左心室血栓患者的临床表型和预后:无监督聚类分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aloysius S T Leow, Fang Qin Goh, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Jamie S Y Ho, William K F Kong, Roger S Y Foo, Mark Y Y Chan, Leonard L L Yeo, Ping Chai, A Geru, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Siew Pang Chan, Xin Zhou, Gregory Y H Lip, Ching-Hui Sia
{"title":"左心室血栓患者的临床表型和预后:无监督聚类分析","authors":"Aloysius S T Leow, Fang Qin Goh, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Jamie S Y Ho, William K F Kong, Roger S Y Foo, Mark Y Y Chan, Leonard L L Yeo, Ping Chai, A Geru, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Siew Pang Chan, Xin Zhou, Gregory Y H Lip, Ching-Hui Sia","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) can develop in a diverse group of patients with various underlying causes, resulting in divergent natural histories and trajectories with treatment. Our aim was to use cluster analysis to identify unique clinical profiles among patients with LVT and then compare their clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study involving 472 patients with LVT whose data were extracted from a tertiary center's echocardiography database, from March 2011 to January 2021. We used the TwoStep cluster analysis method, examining 19 variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis of the 472 patients with LVT revealed two distinct patient clusters. Cluster 1, comprising 247 individuals (52.3%), was characterized by younger patients with a lower incidence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and relatively fewer comorbidities compared with Cluster 2. Most patients had LVT attributed to an underlying ischemic condition, with a larger proportion being due to post-acute myocardial infarction in Cluster 1 (68.8%), and due to ischemic cardiomyopathy in Cluster 2 (57.8%). Notably, patients in Cluster 2 exhibited a reduced likelihood of LVT resolution (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.77, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.43-3.60, p = 0.001). These associations persisted even after adjusting for variables such as anticoagulation treatment, the presence of left ventricular aneurysms, and specific LVT characteristics such as mobility, protrusion, and size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through TwoStep cluster analysis, we identified two distinct clinical phenotypes among patients with LVT, each distinguished by unique baseline clinical attributes and varying prognoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical phenotypes and outcomes of patients with left ventricular thrombus: an unsupervised cluster analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aloysius S T Leow, Fang Qin Goh, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Jamie S Y Ho, William K F Kong, Roger S Y Foo, Mark Y Y Chan, Leonard L L Yeo, Ping Chai, A Geru, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Siew Pang Chan, Xin Zhou, Gregory Y H Lip, Ching-Hui Sia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) can develop in a diverse group of patients with various underlying causes, resulting in divergent natural histories and trajectories with treatment. Our aim was to use cluster analysis to identify unique clinical profiles among patients with LVT and then compare their clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study involving 472 patients with LVT whose data were extracted from a tertiary center's echocardiography database, from March 2011 to January 2021. We used the TwoStep cluster analysis method, examining 19 variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis of the 472 patients with LVT revealed two distinct patient clusters. Cluster 1, comprising 247 individuals (52.3%), was characterized by younger patients with a lower incidence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and relatively fewer comorbidities compared with Cluster 2. Most patients had LVT attributed to an underlying ischemic condition, with a larger proportion being due to post-acute myocardial infarction in Cluster 1 (68.8%), and due to ischemic cardiomyopathy in Cluster 2 (57.8%). Notably, patients in Cluster 2 exhibited a reduced likelihood of LVT resolution (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.77, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.43-3.60, p = 0.001). These associations persisted even after adjusting for variables such as anticoagulation treatment, the presence of left ventricular aneurysms, and specific LVT characteristics such as mobility, protrusion, and size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through TwoStep cluster analysis, we identified two distinct clinical phenotypes among patients with LVT, each distinguished by unique baseline clinical attributes and varying prognoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心室血栓(LVT)可发生在不同的患者群体中,其潜在病因各不相同,因此自然病史和治疗轨迹也各不相同。我们的目的是利用聚类分析确定 LVT 患者的独特临床特征,然后比较他们的临床特征、治疗策略和结果:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,涉及 472 名左心室颤动患者,研究数据来自一家三级中心的超声心动图数据库,时间跨度为 2011 年 3 月至 2021 年 1 月。我们采用了两步聚类分析法,研究了19个变量:我们对 472 名左心室颤动患者的分析显示出两个不同的患者集群。聚类 1 包括 247 人(52.3%),与聚类 2 相比,聚类 1 的特点是患者较年轻,传统心血管风险因素发生率较低,合并症相对较少。大多数患者的 LVT 都是由潜在的缺血性疾病引起的,群组 1 中因急性心肌梗死后引起 LVT 的比例较大(68.8%),群组 2 中因缺血性心肌病引起 LVT 的比例较大(57.8%)。值得注意的是,群组 2 患者的 LVT 解救可能性降低(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.44 - 0.77,p < 0.001),全因死亡风险升高(HR 2.27,95% CI 1.43 - 3.60,p = 0.001)。即使在调整了抗凝治疗、是否存在左心室动脉瘤以及左心室室间隔缺损的具体特征(如活动度、突出度和大小)等变量后,这些关联仍然存在:通过 TwoStep 聚类分析,我们在左心室畸形患者中发现了两种不同的临床表型,每种表型都有独特的基线临床属性和不同的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical phenotypes and outcomes of patients with left ventricular thrombus: an unsupervised cluster analysis.

Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) can develop in a diverse group of patients with various underlying causes, resulting in divergent natural histories and trajectories with treatment. Our aim was to use cluster analysis to identify unique clinical profiles among patients with LVT and then compare their clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 472 patients with LVT whose data were extracted from a tertiary center's echocardiography database, from March 2011 to January 2021. We used the TwoStep cluster analysis method, examining 19 variables.

Results: Our analysis of the 472 patients with LVT revealed two distinct patient clusters. Cluster 1, comprising 247 individuals (52.3%), was characterized by younger patients with a lower incidence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and relatively fewer comorbidities compared with Cluster 2. Most patients had LVT attributed to an underlying ischemic condition, with a larger proportion being due to post-acute myocardial infarction in Cluster 1 (68.8%), and due to ischemic cardiomyopathy in Cluster 2 (57.8%). Notably, patients in Cluster 2 exhibited a reduced likelihood of LVT resolution (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.77, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.43-3.60, p = 0.001). These associations persisted even after adjusting for variables such as anticoagulation treatment, the presence of left ventricular aneurysms, and specific LVT characteristics such as mobility, protrusion, and size.

Conclusion: Through TwoStep cluster analysis, we identified two distinct clinical phenotypes among patients with LVT, each distinguished by unique baseline clinical attributes and varying prognoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信