新辅助化放疗后的食管癌患者是否需要术后辅助放疗?基于 SEER 数据库的分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Qiuying An, Yuhao Su, Yajing Wang, Chanjun Zhen, Wenwen Bai, Liyuan Fu, Yibing Liu, Ping Zhang, Zhiguo Zhou
{"title":"新辅助化放疗后的食管癌患者是否需要术后辅助放疗?基于 SEER 数据库的分析。","authors":"Qiuying An, Yuhao Su, Yajing Wang, Chanjun Zhen, Wenwen Bai, Liyuan Fu, Yibing Liu, Ping Zhang, Zhiguo Zhou","doi":"10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, <i>p</i>=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, <i>p</i>=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50 mm (<i>p</i><0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, <i>p</i>=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, <i>p</i>=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.\",\"authors\":\"Qiuying An, Yuhao Su, Yajing Wang, Chanjun Zhen, Wenwen Bai, Liyuan Fu, Yibing Liu, Ping Zhang, Zhiguo Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, <i>p</i>=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, <i>p</i>=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50 mm (<i>p</i><0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, <i>p</i>=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, <i>p</i>=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估新辅助化放疗(NCRT)后接受食管切除术的食管癌(EC)患者的辅助放疗效果:从SEER数据库中检索了2004年至2019年期间接受新辅助化放疗后辅助治疗的食管癌患者的数据。患者被分为辅助放疗加或不加化疗(RT±CT)组和辅助化疗(CT)组。结果:经过倾向得分匹配,各治疗组共招募了 157 名患者。RT±CT组和CT组的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)均无明显差异(中位OS:28个月对CSS:1个月对1个月):28个月对51个月,P=0.063;中位CSS:31个月对:31个月对52个月,P=0.16)。在CT组中,ypI/II或cI/II肿瘤分期、阳性淋巴结比值(LNR)≤0.1、肿瘤大小≥50 mm的患者(P=0.042;5年CSS:67.9%对19.4%,P=0.023)。多变量考克斯回归分析发现,肿瘤组织学分级是OS和CSS的独立预后因素:结论:以放疗为基础的辅助治疗并不能明显改善NCRT后EC患者的预后,尽管它可以为N期降级的cT3-4肿瘤患者带来生存获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

Methods: The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed.

Results: Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, p=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, p=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50 mm (p<0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, p=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, p=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信