来自赞比亚现代待产之家使用者的社区声音。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1444611
Melvin Kunda Mwansa, Kafiswe Chimpinde, Mergan Naidoo
{"title":"来自赞比亚现代待产之家使用者的社区声音。","authors":"Melvin Kunda Mwansa, Kafiswe Chimpinde, Mergan Naidoo","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1444611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand community voices on factors influencing utilisation of MMWHs in Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a mixed method study design in four selected health facilities across Zambia districts between January 2021 and December 2022. Purposeful sampling was used to select study participants using MMWH registers as the sampling frame for mothers who had utilised MMWHs and their spouses. Sampling of participants through face-to-face, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted to saturation in all targeted health facilities Data was transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results found that the comfortable state of the MMWHs, long distances to health facilities, fear of maternal complications, availability and positive attitudes of specialized health personnel, and the information on childcare provided were major factors. Spouses supported their partners using MMWHs due to the quality of care and the availability of modern equipment and furniture. However, some spouses indicated that utilisation of MMWHs has a bearing on a household's financial resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMWHs are a pivotal intervention in improving maternal outcomes. All health facilities had no maternal and newborn complications or deaths over the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1444611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11357907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community voices from modern maternal waiting home users in Zambia.\",\"authors\":\"Melvin Kunda Mwansa, Kafiswe Chimpinde, Mergan Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1444611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand community voices on factors influencing utilisation of MMWHs in Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a mixed method study design in four selected health facilities across Zambia districts between January 2021 and December 2022. Purposeful sampling was used to select study participants using MMWH registers as the sampling frame for mothers who had utilised MMWHs and their spouses. Sampling of participants through face-to-face, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted to saturation in all targeted health facilities Data was transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results found that the comfortable state of the MMWHs, long distances to health facilities, fear of maternal complications, availability and positive attitudes of specialized health personnel, and the information on childcare provided were major factors. Spouses supported their partners using MMWHs due to the quality of care and the availability of modern equipment and furniture. However, some spouses indicated that utilisation of MMWHs has a bearing on a household's financial resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMWHs are a pivotal intervention in improving maternal outcomes. All health facilities had no maternal and newborn complications or deaths over the study period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1444611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11357907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1444611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1444611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解赞比亚社区对影响使用 MMWHs 的因素的看法:本研究旨在了解赞比亚社区对影响使用 MMWHs 的因素的看法:本研究采用混合方法研究设计,于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在赞比亚各地区选定的四家医疗机构进行。在选择研究参与者时,采用了有目的的抽样方法,将使用过 MMWHs 的母亲及其配偶作为抽样框架。通过面对面深入访谈(IDIs)和焦点小组讨论(FGDs)的方式在所有目标医疗机构对参与者进行抽样,直至达到饱和:结果发现,产妇保健工具的舒适度、到医疗机构的路途遥远、对产妇并发症的恐惧、专业医护人员的可用性和积极态度以及所提供的育儿信息是主要因素。配偶支持其伴侣使用孕产妇和新生儿保健箱,因为保健质量高,而且有现代化的设备和家具。然而,一些配偶表示,使用产妇保健工具会影响家庭的经济来源:结论:孕产妇和新生儿保健是改善孕产妇预后的关键干预措施。在研究期间,所有医疗机构均未发生孕产妇和新生儿并发症或死亡事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community voices from modern maternal waiting home users in Zambia.

Objective: This study aimed to understand community voices on factors influencing utilisation of MMWHs in Zambia.

Methods: The study employed a mixed method study design in four selected health facilities across Zambia districts between January 2021 and December 2022. Purposeful sampling was used to select study participants using MMWH registers as the sampling frame for mothers who had utilised MMWHs and their spouses. Sampling of participants through face-to-face, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted to saturation in all targeted health facilities Data was transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

Results: Results found that the comfortable state of the MMWHs, long distances to health facilities, fear of maternal complications, availability and positive attitudes of specialized health personnel, and the information on childcare provided were major factors. Spouses supported their partners using MMWHs due to the quality of care and the availability of modern equipment and furniture. However, some spouses indicated that utilisation of MMWHs has a bearing on a household's financial resources.

Conclusion: MMWHs are a pivotal intervention in improving maternal outcomes. All health facilities had no maternal and newborn complications or deaths over the study period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信