艾滋病病毒感染者转用多拉韦林类抗逆转录病毒疗法的实际有效性和耐受性:一项全国范围的匹配前瞻性队列研究。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Patrick G A Oomen, Ferdinand W N M Wit, Kees Brinkman, Saskia M E Vrouenraets, Tania Mudrikova, Berend J van Welzen, Marc van der Valk
{"title":"艾滋病病毒感染者转用多拉韦林类抗逆转录病毒疗法的实际有效性和耐受性:一项全国范围的匹配前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Patrick G A Oomen, Ferdinand W N M Wit, Kees Brinkman, Saskia M E Vrouenraets, Tania Mudrikova, Berend J van Welzen, Marc van der Valk","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00150-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, real-world data on doravirine are scarce. In a national prospective cohort, we assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of switching to doravirine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a nationwide, matched, prospective cohort study of people with HIV without previous virological failure and stable for at least 12 months on non-doravirine-containing triple or dual ART switching to doravirine before Sept 1, 2020 (exposed group). Participants in the exposed group were matched 1:2 to individuals continuing stable non-doravirine-containing ART, on age, sex, HIV acquisition category, time since ART initiation, calendar time, pre-ART CD4-count, pre-ART plasma viral load (PVL) and anchor drug class before switching. The primary outcome was protocol-defined virological failure (PDVF; PVL of ≥200 copies per mL) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population at week 104, with participants modifying their regimen or becoming lost to follow-up considered as PDVF (non-inferiority margin +5%). In contrast, in the on-treatment population, those who modified their regimen or became lost to follow-up were censored from that moment onwards. Tolerability was a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 590 participants in the exposed group and 1180 participants in the unexposed group (of whom 55·3% used integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens) were included. In the ITT analysis, PDVF occurred in 135 (22·9%) exposed participants and in 295 (25·0%) unexposed participants (risk difference -2·12%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +1·40%). In the on-treatment analysis, 10 (2·2%) of 455 non-censored exposed participants and 26 (2·9%) of 885 non-censored unexposed participants had PDVF (risk difference -0·70%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +0·73%). All exposed participants with a PVL of 200 copies or more per mL resuppressed without regimen modification: no confirmed virological failure (two consecutive PVLs of ≥200 copies per mL) was observed. 104 (17·6%) exposed participants and 211 (17·9%) unexposed participants modified their regimen. 73 (12.4%) exposed participants discontinued doravirine due to adverse events: abnormal dreams (1·7%) and insomnia (1·5%) were most common.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Switching to doravirine in well suppressed people with HIV without previous virological failure was non-inferior compared with continuing non-doravirine-containing regimens after 2 years in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":48725,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Hiv","volume":"11 9","pages":"e576-e585"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of switching to doravirine-based antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV: a nationwide, matched, prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick G A Oomen, Ferdinand W N M Wit, Kees Brinkman, Saskia M E Vrouenraets, Tania Mudrikova, Berend J van Welzen, Marc van der Valk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00150-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, real-world data on doravirine are scarce. In a national prospective cohort, we assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of switching to doravirine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a nationwide, matched, prospective cohort study of people with HIV without previous virological failure and stable for at least 12 months on non-doravirine-containing triple or dual ART switching to doravirine before Sept 1, 2020 (exposed group). Participants in the exposed group were matched 1:2 to individuals continuing stable non-doravirine-containing ART, on age, sex, HIV acquisition category, time since ART initiation, calendar time, pre-ART CD4-count, pre-ART plasma viral load (PVL) and anchor drug class before switching. The primary outcome was protocol-defined virological failure (PDVF; PVL of ≥200 copies per mL) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population at week 104, with participants modifying their regimen or becoming lost to follow-up considered as PDVF (non-inferiority margin +5%). In contrast, in the on-treatment population, those who modified their regimen or became lost to follow-up were censored from that moment onwards. Tolerability was a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 590 participants in the exposed group and 1180 participants in the unexposed group (of whom 55·3% used integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens) were included. In the ITT analysis, PDVF occurred in 135 (22·9%) exposed participants and in 295 (25·0%) unexposed participants (risk difference -2·12%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +1·40%). In the on-treatment analysis, 10 (2·2%) of 455 non-censored exposed participants and 26 (2·9%) of 885 non-censored unexposed participants had PDVF (risk difference -0·70%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +0·73%). All exposed participants with a PVL of 200 copies or more per mL resuppressed without regimen modification: no confirmed virological failure (two consecutive PVLs of ≥200 copies per mL) was observed. 104 (17·6%) exposed participants and 211 (17·9%) unexposed participants modified their regimen. 73 (12.4%) exposed participants discontinued doravirine due to adverse events: abnormal dreams (1·7%) and insomnia (1·5%) were most common.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Switching to doravirine in well suppressed people with HIV without previous virological failure was non-inferior compared with continuing non-doravirine-containing regimens after 2 years in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"e576-e585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00150-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00150-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目前,有关多拉韦林的实际数据很少。在一项全国性前瞻性队列研究中,我们评估了艾滋病病毒感染者转用多拉韦林抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的有效性和耐受性:我们在全国范围内开展了一项匹配的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是在 2020 年 9 月 1 日之前转用多拉韦林治疗的既往未出现病毒学失败且至少在 12 个月内稳定接受非多拉韦林三联或双联抗逆转录病毒疗法的 HIV 感染者(暴露组)。暴露组的参与者与继续稳定接受非含多拉维林抗病毒疗法的患者在年龄、性别、艾滋病感染类别、开始接受抗病毒疗法的时间、日历时间、开始接受抗病毒疗法前的 CD4 细胞数、开始接受抗病毒疗法前的血浆病毒载量 (PVL) 和转药前的锚定药物类别等方面进行 1:2 匹配。在意向治疗(ITT)人群中,主要结果是第104周时方案定义的病毒学失败(PDVF;PVL≥200拷贝/毫升),参与者改变治疗方案或失去随访视为PDVF(非劣效边际+5%)。相比之下,在接受治疗的人群中,那些改变治疗方案或失去随访机会的人从那时起就被剔除了。耐受性是次要结果:共有590名暴露组参与者和1180名未暴露组参与者(其中55%-3%使用整合酶链转移抑制剂治疗方案)被纳入研究。在 ITT 分析中,135 名暴露者(22-9%)和 295 名未暴露者(25-0%)出现了 PDVF(风险差异 -2-12%,单侧 95% CI 上限 +1-40% )。在治疗过程中的分析中,455 名未经删减的暴露参与者中有 10 人(2-2%)和 885 名未经删减的未暴露参与者中有 26 人(2-9%)出现 PDVF(风险差异 -0-70%,单侧 95% CI 上限 +0-73%)。所有 PVL 为 200 拷贝/毫升或以上的暴露参与者都在未修改方案的情况下恢复了病毒抑制:未观察到确诊的病毒学失败(连续两次 PVL ≥ 200 拷贝/毫升)。104(17-6%)名暴露参与者和 211(17-9%)名未暴露参与者修改了治疗方案。73名(12.4%)暴露参与者因不良反应停用了多拉韦林:最常见的不良反应是异常梦境(1-7%)和失眠(1-5%):解读:在真实世界环境中,既往未出现病毒学失败的艾滋病病毒感染者在2年后转用多拉维林治疗与继续使用不含多拉维林的治疗方案相比效果并不差:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of switching to doravirine-based antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV: a nationwide, matched, prospective cohort study.

