对 HOSPITAL 评分和 LACE 指数进行外部验证和比较分析,以预测澳大利亚社区获得性肺炎住院患者的再入院情况。

Yogesh Sharma, Arduino A Mangoni, Chris Horwood, Campbell Thompson
{"title":"对 HOSPITAL 评分和 LACE 指数进行外部验证和比较分析,以预测澳大利亚社区获得性肺炎住院患者的再入院情况。","authors":"Yogesh Sharma, Arduino A Mangoni, Chris Horwood, Campbell Thompson","doi":"10.1071/AH24204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisations globally and is associated with high readmission rates. Specific score systems developed for all medical conditions such as the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index can also usefully predict CAP readmissions. However, there is limited evidence regarding their performance in the Australian healthcare settings. Methods This multicentre retrospective study analysed adult CAP discharges from two metropolitan hospitals in South Australia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023. Data for determining the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index were derived from electronic medical records. Demographic characteristics of patients readmitted within 30 days were compared with those who were not readmitted. The scores were evaluated for overall performance, discriminatory power and calibration, with discriminatory power assessed using the concordance statistic (C-statistic). Results Over 6years, 7245 CAP discharges were recorded, with 1329 (18.3%) readmissions within 30days. The mean (s.d.) age of the cohort was 74.4 (17.8) years. Readmitted patients were more likely to have multiple morbidities and frailty than those not readmitted (P <0.05). They also had a higher mean number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions in the previous year and a longer initial hospital stay (P <0.05). Overall, the mean (s.d.) HOSPITAL score and LACE index were 3.4 (2.1) and 9.3 (3.6), respectively. Among readmissions, 28.4% occurred in patients with a HOSPITAL score >4 (intermediate and high-risk group), while 25.8% occurred in patients in the high-risk LACE category (LACE index>10). The C-statistic for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index was 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.64) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.61-0.65), respectively, with no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (P >0.05). Conclusions The predictive abilities of the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index for CAP readmissions are modest and comparable in an Australian setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":"656-663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation and comparative analysis of the HOSPITAL score and LACE index for predicting readmissions among patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Yogesh Sharma, Arduino A Mangoni, Chris Horwood, Campbell Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH24204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisations globally and is associated with high readmission rates. Specific score systems developed for all medical conditions such as the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index can also usefully predict CAP readmissions. However, there is limited evidence regarding their performance in the Australian healthcare settings. Methods This multicentre retrospective study analysed adult CAP discharges from two metropolitan hospitals in South Australia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023. Data for determining the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index were derived from electronic medical records. Demographic characteristics of patients readmitted within 30 days were compared with those who were not readmitted. The scores were evaluated for overall performance, discriminatory power and calibration, with discriminatory power assessed using the concordance statistic (C-statistic). Results Over 6years, 7245 CAP discharges were recorded, with 1329 (18.3%) readmissions within 30days. The mean (s.d.) age of the cohort was 74.4 (17.8) years. Readmitted patients were more likely to have multiple morbidities and frailty than those not readmitted (P <0.05). They also had a higher mean number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions in the previous year and a longer initial hospital stay (P <0.05). Overall, the mean (s.d.) HOSPITAL score and LACE index were 3.4 (2.1) and 9.3 (3.6), respectively. Among readmissions, 28.4% occurred in patients with a HOSPITAL score >4 (intermediate and high-risk group), while 25.8% occurred in patients in the high-risk LACE category (LACE index>10). The C-statistic for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index was 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.64) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.61-0.65), respectively, with no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (P >0.05). Conclusions The predictive abilities of the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index for CAP readmissions are modest and comparable in an Australian setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"656-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在全球范围内,社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是急诊住院的主要原因之一,并与较高的再入院率有关。HOSPITAL 评分和 LACE 指数等针对所有医疗状况开发的特定评分系统也能有效预测 CAP 再入院率。然而,有关它们在澳大利亚医疗环境中的表现的证据却很有限。方法这项多中心回顾性研究分析了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间南澳大利亚州两家大都市医院的成人 CAP 出院病例。用于确定 HOSPITAL 评分和 LACE 指数的数据来自电子病历。对 30 天内再次入院的患者与未再次入院的患者的人口统计学特征进行了比较。结果6年来共记录了7245例CAP出院病例,其中1329例(18.3%)在30天内再次入院。患者的平均年龄(s.d.)为 74.4(17.8)岁。与未再入院的患者相比,再入院患者更有可能患有多种疾病和体质虚弱(P4(中高危组)),而 25.8% 的患者属于高危 LACE 类别(LACE 指数大于 10)。HOSPITAL 评分和 LACE 指数的 C 统计量分别为 0.62(95% CI 0.61-0.64)和 0.63(95% CI 0.61-0.65),接收者操作特征曲线下面积无显著差异(P>0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External validation and comparative analysis of the HOSPITAL score and LACE index for predicting readmissions among patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia in Australia.

Objective Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisations globally and is associated with high readmission rates. Specific score systems developed for all medical conditions such as the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index can also usefully predict CAP readmissions. However, there is limited evidence regarding their performance in the Australian healthcare settings. Methods This multicentre retrospective study analysed adult CAP discharges from two metropolitan hospitals in South Australia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023. Data for determining the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index were derived from electronic medical records. Demographic characteristics of patients readmitted within 30 days were compared with those who were not readmitted. The scores were evaluated for overall performance, discriminatory power and calibration, with discriminatory power assessed using the concordance statistic (C-statistic). Results Over 6years, 7245 CAP discharges were recorded, with 1329 (18.3%) readmissions within 30days. The mean (s.d.) age of the cohort was 74.4 (17.8) years. Readmitted patients were more likely to have multiple morbidities and frailty than those not readmitted (P <0.05). They also had a higher mean number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions in the previous year and a longer initial hospital stay (P <0.05). Overall, the mean (s.d.) HOSPITAL score and LACE index were 3.4 (2.1) and 9.3 (3.6), respectively. Among readmissions, 28.4% occurred in patients with a HOSPITAL score >4 (intermediate and high-risk group), while 25.8% occurred in patients in the high-risk LACE category (LACE index>10). The C-statistic for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index was 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.64) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.61-0.65), respectively, with no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (P >0.05). Conclusions The predictive abilities of the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index for CAP readmissions are modest and comparable in an Australian setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信