Maximilian Oberneder, Thomas Henzler, Martin Kriegmair, Tibor Vag, Matthias Roethke, Sabine Siegert, Roland Lang, Julia Lenk, Joshua Gawlitza
{"title":"利用多参数磁共振成像、双参数磁共振成像和临床参数预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌。","authors":"Maximilian Oberneder, Thomas Henzler, Martin Kriegmair, Tibor Vag, Matthias Roethke, Sabine Siegert, Roland Lang, Julia Lenk, Joshua Gawlitza","doi":"10.1159/000541152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is gold standard for the primary diagnostic work-up of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of the perfusion sequence and the non-inferiority of an MRI without contrast administration (bpMRI) compared to mpMRI while taking clinical parameters into account.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, non-interventional study we examined MRI data from 355 biopsy-naïve patients, performed on a 3T MRI system, evaluated by a board-certified radiologist with over 10 years of experience with subsequent mpMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only 16/355 (4.5%) patients benefited from dynamic contrast enhanced. In only 3/355 (0.8%) patients, csPCa would have been missed in bpMRI. BpMRI provided sensitivity and specificity (81.4%; 79.4%) comparable to mpMRI (75.2%; 81.8%). Additionally, bpMRI and mpMRI were independent predictors for the presence of csPCa, individually (OR: 15.36; p < 0.001 vs. 12.15; p = 0.006) and after accounting for established influencing factors (OR: 12.81; p < 0.001 vs. 6.50; p = 0.012). When clinical parameters were considered, a more balanced diagnostic performance between sensitivity and specificity was found for mpMRI and bpMRI. Overall, PSA density showed the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.81) for the detection of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The premise of the study was confirmed. Therefore, bpMRI should be adopted as soon as existing limitations have been lifted by prospective multi-reader studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI, Biparametric MRI, and Clinical Parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Oberneder, Thomas Henzler, Martin Kriegmair, Tibor Vag, Matthias Roethke, Sabine Siegert, Roland Lang, Julia Lenk, Joshua Gawlitza\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is gold standard for the primary diagnostic work-up of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of the perfusion sequence and the non-inferiority of an MRI without contrast administration (bpMRI) compared to mpMRI while taking clinical parameters into account.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, non-interventional study we examined MRI data from 355 biopsy-naïve patients, performed on a 3T MRI system, evaluated by a board-certified radiologist with over 10 years of experience with subsequent mpMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only 16/355 (4.5%) patients benefited from dynamic contrast enhanced. In only 3/355 (0.8%) patients, csPCa would have been missed in bpMRI. BpMRI provided sensitivity and specificity (81.4%; 79.4%) comparable to mpMRI (75.2%; 81.8%). Additionally, bpMRI and mpMRI were independent predictors for the presence of csPCa, individually (OR: 15.36; p < 0.001 vs. 12.15; p = 0.006) and after accounting for established influencing factors (OR: 12.81; p < 0.001 vs. 6.50; p = 0.012). When clinical parameters were considered, a more balanced diagnostic performance between sensitivity and specificity was found for mpMRI and bpMRI. Overall, PSA density showed the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.81) for the detection of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The premise of the study was confirmed. Therefore, bpMRI should be adopted as soon as existing limitations have been lifted by prospective multi-reader studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)是对有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)进行初步诊断的金标准。本研究旨在评估灌注序列的益处以及不使用造影剂的磁共振成像(bpMRI)与 mpMRI 相比的非劣势,同时考虑临床参数:在这项回顾性、非介入性研究中,我们检查了355名未接受活检患者的磁共振成像数据,这些数据是在3T磁共振成像系统上进行的,由一名拥有10多年经验的放射科医师进行评估,并随后进行了mpMRI-TRUS融合活检:只有16/355(4.5%)名患者受益于DCE。只有 3/355 例(0.8%)患者的 csPCa 会在 bpMRI 中漏诊。bpMRI 的灵敏度和特异性(81.4%;79.4%)与 mpMRI(75.2%;81.8%)相当。此外,bpMRI 和 mpMRI 是预测 csPCa 存在的独立指标,单独预测(OR 15.36; p < 0.001 vs. 12.15; p = 0.006)和考虑既定影响因素后预测(OR 12.81; p < 0.001 vs. 6.50; p = 0.012)。当考虑到临床参数时,发现 mpMRI 和 bpMRI 的灵敏度和特异性之间的诊断性能更为平衡。总体而言,PSA 密度在检测 csPCa 方面显示出最高的诊断性能(AUC = 0,81):结论:本研究的前提得到了证实。因此,一旦前瞻性多读取器研究解除了现有的限制,就应尽快采用 bpMRI。
Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI, Biparametric MRI, and Clinical Parameters.
Introduction: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is gold standard for the primary diagnostic work-up of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of the perfusion sequence and the non-inferiority of an MRI without contrast administration (bpMRI) compared to mpMRI while taking clinical parameters into account.
Methods: In this retrospective, non-interventional study we examined MRI data from 355 biopsy-naïve patients, performed on a 3T MRI system, evaluated by a board-certified radiologist with over 10 years of experience with subsequent mpMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy.
Discussion: Only 16/355 (4.5%) patients benefited from dynamic contrast enhanced. In only 3/355 (0.8%) patients, csPCa would have been missed in bpMRI. BpMRI provided sensitivity and specificity (81.4%; 79.4%) comparable to mpMRI (75.2%; 81.8%). Additionally, bpMRI and mpMRI were independent predictors for the presence of csPCa, individually (OR: 15.36; p < 0.001 vs. 12.15; p = 0.006) and after accounting for established influencing factors (OR: 12.81; p < 0.001 vs. 6.50; p = 0.012). When clinical parameters were considered, a more balanced diagnostic performance between sensitivity and specificity was found for mpMRI and bpMRI. Overall, PSA density showed the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.81) for the detection of csPCa.
Conclusion: The premise of the study was confirmed. Therefore, bpMRI should be adopted as soon as existing limitations have been lifted by prospective multi-reader studies.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.