在全国社会生活、健康和老龄化项目(NSHAP)第四轮中亲自和远程测量认知功能。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kelly Pudelek, L Philip Schumm, Jennifer Hanis-Martin, Melissa Howe, Terese Schwartzman
{"title":"在全国社会生活、健康和老龄化项目(NSHAP)第四轮中亲自和远程测量认知功能。","authors":"Kelly Pudelek, L Philip Schumm, Jennifer Hanis-Martin, Melissa Howe, Terese Schwartzman","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper describes the changes made to the collection of cognitive measures when the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) introduced remote modes of data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Round 4 (2021-23), the longitudinal study transitioned from being conducted in-person to collecting data via multiple modes including in-person and remote modes: web, phone, and paper-and-pencil. The team began with the measures used in Rounds 2 and 3 of NSHAP-the survey-adapted Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-SA)-and evaluated which measures could be administered remotely, introducing new measures for each cognitive subdomain, as needed, to compensate for items that could not be administered remotely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive items used in Rounds 2 and 3 that could not be administered remotely were dropped from the respective modes, and items selected from the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center's (RADC) global cognition battery were added as substitutes. For comparison, the RADC substitute items were added to the in-person mode making it longer in R4.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The changes in cognitive measures resulted in different numbers of cognitive items across the four modes of survey administration in Round 4. Analysts should be aware of these changes when creating a single global cognition score for the entire NSHAP sample in Round 4, and aware that there may be mode effects that could impact cognition scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Cognitive Function In-Person and Remotely in Round 4 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP).\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Pudelek, L Philip Schumm, Jennifer Hanis-Martin, Melissa Howe, Terese Schwartzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geronb/gbae149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper describes the changes made to the collection of cognitive measures when the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) introduced remote modes of data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Round 4 (2021-23), the longitudinal study transitioned from being conducted in-person to collecting data via multiple modes including in-person and remote modes: web, phone, and paper-and-pencil. The team began with the measures used in Rounds 2 and 3 of NSHAP-the survey-adapted Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-SA)-and evaluated which measures could be administered remotely, introducing new measures for each cognitive subdomain, as needed, to compensate for items that could not be administered remotely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive items used in Rounds 2 and 3 that could not be administered remotely were dropped from the respective modes, and items selected from the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center's (RADC) global cognition battery were added as substitutes. For comparison, the RADC substitute items were added to the in-person mode making it longer in R4.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The changes in cognitive measures resulted in different numbers of cognitive items across the four modes of survey administration in Round 4. Analysts should be aware of these changes when creating a single global cognition score for the entire NSHAP sample in Round 4, and aware that there may be mode effects that could impact cognition scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae149\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文介绍了国家社会生活、健康和老龄化项目(NSHAP)引入远程数据收集模式后对认知测量数据收集所做的改变:本文介绍了国家社会生活、健康和老龄化项目(NSHAP)在引入远程数据收集模式时对认知测量的收集所做的改变:在第 4 轮(2021-23 年)中,纵向研究从面对面进行过渡到通过多种方式收集数据,包括面对面和远程方式:网络、电话和纸笔。研究小组从《国家人类健康行动计划》第二轮和第三轮使用的测量方法--经调查改编的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA-SA)--开始,评估哪些测量方法可以远程管理,并根据需要为每个认知子域引入新的测量方法,以弥补无法远程管理的项目:第二轮和第三轮中使用的认知测试项目如果无法进行远程管理,则从相应的模式中删除,并添加从拉什阿尔茨海默病中心(RADC)全球认知测试中选取的项目作为替代。为了便于比较,在 R4.Discussion 中将 RADC 替代项目添加到了面对面模式中,使其变得更长:认知测量的变化导致第四轮调查中四种调查方式的认知项目数量不同。分析人员在第 4 轮为整个 NSHAP 样本创建单一的总体认知分数时应注意这些变化,并意识到可能会有模式效应影响认知分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Cognitive Function In-Person and Remotely in Round 4 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP).

Objectives: This paper describes the changes made to the collection of cognitive measures when the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) introduced remote modes of data collection.

Methods: In Round 4 (2021-23), the longitudinal study transitioned from being conducted in-person to collecting data via multiple modes including in-person and remote modes: web, phone, and paper-and-pencil. The team began with the measures used in Rounds 2 and 3 of NSHAP-the survey-adapted Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-SA)-and evaluated which measures could be administered remotely, introducing new measures for each cognitive subdomain, as needed, to compensate for items that could not be administered remotely.

Results: Cognitive items used in Rounds 2 and 3 that could not be administered remotely were dropped from the respective modes, and items selected from the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center's (RADC) global cognition battery were added as substitutes. For comparison, the RADC substitute items were added to the in-person mode making it longer in R4.

Discussion: The changes in cognitive measures resulted in different numbers of cognitive items across the four modes of survey administration in Round 4. Analysts should be aware of these changes when creating a single global cognition score for the entire NSHAP sample in Round 4, and aware that there may be mode effects that could impact cognition scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信