抗氧化酶在口腔鳞状细胞癌发病机制中的作用:系统综述与元分析

Zainab Niazi, Farah Farhan, Sadia Muneer, Hasan Mujtaba, Nurul Ibrahim, Norhayati Yusop
{"title":"抗氧化酶在口腔鳞状细胞癌发病机制中的作用:系统综述与元分析","authors":"Zainab Niazi, Farah Farhan, Sadia Muneer, Hasan Mujtaba, Nurul Ibrahim, Norhayati Yusop","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the antioxidant enzyme status in biological samples of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and compare them with biological samples of healthy people through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antioxidant enzymes of catalase (CAT), sodium dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxide (GPx) were included in the analysis. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library databases for studies published between January 1999 and December 2022. A total of 831 articles were selected, of which 131 were found to be relevant. Finally, the full texts of 12 studies were screened and included. Studies that evaluated other antioxidant enzymes were excluded. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was derived to conduct a meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis v3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). A random effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect size. P < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAT levels were measured in eight studies (n &#61; 567) and the mean values for the OSCC and control groups were 4.81 ± 2.57 and 10.02 ± 1.81, respectively (SMD 3.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42; P &#61; 0.001). SOD level was evaluated in 11 studies (n &#61; 762) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 3.78 ± 1.45 and 7.34 ± 1.79, respectively (SMD 3.66, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.94; P &#61; 0.001). GPx level was evaluated in 10 studies (n &#61; 697) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 13.33 ± 1.42 and 16.54 ± 2.9, respectively (SMD 1.91, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.77; P &#61; 0.001). The heterogeneity between the studies was severe (I2 ≥ 90%). The risk of bias between studies was low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis revealed that the levels of antioxidant enzymes decreased in biological samples of patients with OSSC as compared to healthy controls. Understanding the pathological progress of OSCC by analysing the level of antioxidant enzymes is beneficial in formulating a personalised, targeted pro-oxidant therapy for cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74983,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","volume":"27 3","pages":"243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Antioxidant Enzymes in Pathogenesis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Niazi, Farah Farhan, Sadia Muneer, Hasan Mujtaba, Nurul Ibrahim, Norhayati Yusop\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the antioxidant enzyme status in biological samples of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and compare them with biological samples of healthy people through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antioxidant enzymes of catalase (CAT), sodium dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxide (GPx) were included in the analysis. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library databases for studies published between January 1999 and December 2022. A total of 831 articles were selected, of which 131 were found to be relevant. Finally, the full texts of 12 studies were screened and included. Studies that evaluated other antioxidant enzymes were excluded. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was derived to conduct a meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis v3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). A random effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect size. P < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAT levels were measured in eight studies (n &#61; 567) and the mean values for the OSCC and control groups were 4.81 ± 2.57 and 10.02 ± 1.81, respectively (SMD 3.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42; P &#61; 0.001). SOD level was evaluated in 11 studies (n &#61; 762) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 3.78 ± 1.45 and 7.34 ± 1.79, respectively (SMD 3.66, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.94; P &#61; 0.001). GPx level was evaluated in 10 studies (n &#61; 697) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 13.33 ± 1.42 and 16.54 ± 2.9, respectively (SMD 1.91, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.77; P &#61; 0.001). The heterogeneity between the studies was severe (I2 ≥ 90%). The risk of bias between studies was low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis revealed that the levels of antioxidant enzymes decreased in biological samples of patients with OSSC as compared to healthy controls. Understanding the pathological progress of OSCC by analysing the level of antioxidant enzymes is beneficial in formulating a personalised, targeted pro-oxidant therapy for cancer treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"243-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者生物样本中的抗氧化酶状态,并与健康人的生物样本进行比较:分析包括过氧化氢酶(CAT)、歧化酶钠(SOD)和过氧化谷胱甘肽(GPx)等抗氧化酶。在 PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Wiley Online Library 数据库中对 1999 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间发表的研究进行了文献检索。共选取了 831 篇文章,发现其中 131 篇与研究相关。最后,筛选并纳入了 12 项研究的全文。排除了评估其他抗氧化酶的研究。使用综合荟萃分析 v3(Biostat,Englewood,NJ,USA)得出标准化平均差(SMD),进行荟萃分析。采用带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的随机效应模型来估计效应大小。结果:八项研究(n =;567)测量了 CAT 水平,OSCC 组和对照组的平均值分别为 4.81 ± 2.57 和 10.02 ± 1.81(SMD 3.18,95% CI 1.01 至 1.42;P =;0.001)。有 11 项研究(n =;762)评估了 SOD 水平,OSCC 组和对照组的 SOD 值分别为 3.78 ± 1.45 和 7.34 ± 1.79(SMD 3.66,95% CI 1.51 至 1.94;P =;0.001)。有 10 项研究(n =;697)对 GPx 水平进行了评估,OSCC 组和对照组的 GPx 值分别为 13.33 ± 1.42 和 16.54 ± 2.9(SMD 1.91,95% CI 1.34 至 1.77;P =;0.001)。研究之间的异质性非常严重(I2 ≥ 90%)。研究之间的偏倚风险为低度至中度:分析显示,与健康对照组相比,OSSC 患者生物样本中的抗氧化酶水平有所下降。通过分析抗氧化酶的水平来了解OSCC的病理进展,有利于制定个性化、有针对性的抗氧化疗法来治疗癌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Antioxidant Enzymes in Pathogenesis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: To investigate the antioxidant enzyme status in biological samples of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and compare them with biological samples of healthy people through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Antioxidant enzymes of catalase (CAT), sodium dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxide (GPx) were included in the analysis. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library databases for studies published between January 1999 and December 2022. A total of 831 articles were selected, of which 131 were found to be relevant. Finally, the full texts of 12 studies were screened and included. Studies that evaluated other antioxidant enzymes were excluded. Standardised mean difference (SMD) was derived to conduct a meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis v3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). A random effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect size. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: CAT levels were measured in eight studies (n = 567) and the mean values for the OSCC and control groups were 4.81 ± 2.57 and 10.02 ± 1.81, respectively (SMD 3.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42; P = 0.001). SOD level was evaluated in 11 studies (n = 762) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 3.78 ± 1.45 and 7.34 ± 1.79, respectively (SMD 3.66, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.94; P = 0.001). GPx level was evaluated in 10 studies (n = 697) and the values for the OSCC and control groups were 13.33 ± 1.42 and 16.54 ± 2.9, respectively (SMD 1.91, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.77; P = 0.001). The heterogeneity between the studies was severe (I2 ≥ 90%). The risk of bias between studies was low to moderate.

Conclusion: Analysis revealed that the levels of antioxidant enzymes decreased in biological samples of patients with OSSC as compared to healthy controls. Understanding the pathological progress of OSCC by analysing the level of antioxidant enzymes is beneficial in formulating a personalised, targeted pro-oxidant therapy for cancer treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信