{"title":"基因变异可预测青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者支架治疗的结果。","authors":"Zhicheng Dai, Kaixing Min, Zhichong Wu, Leilei Xu, Zhenhua Feng, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A genetic case-control study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the association between AIS progression-associated SNPs reported by GWAS studies and the effectiveness of brace treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Bracing is the most effective conservative method to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Several factors have been reported to be associated with bracing failure in AIS patients. Genetic markers associated with AIS have potential prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of AIS patients undergoing brace treatment was enrolled in this study and divided into success and failure groups based on treatment outcome. Clinical characteristics of AIS patients were documented. Candidate SNPs were selected from previous GWAS studies of AIS, which were known to be associated with curve progression and validated across diverse populations. Genotype and allele frequencies between the success and failure groups were compared using χ 2 analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 female AIS patients were included in this study, 30.5% of the well-braced patients had curve progression exceeding 5° and 69.5% of the patients undergo an improvement or progression of <5°. Allele C of rs10738445 ( BNC2 ) could significantly add to the risk of bracing failure, with odds ratio of 1.59. No significant association with bracing outcomes was found for rs12946942 ( SOX9/KCNJ2 ), rs1978060 ( TBX1 ), rs1017861 ( CHD7 ), and rs35333564 ( MIR4300HG ).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNP rs10738445 were significantly associated with brace treatment effectiveness. The other four SNPs were not significantly associated with the outcome of bracing. More SNPs and predictors should be included in future study to develop a more accurate predictive model for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"238-242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Variants Can Predict the Outcome of Brace Treatment in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhicheng Dai, Kaixing Min, Zhichong Wu, Leilei Xu, Zhenhua Feng, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A genetic case-control study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the association between AIS progression-associated SNPs reported by GWAS studies and the effectiveness of brace treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Bracing is the most effective conservative method to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Several factors have been reported to be associated with bracing failure in AIS patients. Genetic markers associated with AIS have potential prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of AIS patients undergoing brace treatment was enrolled in this study and divided into success and failure groups based on treatment outcome. Clinical characteristics of AIS patients were documented. Candidate SNPs were selected from previous GWAS studies of AIS, which were known to be associated with curve progression and validated across diverse populations. Genotype and allele frequencies between the success and failure groups were compared using χ 2 analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 female AIS patients were included in this study, 30.5% of the well-braced patients had curve progression exceeding 5° and 69.5% of the patients undergo an improvement or progression of <5°. Allele C of rs10738445 ( BNC2 ) could significantly add to the risk of bracing failure, with odds ratio of 1.59. No significant association with bracing outcomes was found for rs12946942 ( SOX9/KCNJ2 ), rs1978060 ( TBX1 ), rs1017861 ( CHD7 ), and rs35333564 ( MIR4300HG ).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNP rs10738445 were significantly associated with brace treatment effectiveness. The other four SNPs were not significantly associated with the outcome of bracing. More SNPs and predictors should be included in future study to develop a more accurate predictive model for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"238-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic Variants Can Predict the Outcome of Brace Treatment in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Study design: A genetic case-control study.
Objectives: To investigate the association between AIS progression-associated SNPs reported by GWAS studies and the effectiveness of brace treatment.
Summary of background data: Bracing is the most effective conservative method to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Several factors have been reported to be associated with bracing failure in AIS patients. Genetic markers associated with AIS have potential prognostic value.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of AIS patients undergoing brace treatment was enrolled in this study and divided into success and failure groups based on treatment outcome. Clinical characteristics of AIS patients were documented. Candidate SNPs were selected from previous GWAS studies of AIS, which were known to be associated with curve progression and validated across diverse populations. Genotype and allele frequencies between the success and failure groups were compared using χ 2 analysis.
Results: A total of 259 female AIS patients were included in this study, 30.5% of the well-braced patients had curve progression exceeding 5° and 69.5% of the patients undergo an improvement or progression of <5°. Allele C of rs10738445 ( BNC2 ) could significantly add to the risk of bracing failure, with odds ratio of 1.59. No significant association with bracing outcomes was found for rs12946942 ( SOX9/KCNJ2 ), rs1978060 ( TBX1 ), rs1017861 ( CHD7 ), and rs35333564 ( MIR4300HG ).
Conclusions: SNP rs10738445 were significantly associated with brace treatment effectiveness. The other four SNPs were not significantly associated with the outcome of bracing. More SNPs and predictors should be included in future study to develop a more accurate predictive model for clinical application.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.