利用系统建模促进生理学本科生学习和保留难懂的概念。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1152/advan.00020.2024
Michelle Pauley Murphy, Woei Hung
{"title":"利用系统建模促进生理学本科生学习和保留难懂的概念。","authors":"Michelle Pauley Murphy, Woei Hung","doi":"10.1152/advan.00020.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physiology concepts, such as acid-base balance, may be difficult for students to understand. Systems modeling, a cognitive tool, allows students to visualize their mental model of the problem space to enhance learning and retention. We performed a within-subjects three-period randomized control comparison of systems modeling versus written discussion activities in an undergraduate asynchronous online Anatomy and Physiology II course. Participants (<i>n</i> = 108) were randomized to groups with differing treatment orders across three course units: endocrine, immune, and acid-base balance. Participants demonstrated content understanding through either constructing systems modeling diagrams (M) or written discussion posts (W) in a MWM, MMW, or WMM sequence. For each of three units, student performance was assessed on 6 standardized multiple-choice questions embedded within a 45-question exam. The same 6 questions per unit, 18 questions in total, were again assessed on the 75-question final exam. The groups demonstrated no significant difference in performance in the endocrine unit exam [mean difference (MD) = -0.036]. However, the modeling group outperformed the writing group in the immune unit exam (MD = 0.209) and widened the gap in the acid-base balance unit exam (MD = 0.243). On the final exam, performance was again higher for the modeling group on acid-base balance content, as mean difference increased to 0.306 despite the final exam content for acid-base balance being significantly more difficult compared to other units [modeling: <i>F</i>(2) = 29.882, <i>P</i> < 0.001; writing: <i>F</i>(2) = 25.450, <i>P</i> < 0.001]. These results provide initial evidence that participation in systems modeling activities may enhance student learning of difficult physiology content as evidenced by improved multiple-choice question performance.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Physiology educators often intuitively utilize systems thinking and modeling while teaching difficult concepts. Guiding students in development of their own systems modeling skills by enhancing their visualization of their mental model of the problem space may improve performance on multiple-choice test questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"867-872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using systems modeling to facilitate undergraduate physiology student learning and retention of difficult concepts.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Pauley Murphy, Woei Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00020.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physiology concepts, such as acid-base balance, may be difficult for students to understand. Systems modeling, a cognitive tool, allows students to visualize their mental model of the problem space to enhance learning and retention. We performed a within-subjects three-period randomized control comparison of systems modeling versus written discussion activities in an undergraduate asynchronous online Anatomy and Physiology II course. Participants (<i>n</i> = 108) were randomized to groups with differing treatment orders across three course units: endocrine, immune, and acid-base balance. Participants demonstrated content understanding through either constructing systems modeling diagrams (M) or written discussion posts (W) in a MWM, MMW, or WMM sequence. For each of three units, student performance was assessed on 6 standardized multiple-choice questions embedded within a 45-question exam. The same 6 questions per unit, 18 questions in total, were again assessed on the 75-question final exam. The groups demonstrated no significant difference in performance in the endocrine unit exam [mean difference (MD) = -0.036]. However, the modeling group outperformed the writing group in the immune unit exam (MD = 0.209) and widened the gap in the acid-base balance unit exam (MD = 0.243). On the final exam, performance was again higher for the modeling group on acid-base balance content, as mean difference increased to 0.306 despite the final exam content for acid-base balance being significantly more difficult compared to other units [modeling: <i>F</i>(2) = 29.882, <i>P</i> < 0.001; writing: <i>F</i>(2) = 25.450, <i>P</i> < 0.001]. These results provide initial evidence that participation in systems modeling activities may enhance student learning of difficult physiology content as evidenced by improved multiple-choice question performance.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Physiology educators often intuitively utilize systems thinking and modeling while teaching difficult concepts. Guiding students in development of their own systems modeling skills by enhancing their visualization of their mental model of the problem space may improve performance on multiple-choice test questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"867-872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00020.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00020.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生可能难以理解酸碱平衡等生理学概念。系统建模作为一种认知工具,可以让学生将问题空间的心智模型可视化,从而提高学习效果和记忆力。研究方法我们在本科生异步在线《解剖生理学 II》课程中进行了系统建模与书面讨论活动的三期随机对照比较。参与者(n=108)被随机分配到三个课程单元(内分泌、免疫和酸碱平衡)中不同处理顺序的小组。学员通过构建系统建模图(M)或书面讨论帖(W),以MWM、MMW或WMM顺序展示对内容的理解。结果:在三个单元中的每一个单元,学生的成绩都是通过包含在 45 道题的考试中的六道标准化选择题来评估的。在 75 题的期末考试中,再次对每个单元的六道题(共 18 道题)进行评估。在内分泌单元考试中,两组成绩无明显差异(平均差异,MD=-0.036)。然而,建模组在免疫单元考试中的成绩超过了写作组(MD=0.209),并在酸碱平衡单元考试中拉大了差距(MD=0.243)。在期末考试中,尽管酸碱平衡的期末考试内容与其他单元相比明显更难,但建模组在酸碱平衡内容上的成绩再次高于写作组,平均分差距增至 0.306(建模组:F(2)=29.8;写作组:F(2)=29.8):F(2)=29.882, p结论:这些结果提供了初步证据,证明参与系统建模活动能提高学生对生理学难点内容的学习效果,这体现在选择题成绩的提高上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using systems modeling to facilitate undergraduate physiology student learning and retention of difficult concepts.

Physiology concepts, such as acid-base balance, may be difficult for students to understand. Systems modeling, a cognitive tool, allows students to visualize their mental model of the problem space to enhance learning and retention. We performed a within-subjects three-period randomized control comparison of systems modeling versus written discussion activities in an undergraduate asynchronous online Anatomy and Physiology II course. Participants (n = 108) were randomized to groups with differing treatment orders across three course units: endocrine, immune, and acid-base balance. Participants demonstrated content understanding through either constructing systems modeling diagrams (M) or written discussion posts (W) in a MWM, MMW, or WMM sequence. For each of three units, student performance was assessed on 6 standardized multiple-choice questions embedded within a 45-question exam. The same 6 questions per unit, 18 questions in total, were again assessed on the 75-question final exam. The groups demonstrated no significant difference in performance in the endocrine unit exam [mean difference (MD) = -0.036]. However, the modeling group outperformed the writing group in the immune unit exam (MD = 0.209) and widened the gap in the acid-base balance unit exam (MD = 0.243). On the final exam, performance was again higher for the modeling group on acid-base balance content, as mean difference increased to 0.306 despite the final exam content for acid-base balance being significantly more difficult compared to other units [modeling: F(2) = 29.882, P < 0.001; writing: F(2) = 25.450, P < 0.001]. These results provide initial evidence that participation in systems modeling activities may enhance student learning of difficult physiology content as evidenced by improved multiple-choice question performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Physiology educators often intuitively utilize systems thinking and modeling while teaching difficult concepts. Guiding students in development of their own systems modeling skills by enhancing their visualization of their mental model of the problem space may improve performance on multiple-choice test questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信