关于扁桃体周围脓肿治疗和对五联扁桃体切除术的态度的全国调查。

Raviv Allon, Elchanan Zloczower, Maxim Chebotaryov, Sapir Pinhas, Yonatan Lahav, Yael Shapira-Galitz
{"title":"关于扁桃体周围脓肿治疗和对五联扁桃体切除术的态度的全国调查。","authors":"Raviv Allon, Elchanan Zloczower, Maxim Chebotaryov, Sapir Pinhas, Yonatan Lahav, Yael Shapira-Galitz","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common deep neck infection traditionally managed with conservative measures. Quinsy Tonsillectomy (QT) is recognized as a definitive treatment but remains variably utilized. We aimed to investigate PTA management strategies and attitudes toward QT among otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to members of the local national Society of Otolaryngology, evaluating treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 otolaryngologists responded (response rate: 30.8%). Participants preferred to treat PTA patients as inpatients (89%) and predominantly offered incision and drainage (I&D) as the first (90.7%) and subsequent (98.1%) treatment plan. QT was favored as a primary treatment only in 1.9% of responders. QT adoption increased with multiple I&D failures, reaching 95.3% after four attempts. In patients with recurrent PTA or tonsillitis, 84.2% preferred I&D follows by interval elective tonsillectomy, while 15% considered QT. The most common reason (72.2%) to avoid QT was the perception of a high perioperative risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I&D was favored for initial PTA treatment. QT is considered after multiple failed I&D attempts, and its use is limited as a primary treatment, mainly due to concerns regarding perioperative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National survey on peritonsillar abscess treatment and attitudes toward quinsy tonsillectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Raviv Allon, Elchanan Zloczower, Maxim Chebotaryov, Sapir Pinhas, Yonatan Lahav, Yael Shapira-Galitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common deep neck infection traditionally managed with conservative measures. Quinsy Tonsillectomy (QT) is recognized as a definitive treatment but remains variably utilized. We aimed to investigate PTA management strategies and attitudes toward QT among otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to members of the local national Society of Otolaryngology, evaluating treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 otolaryngologists responded (response rate: 30.8%). Participants preferred to treat PTA patients as inpatients (89%) and predominantly offered incision and drainage (I&D) as the first (90.7%) and subsequent (98.1%) treatment plan. QT was favored as a primary treatment only in 1.9% of responders. QT adoption increased with multiple I&D failures, reaching 95.3% after four attempts. In patients with recurrent PTA or tonsillitis, 84.2% preferred I&D follows by interval elective tonsillectomy, while 15% considered QT. The most common reason (72.2%) to avoid QT was the perception of a high perioperative risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I&D was favored for initial PTA treatment. QT is considered after multiple failed I&D attempts, and its use is limited as a primary treatment, mainly due to concerns regarding perioperative risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:扁桃体周围脓肿(PTA)是一种常见的颈部深部感染,传统上采用保守治疗。扁桃体切除术(Quinsy Tonsillectomy,QT)被认为是一种确切的治疗方法,但使用情况仍不尽相同。我们旨在调查耳鼻喉科医生的 PTA 管理策略和对 QT 的态度:我们向当地全国耳鼻喉科学会的成员发放了一份匿名问卷,根据患者特征和临床情况评估治疗策略:结果:共有 108 名耳鼻喉科医生回复了问卷(回复率:30.8%)。参与者倾向于将 PTA 患者作为住院病人进行治疗(89%),并主要将切开引流 (I&D) 作为首次(90.7%)和随后(98.1%)的治疗方案。只有 1.9% 的应答者将 QT 作为主要治疗方法。采用 QT 的比例随着多次 I&D 失败而增加,四次尝试后达到 95.3%。在复发性 PTA 或扁桃体炎患者中,84.2% 的人选择 I&D 后进行间隔性扁桃体切除术,15% 的人考虑 QT。避免 QT 的最常见原因(72.2%)是认为围手术期风险高:结论:在最初的 PTA 治疗中,I&D 更受青睐。结论:PTA 的初始治疗首选 I&D,在多次尝试 I&D 失败后才会考虑 QT,而 QT 作为主要治疗方法的使用受到限制,这主要是由于对围手术期风险的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National survey on peritonsillar abscess treatment and attitudes toward quinsy tonsillectomy.

Objectives: Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common deep neck infection traditionally managed with conservative measures. Quinsy Tonsillectomy (QT) is recognized as a definitive treatment but remains variably utilized. We aimed to investigate PTA management strategies and attitudes toward QT among otolaryngologists.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to members of the local national Society of Otolaryngology, evaluating treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and clinical scenario.

Results: A total of 108 otolaryngologists responded (response rate: 30.8%). Participants preferred to treat PTA patients as inpatients (89%) and predominantly offered incision and drainage (I&D) as the first (90.7%) and subsequent (98.1%) treatment plan. QT was favored as a primary treatment only in 1.9% of responders. QT adoption increased with multiple I&D failures, reaching 95.3% after four attempts. In patients with recurrent PTA or tonsillitis, 84.2% preferred I&D follows by interval elective tonsillectomy, while 15% considered QT. The most common reason (72.2%) to avoid QT was the perception of a high perioperative risk.

Conclusion: I&D was favored for initial PTA treatment. QT is considered after multiple failed I&D attempts, and its use is limited as a primary treatment, mainly due to concerns regarding perioperative risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信