Background: Currently, real-world data on doravirine are scarce. In a national prospective cohort, we assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of switching to doravirine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people with HIV.

Methods: We did a nationwide, matched, prospective cohort study of people with HIV without previous virological failure and stable for at least 12 months on non-doravirine-containing triple or dual ART switching to doravirine before Sept 1, 2020 (exposed group). Participants in the exposed group were matched 1:2 to individuals continuing stable non-doravirine-containing ART, on age, sex, HIV acquisition category, time since ART initiation, calendar time, pre-ART CD4-count, pre-ART plasma viral load (PVL) and anchor drug class before switching. The primary outcome was protocol-defined virological failure (PDVF; PVL of ≥200 copies per mL) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population at week 104, with participants modifying their regimen or becoming lost to follow-up considered as PDVF (non-inferiority margin +5%). In contrast, in the on-treatment population, those who modified their regimen or became lost to follow-up were censored from that moment onwards. Tolerability was a secondary outcome.

Findings: In total, 590 participants in the exposed group and 1180 participants in the unexposed group (of whom 55·3% used integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens) were included. In the ITT analysis, PDVF occurred in 135 (22·9%) exposed participants and in 295 (25·0%) unexposed participants (risk difference -2·12%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +1·40%). In the on-treatment analysis, 10 (2·2%) of 455 non-censored exposed participants and 26 (2·9%) of 885 non-censored unexposed participants had PDVF (risk difference -0·70%, upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI +0·73%). All exposed participants with a PVL of 200 copies or more per mL resuppressed without regimen modification: no confirmed virological failure (two consecutive PVLs of ≥200 copies per mL) was observed. 104 (17·6%) exposed participants and 211 (17·9%) unexposed participants modified their regimen. 73 (12.4%) exposed participants discontinued doravirine due to adverse events: abnormal dreams (1·7%) and insomnia (1·5%) were most common.

Interpretation: Switching to doravirine in well suppressed people with HIV without previous virological failure was non-inferior compared with continuing non-doravirine-containing regimens after 2 years in a real-world setting.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Hiv
Lancet Hiv IMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASES&-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: The Lancet HIV is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge with an Impact Factor of 16.1. It is dedicated to publishing original research, evidence-based reviews, and insightful features that advocate for change in or illuminates HIV clinical practice. The journal aims to provide a holistic view of the pandemic, covering clinical, epidemiological, and operational disciplines. It publishes content on innovative treatments and the biological research behind them, novel methods of service delivery, and new approaches to confronting HIV/AIDS worldwide. The Lancet HIV publishes various types of content including articles, reviews, comments, correspondences, and viewpoints. It also publishes series that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in HIV. The journal is indexed by several abstracting and indexing services, including Crossref, Embase, Essential Science Indicators, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCIE and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信