COVID-19 大流行后埃及正常人群的冲动性及其与抑郁和焦虑的关系。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marwa S Ismael, Marwa O Elgendy, Ammena Y Binsaleh, Asmaa Saleh, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim, Hasnaa Osama
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行后埃及正常人群的冲动性及其与抑郁和焦虑的关系。","authors":"Marwa S Ismael, Marwa O Elgendy, Ammena Y Binsaleh, Asmaa Saleh, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim, Hasnaa Osama","doi":"10.3390/medicina60081367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> It is well known that depression, anxiety, and impulsiveness are interrelated; however, studies that have assessed their association with the coronavirus outbreak are scarce. Hence, our study aimed to evaluate the impulsivity incidence and its correlation with anxiety and depression following COVID-19 infection between November 2022 and June 2023. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The 201 participants completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and short UPPS-P scales (urgency, premeditation, perseverance, sensation seeking, and positive urgency) to allow us to determine their anxiety and depression symptoms, functional impairment, and impulsivity, respectively. <i>Results:</i> Among our respondents, 22%, and 26.7% had moderate to severe anxiety and depression. The short UPPS-P scale significantly correlated with the HAM-A and HDRS scales. Participants with positive COVID-19 infection showed significantly higher functional impairment scores, especially in the work/study domain (mean (SD): 3.12 (2.2) vs. 2.43 (2.3); <i>p</i> = 0.037). COVID-19-related disruption significantly correlated with negative and positive urgency, HAM-A, HDRS, and the SDS total and subscales. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our findings showed a notable increase in anxiety, depression, and functional impairment among the population following COVID-19 infection. Our research highlights the correlation between impulsivity and the psychological distress experienced following the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impulsivity and Its Association with Depression and Anxiety in the Normal Egyptian Population Post COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Marwa S Ismael, Marwa O Elgendy, Ammena Y Binsaleh, Asmaa Saleh, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim, Hasnaa Osama\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina60081367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> It is well known that depression, anxiety, and impulsiveness are interrelated; however, studies that have assessed their association with the coronavirus outbreak are scarce. Hence, our study aimed to evaluate the impulsivity incidence and its correlation with anxiety and depression following COVID-19 infection between November 2022 and June 2023. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The 201 participants completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and short UPPS-P scales (urgency, premeditation, perseverance, sensation seeking, and positive urgency) to allow us to determine their anxiety and depression symptoms, functional impairment, and impulsivity, respectively. <i>Results:</i> Among our respondents, 22%, and 26.7% had moderate to severe anxiety and depression. The short UPPS-P scale significantly correlated with the HAM-A and HDRS scales. Participants with positive COVID-19 infection showed significantly higher functional impairment scores, especially in the work/study domain (mean (SD): 3.12 (2.2) vs. 2.43 (2.3); <i>p</i> = 0.037). COVID-19-related disruption significantly correlated with negative and positive urgency, HAM-A, HDRS, and the SDS total and subscales. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our findings showed a notable increase in anxiety, depression, and functional impairment among the population following COVID-19 infection. Our research highlights the correlation between impulsivity and the psychological distress experienced following the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356745/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081367\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:众所周知,抑郁、焦虑和冲动是相互关联的;然而,评估它们与冠状病毒爆发之间关系的研究却很少。因此,我们的研究旨在评估 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 6 月期间感染 COVID-19 后冲动的发生率及其与焦虑和抑郁的相关性。材料与方法:201 名参与者完成了汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)、希恩残疾量表(SDS)和 UPPS-P 短量表(紧迫感、预谋、坚持、寻求感觉和积极紧迫感),以便我们分别确定他们的焦虑和抑郁症状、功能障碍和冲动性。研究结果在我们的受访者中,分别有 22% 和 26.7% 患有中度至重度焦虑症和抑郁症。简短的 UPPS-P 量表与 HAM-A 和 HDRS 量表有明显的相关性。COVID-19 阳性感染者的功能障碍得分明显更高,尤其是在工作/学习领域(平均值(标清):3.12 (2.2) vs. 2.43 (2.3);P = 0.037)。COVID-19 相关干扰与负性和正性急迫感、HAM-A、HDRS 以及 SDS 总分和分量表明显相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,感染 COVID-19 后,人群中的焦虑、抑郁和功能障碍明显增加。我们的研究强调了冲动与大流行后的心理困扰之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impulsivity and Its Association with Depression and Anxiety in the Normal Egyptian Population Post COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: It is well known that depression, anxiety, and impulsiveness are interrelated; however, studies that have assessed their association with the coronavirus outbreak are scarce. Hence, our study aimed to evaluate the impulsivity incidence and its correlation with anxiety and depression following COVID-19 infection between November 2022 and June 2023. Materials and Methods: The 201 participants completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and short UPPS-P scales (urgency, premeditation, perseverance, sensation seeking, and positive urgency) to allow us to determine their anxiety and depression symptoms, functional impairment, and impulsivity, respectively. Results: Among our respondents, 22%, and 26.7% had moderate to severe anxiety and depression. The short UPPS-P scale significantly correlated with the HAM-A and HDRS scales. Participants with positive COVID-19 infection showed significantly higher functional impairment scores, especially in the work/study domain (mean (SD): 3.12 (2.2) vs. 2.43 (2.3); p = 0.037). COVID-19-related disruption significantly correlated with negative and positive urgency, HAM-A, HDRS, and the SDS total and subscales. Conclusions: Our findings showed a notable increase in anxiety, depression, and functional impairment among the population following COVID-19 infection. Our research highlights the correlation between impulsivity and the psychological distress experienced following the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信