淋巴结清扫术不会影响肿瘤结节转移 I 期和 II 期结直肠癌患者的生存。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Fan He, Shu-Pei Qu, Ye Yuan, Kun Qian
{"title":"淋巴结清扫术不会影响肿瘤结节转移 I 期和 II 期结直肠癌患者的生存。","authors":"Fan He, Shu-Pei Qu, Ye Yuan, Kun Qian","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of the number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) during radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) on overall survival (OS) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between the number of LNDs and OS in patients with tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage I-II CRC undergoing radical resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent radical resection for CRC at a single-center hospital between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of OS at different T stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2850 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for CRC were enrolled. At stage T1, age [<i>P</i> < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.075, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019-1.134] and tumour size (<i>P</i> = 0.021, HR = 3.635, 95%CI: 1.210-10.917) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T2, age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.064, 95%CI: 1.032-1.098) and overall complications (<i>P</i> = 0.012, HR = 2.297, 95%CI: 1.200-4.397) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T3, only age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.047, 95%CI: 1.027-1.066) was an independent risk factor for OS. At stage T4, age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.057, 95%CI: 1.039-1.075) and body mass index (<i>P</i> = 0. 034, HR = 0.941, 95%CI: 0.890-0.995) were independent risk factors for OS. However, there was no association between LNDs and OS in stages I and II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of LDNs did not affect the survival of patients with TNM stages I and II CRC. Therefore, insufficient LNDs should not be a cause for alarm during the surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 8","pages":"2503-2510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymph node dissection does not affect the survival of patients with tumor node metastasis stages I and II colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Fan He, Shu-Pei Qu, Ye Yuan, Kun Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of the number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) during radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) on overall survival (OS) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between the number of LNDs and OS in patients with tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage I-II CRC undergoing radical resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent radical resection for CRC at a single-center hospital between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of OS at different T stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2850 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for CRC were enrolled. At stage T1, age [<i>P</i> < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.075, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019-1.134] and tumour size (<i>P</i> = 0.021, HR = 3.635, 95%CI: 1.210-10.917) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T2, age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.064, 95%CI: 1.032-1.098) and overall complications (<i>P</i> = 0.012, HR = 2.297, 95%CI: 1.200-4.397) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T3, only age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.047, 95%CI: 1.027-1.066) was an independent risk factor for OS. At stage T4, age (<i>P</i> < 0.01, HR = 1.057, 95%CI: 1.039-1.075) and body mass index (<i>P</i> = 0. 034, HR = 0.941, 95%CI: 0.890-0.995) were independent risk factors for OS. However, there was no association between LNDs and OS in stages I and II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of LDNs did not affect the survival of patients with TNM stages I and II CRC. Therefore, insufficient LNDs should not be a cause for alarm during the surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"2503-2510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2503\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:研究接受根治性切除术的肿瘤结节转移(TNM)I-II期CRC患者的淋巴结清扫次数与OS之间的关系:方法:对2011年1月至2021年12月期间在一家单中心医院接受根治性切除术的CRC患者进行回顾性分析。结果:共有2850名患者接受了根治性切除术,其中有1.5%的患者接受了根治性切除术:共有2850名接受腹腔镜根治性切除术的CRC患者入选。在T1期,年龄[P < 0.01,危险比(HR)= 1.075,95%置信区间(CI):1.019-1.134]和肿瘤大小(P = 0.021,HR = 3.635,95%CI:1.210-10.917)是OS的独立危险因素。在T2期,年龄(P < 0.01,HR = 1.064,95%CI:1.032-1.098)和总体并发症(P = 0.012,HR = 2.297,95%CI:1.200-4.397)是OS的独立危险因素。在T3期,只有年龄(P < 0.01,HR = 1.047,95%CI:1.027-1.066)是OS的独立危险因素。在T4期,年龄(P < 0.01,HR = 1.057,95%CI:1.039-1.075)和体重指数(P = 0. 034,HR = 0.941,95%CI:0.890-0.995)是OS的独立危险因素。然而,在I期和II期中,LNDs与OS之间没有关联:结论:LDN的数量不会影响TNM分期为I期和II期的CRC患者的生存率。结论:LDNs数量不会影响TNM分期为I期和II期的CRC患者的生存率,因此在手术过程中,LDNs不足不应引起警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lymph node dissection does not affect the survival of patients with tumor node metastasis stages I and II colorectal cancer.

Background: The effect of the number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) during radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) on overall survival (OS) remains controversial.

Aim: To investigate the association between the number of LNDs and OS in patients with tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage I-II CRC undergoing radical resection.

Methods: Patients who underwent radical resection for CRC at a single-center hospital between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of OS at different T stages.

Results: A total of 2850 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for CRC were enrolled. At stage T1, age [P < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.075, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019-1.134] and tumour size (P = 0.021, HR = 3.635, 95%CI: 1.210-10.917) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T2, age (P < 0.01, HR = 1.064, 95%CI: 1.032-1.098) and overall complications (P = 0.012, HR = 2.297, 95%CI: 1.200-4.397) were independent risk factors for OS. At stage T3, only age (P < 0.01, HR = 1.047, 95%CI: 1.027-1.066) was an independent risk factor for OS. At stage T4, age (P < 0.01, HR = 1.057, 95%CI: 1.039-1.075) and body mass index (P = 0. 034, HR = 0.941, 95%CI: 0.890-0.995) were independent risk factors for OS. However, there was no association between LNDs and OS in stages I and II.

Conclusion: The number of LDNs did not affect the survival of patients with TNM stages I and II CRC. Therefore, insufficient LNDs should not be a cause for alarm during the surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信