24 个国家 50 岁及以上成年人的社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症状的关系:五项前瞻性队列研究的结果。

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"24 个国家 50 岁及以上成年人的社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症状的关系:五项前瞻性队列研究的结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Social inactivity and loneliness positively mediated a small proportion of the association between socioeconomic status and depression, indicating that other approaches in addition to interventions targeting social isolation and loneliness are required to mitigate the risk of depression in older adults. Additionally, the joint effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness highlight the benefits of simultaneous and integrated interventions to reduce the global burden of depression.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X/pdfft?md5=412aa34e9dea043387eb9d7c218215ac&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400134X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Social inactivity and loneliness positively mediated a small proportion of the association between socioeconomic status and depression, indicating that other approaches in addition to interventions targeting social isolation and loneliness are required to mitigate the risk of depression in older adults. Additionally, the joint effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness highlight the benefits of simultaneous and integrated interventions to reduce the global burden of depression.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X/pdfft?md5=412aa34e9dea043387eb9d7c218215ac&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400134X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400134X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抑郁症是导致精神疾病患者死亡的主要原因。有关社会经济地位、社交活动和孤独感与抑郁症之间关系的证据很少。我们旨在确定社会活动和孤独感是否能调节社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关系,以及社会活动、孤独感和社会经济地位对抑郁症的交互或联合关系的程度:在这项基于人群的跨国队列研究中,我们使用了2008年2月15日至2019年2月27日期间24个国家的五项全国代表性调查数据:健康与退休研究(HRS);英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA);欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE);中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS);以及墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)。我们纳入了 50 岁及以上的参与者,他们在基线时报告了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感方面的信息,并且至少接受过两次评估。我们排除了基线时有抑郁症状的参与者、抑郁症状和协变量数据缺失的参与者以及失去随访的参与者。我们使用基于家庭收入、教育和就业状况的潜类分析法将社会经济地位定义为高和低。抑郁症的评估采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)或EURO-D。我们采用 Cox 比例危险模型来估计社会经济地位与抑郁症的关系。我们使用随机效应模型来获得汇总结果。我们探讨了社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感对抑郁症的联合效应和交互效应,并使用因果中介分析探讨了社会活动和孤独感在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的中介作用:我们的研究共纳入了 69 160 名参与者,在中位随访 5 年期间,共有 20 237 名参与者患上了抑郁症,总发病率为每 100 人年 7-2 例(95% CI 4-4-10-0)。与社会经济地位高的参与者相比,社会经济地位低的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总危险比 [HR] 1-34; 95% CI 1-23-1-44)。社会经济地位与抑郁之间的关系由社会活动和孤独感介导的比例分别为 6-12% (1-14-28-45) 和 5-54% (0-71-27-62)。我们只观察到社会经济地位和孤独感与抑郁之间存在明显的乘法交互作用(汇总 HR 0-84;0-79-0-90)。与社会经济地位高、社交活跃且不孤独的参与者相比,社会经济地位低、社交不活跃且孤独的参与者患抑郁症的风险更高(汇总 HR 2-45;2-08-2-82):社会不活跃和孤独在社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关联中起了一小部分正向中介作用,这表明除了针对社会隔离和孤独的干预措施外,还需要其他方法来降低老年人患抑郁症的风险。此外,社会经济地位、社会活动和孤独感的共同作用凸显了同时采取综合干预措施以减轻全球抑郁症负担的益处:国家自然科学基金委员会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depressive symptoms in adults aged 50 years and older across 24 countries: findings from five prospective cohort studies

Background

Depression is the leading cause of mortality among mental health disorders. Evidence about the associations of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness with depression is scarce. We aimed to identify whether social activities and loneliness mediate the association between socioeconomic status and depression, and the extent of interactive or joint relationships between social activities, loneliness, and socioeconomic status on depression.

Methods

In this population-based, cross-national cohort study we used data from five nationally representative surveys across 24 countries between Feb 15, 2008, and Feb 27, 2019: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA); the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS); and the Mexican Health and Ageing Study (MHAS). We included participants who were aged 50 years and older with reported information on socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness at baseline, and who had been assessed at least twice. We excluded participants with depressive symptoms at baseline; those with missing data on depressive symptoms and covariates; and those lost to follow-up. We defined socioeconomic status as high and low using latent class analysis based on family income, education, and employment status. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or EURO-D. We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the association of socioeconomic status with depression. We used random-effects models to obtain pooled results. Joint and interactive effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness on depression were explored, and the mediating roles of social activities and loneliness in the association between socioeconomic status and depression were explored using causal mediation analysis.

Findings

A total of 69 160 participants were included in our study and, during a median follow-up of 5 years, a total of 20 237 participants developed depression with a pooled incidence of 7·2 (95% CI 4·4–10·0) per 100 person-years. Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, those with low socioeconomic status had a higher risk of depression (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·34; 95% CI 1·23–1·44). The proportion of the associations between socioeconomic status and depression mediated by social activities and loneliness were 6·12% (1·14–28·45) and 5·54% (0·71–27·62), respectively. We only observed a significant multiplicative interaction of socioeconomic status and loneliness with depression (pooled HR 0·84; 0·79–0·90). Compared with participants with high socioeconomic status and who were socially active and not lonely, those with low socioeconomic status and who were socially inactive and lonely had a higher risk of depression (pooled HR 2·45; 2·08–2·82).

Interpretation

Social inactivity and loneliness positively mediated a small proportion of the association between socioeconomic status and depression, indicating that other approaches in addition to interventions targeting social isolation and loneliness are required to mitigate the risk of depression in older adults. Additionally, the joint effects of socioeconomic status, social activities, and loneliness highlight the benefits of simultaneous and integrated interventions to reduce the global burden of depression.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信