-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substantial discrepancies exist in how research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement (QI) are taught to nursing students across academic levels. As nursing education programs adopt the new The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and move toward competency-based education, prelicensure and advanced nursing students will need to demonstrate research, EBP, and QI competencies; therefore, faculty must possess the knowledge and skills to teach these paradigms' differences and integration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An evidence-based approach that builds on the literature and our experience as nurses and educators was used to develop this educational innovation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An innovative representation in table and figure format of the differences and interdependence of research, EBP, and QI is presented herein.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These documents clarify the evolving differences, similarities, and synergies as a framework for faculty development. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240514-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240514-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同学术水平的护理专业学生在学习研究、循证实践(EBP)和质量改进(QI)方面存在很大差异。随着护理教育计划采用新的《专业护理教育核心能力》(The Essentials:专业护理教育核心能力》(The Essential: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education),并转向能力本位教育,执照前和高级护理学生将需要展示研究、循证实践和质量改进能力;因此,教师必须掌握教授这些范例的差异和整合的知识和技能:方法:在文献和我们作为护士和教育工作者的经验基础上,我们采用了循证方法来开发这一教育创新:结果:本文以表格和图表的形式创新性地展示了研究、EBP 和 QI 的差异和相互依存性:这些文件阐明了不断发展的差异、相似性和协同作用,是教师发展的框架。[J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiation and Integration of Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement.

Background: Substantial discrepancies exist in how research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement (QI) are taught to nursing students across academic levels. As nursing education programs adopt the new The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and move toward competency-based education, prelicensure and advanced nursing students will need to demonstrate research, EBP, and QI competencies; therefore, faculty must possess the knowledge and skills to teach these paradigms' differences and integration.

Method: An evidence-based approach that builds on the literature and our experience as nurses and educators was used to develop this educational innovation.

Results: An innovative representation in table and figure format of the differences and interdependence of research, EBP, and QI is presented herein.

Conclusion: These documents clarify the evolving differences, similarities, and synergies as a framework for faculty development. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信