预测射频消融联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后原发性肝癌预后的提名图。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hai-Hua Shen, Yu-Rong Hong, Wen Xu, Lei Chen, Jun-Min Chen, Zhi-Gen Yang, Cai-Hong Chen
{"title":"预测射频消融联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后原发性肝癌预后的提名图。","authors":"Hai-Hua Shen, Yu-Rong Hong, Wen Xu, Lei Chen, Jun-Min Chen, Zhi-Gen Yang, Cai-Hong Chen","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence and mortality rates of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are high, and the conventional treatment is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, the 3-year survival rate is still low. Further, there are no visual methods to effectively predict their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the factors influencing the prognosis of HCC after RFA and TACE and develop a nomogram prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and follow-up information of 150 patients with HCC treated using RFA and TACE in the Hangzhou Linping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to December 2022 was retrospectively collected and recorded. We examined their prognostic factors using multivariate logistic regression and created a nomogram prognosis prediction model using the R software (version 4.1.2). Internal verification was performed using the bootstrapping technique. The prognostic efficacy of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated using the concordance index (CI), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 patients treated with RFA and TACE, 92 (61.33%) developed recurrence and metastasis. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables, and a predictive model was created. The internal validation results of the model showed a CI of 0.882. The correction curve trend of the prognosis prediction model was always near the diagonal, and the mean absolute error before and after internal validation was 0.021. The area under the curve of the prediction model after internal verification was 0.882 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.820-0.945], with a specificity of 0.828 and sensitivity of 0.656. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 3.552 and <i>P</i> = 0.895. The predictive model demonstrated a satisfactory calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognosis of patients with HCC after RFA and TACE is affected by several factors. The developed prediction model based on the influencing parameters shows a good prognosis predictive efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 8","pages":"2630-2639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nomogram predicting the prognosis of primary liver cancer after radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.\",\"authors\":\"Hai-Hua Shen, Yu-Rong Hong, Wen Xu, Lei Chen, Jun-Min Chen, Zhi-Gen Yang, Cai-Hong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence and mortality rates of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are high, and the conventional treatment is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, the 3-year survival rate is still low. Further, there are no visual methods to effectively predict their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the factors influencing the prognosis of HCC after RFA and TACE and develop a nomogram prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and follow-up information of 150 patients with HCC treated using RFA and TACE in the Hangzhou Linping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to December 2022 was retrospectively collected and recorded. We examined their prognostic factors using multivariate logistic regression and created a nomogram prognosis prediction model using the R software (version 4.1.2). Internal verification was performed using the bootstrapping technique. The prognostic efficacy of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated using the concordance index (CI), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 patients treated with RFA and TACE, 92 (61.33%) developed recurrence and metastasis. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables, and a predictive model was created. The internal validation results of the model showed a CI of 0.882. The correction curve trend of the prognosis prediction model was always near the diagonal, and the mean absolute error before and after internal validation was 0.021. The area under the curve of the prediction model after internal verification was 0.882 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.820-0.945], with a specificity of 0.828 and sensitivity of 0.656. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 3.552 and <i>P</i> = 0.895. The predictive model demonstrated a satisfactory calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognosis of patients with HCC after RFA and TACE is affected by several factors. The developed prediction model based on the influencing parameters shows a good prognosis predictive efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"2630-2639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的发病率和死亡率都很高,常规治疗方法是射频消融(RFA)和经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE),但3年生存率仍然很低。目的:探讨RFA和TACE术后HCC预后的影响因素,并建立提名图预测模型:方法:回顾性收集并记录2020年5月至2022年12月在杭州市临平中医院接受RFA和TACE治疗的150例HCC患者的临床和随访资料。我们使用多元逻辑回归分析了这些患者的预后因素,并使用 R 软件(4.1.2 版)创建了一个提名图预后预测模型。我们使用引导技术进行了内部验证。使用一致性指数(CI)、校准曲线和接收者操作特征曲线评估了提名图预测模型的预后效果:在接受 RFA 和 TACE 治疗的 150 例患者中,92 例(61.33%)出现复发和转移。逻辑回归分析确定了六个变量,并建立了一个预测模型。模型的内部验证结果显示 CI 为 0.882。预后预测模型的校正曲线趋势始终在对角线附近,内部验证前后的平均绝对误差为 0.021。内部验证后预测模型的曲线下面积为 0.882 [95%置信区间(95%CI):0.820-0.945],特异性为 0.828,灵敏度为 0.656。根据 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验,χ 2 = 3.552,P = 0.895。预测模型的校准结果令人满意,决策曲线分析表明了其临床适用性:结论:经过 RFA 和 TACE 治疗的 HCC 患者的预后受到多种因素的影响。根据影响参数建立的预测模型显示出良好的预后预测效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nomogram predicting the prognosis of primary liver cancer after radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Background: The incidence and mortality rates of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are high, and the conventional treatment is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, the 3-year survival rate is still low. Further, there are no visual methods to effectively predict their prognosis.

Aim: To explore the factors influencing the prognosis of HCC after RFA and TACE and develop a nomogram prediction model.

Methods: Clinical and follow-up information of 150 patients with HCC treated using RFA and TACE in the Hangzhou Linping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to December 2022 was retrospectively collected and recorded. We examined their prognostic factors using multivariate logistic regression and created a nomogram prognosis prediction model using the R software (version 4.1.2). Internal verification was performed using the bootstrapping technique. The prognostic efficacy of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated using the concordance index (CI), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Of the 150 patients treated with RFA and TACE, 92 (61.33%) developed recurrence and metastasis. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables, and a predictive model was created. The internal validation results of the model showed a CI of 0.882. The correction curve trend of the prognosis prediction model was always near the diagonal, and the mean absolute error before and after internal validation was 0.021. The area under the curve of the prediction model after internal verification was 0.882 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.820-0.945], with a specificity of 0.828 and sensitivity of 0.656. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, χ 2 = 3.552 and P = 0.895. The predictive model demonstrated a satisfactory calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical applicability.

Conclusion: The prognosis of patients with HCC after RFA and TACE is affected by several factors. The developed prediction model based on the influencing parameters shows a good prognosis predictive efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信