二价 BA.4.5 或 BA.1 mRNA 强化疫苗在三个北欧国家免疫力低下人群中的效果比较:一项全国性队列研究。

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mie Agermose Gram , Emilia Myrup Thiesson , Nicklas Pihlström , Jori Perälä , Eero Poukka , Tuija Leino , Rickard Ljung , Niklas Worm Andersson , Anders Hviid
{"title":"二价 BA.4.5 或 BA.1 mRNA 强化疫苗在三个北欧国家免疫力低下人群中的效果比较:一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Mie Agermose Gram ,&nbsp;Emilia Myrup Thiesson ,&nbsp;Nicklas Pihlström ,&nbsp;Jori Perälä ,&nbsp;Eero Poukka ,&nbsp;Tuija Leino ,&nbsp;Rickard Ljung ,&nbsp;Niklas Worm Andersson ,&nbsp;Anders Hviid","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To estimate the effectiveness and waning of the bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death in immunocompromised individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nationwide analyses across Nordic countries from 1 September 2022 to 31 October 2023 using a matched cohort design. Individuals boosted with a BA.4–5 or BA.1 vaccine were matched 1:1 with unboosted individuals. The outcomes of interest were country-combined vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death at day 270 of follow-up. Waning was assessed in 45-day intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 352,762 BA.4–5 and 191,070 BA.1 booster vaccine doses were included. At day 270, the comparative VE against Covid-19-related hospitalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 7.1% to 61.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 42.6% (95% CI, 31.3% to 53.9%) for the BA.1 vaccine compared with matched unboosted. The comparative VE against Covid-19-related death was 53.9% (95% CI, 38.6% to 69.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 57.9% (95% CI, 48.5% to 67.4%) for the BA.1 vaccine.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In immunocompromised individuals, vaccination with bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 booster lowered the risk of Covid-19-related hospitalization and death over a follow-up period of 9 months. The effectiveness was highest during the first months since vaccination with subsequent gradual waning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 106261"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001956/pdfft?md5=7671833fd2a93cfb971be5c9f11db33c&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001956-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among immunocompromised individuals across three Nordic countries: A nationwide cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Mie Agermose Gram ,&nbsp;Emilia Myrup Thiesson ,&nbsp;Nicklas Pihlström ,&nbsp;Jori Perälä ,&nbsp;Eero Poukka ,&nbsp;Tuija Leino ,&nbsp;Rickard Ljung ,&nbsp;Niklas Worm Andersson ,&nbsp;Anders Hviid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To estimate the effectiveness and waning of the bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death in immunocompromised individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nationwide analyses across Nordic countries from 1 September 2022 to 31 October 2023 using a matched cohort design. Individuals boosted with a BA.4–5 or BA.1 vaccine were matched 1:1 with unboosted individuals. The outcomes of interest were country-combined vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death at day 270 of follow-up. Waning was assessed in 45-day intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 352,762 BA.4–5 and 191,070 BA.1 booster vaccine doses were included. At day 270, the comparative VE against Covid-19-related hospitalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 7.1% to 61.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 42.6% (95% CI, 31.3% to 53.9%) for the BA.1 vaccine compared with matched unboosted. The comparative VE against Covid-19-related death was 53.9% (95% CI, 38.6% to 69.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 57.9% (95% CI, 48.5% to 67.4%) for the BA.1 vaccine.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In immunocompromised individuals, vaccination with bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 booster lowered the risk of Covid-19-related hospitalization and death over a follow-up period of 9 months. The effectiveness was highest during the first months since vaccination with subsequent gradual waning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 106261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001956/pdfft?md5=7671833fd2a93cfb971be5c9f11db33c&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001956-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001956\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001956","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的估计二价 BA.4-5 或 BA.1 mRNA 强化疫苗对免疫力低下者因 Covid-19 导致的住院和死亡的有效性和减弱情况:方法:采用匹配队列设计,对北欧国家 2022 年 9 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 31 日期间的全国情况进行分析。接种 BA.4-5 或 BA.1 疫苗的个体与未接种疫苗的个体进行 1:1 配对。关注的结果是在随访的第 270 天,针对与 Covid-19 相关的住院和死亡的国家综合疫苗有效性 (VE) 估计值。每隔 45 天对衰减情况进行评估:共纳入了 352,762 剂 BA.4-5 和 191,070 剂 BA.1 强化疫苗。在第270天,与匹配的未加强疫苗相比,二价BA.4-5疫苗预防Covid-19相关住院的比较VE为34.2%(95% CI,7.1%至61.3%),BA.1疫苗为42.6%(95% CI,31.3%至53.9%)。二价BA.4-5疫苗预防Covid-19相关死亡的比较VE为53.9%(95% CI,38.6%至69.3%),BA.1疫苗为57.9%(95% CI,48.5%至67.4%):结论:在免疫力低下的人群中,接种二价 BA.4-5 或 BA.1 强化疫苗可在 9 个月的随访期内降低与 Covid-19 相关的住院和死亡风险。接种后的头几个月效果最好,随后逐渐减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among immunocompromised individuals across three Nordic countries: A nationwide cohort study

Objectives

To estimate the effectiveness and waning of the bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death in immunocompromised individuals.

Methods

Nationwide analyses across Nordic countries from 1 September 2022 to 31 October 2023 using a matched cohort design. Individuals boosted with a BA.4–5 or BA.1 vaccine were matched 1:1 with unboosted individuals. The outcomes of interest were country-combined vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against Covid-19-related hospitalization and death at day 270 of follow-up. Waning was assessed in 45-day intervals.

Results

A total of 352,762 BA.4–5 and 191,070 BA.1 booster vaccine doses were included. At day 270, the comparative VE against Covid-19-related hospitalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 7.1% to 61.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 42.6% (95% CI, 31.3% to 53.9%) for the BA.1 vaccine compared with matched unboosted. The comparative VE against Covid-19-related death was 53.9% (95% CI, 38.6% to 69.3%) for the bivalent BA.4–5 vaccine and 57.9% (95% CI, 48.5% to 67.4%) for the BA.1 vaccine.

Conclusions

In immunocompromised individuals, vaccination with bivalent BA.4–5 or BA.1 booster lowered the risk of Covid-19-related hospitalization and death over a follow-up period of 9 months. The effectiveness was highest during the first months since vaccination with subsequent gradual waning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信