FEV1/FVC 在预测慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重中的作用

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"FEV1/FVC 在预测慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重中的作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Whether the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) can be used as a biomarker to predict the risk of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To investigate the predictive role of FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC for AECOPD, we analyzed data from an observational and multicenter cohort study of 2043 patients with COPD in KOREA. Exposures were post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and/or percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred). The outcome was the development of AECOPD during the first year of follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the first year of follow-up, the proportion of patients who developed AECOPD increased as FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred had similar predictive power for AECOPD, with optimal predictive cut-offs of approximately 0.5 for FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and 50 % for FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred. When the participants were classified into groups based on these cut-offs, compared with a high both-lung function group (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC≥0.5 and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred≥50 %), the low-FEV<sub>1</sub> group (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC≥0.5 and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred&lt;50) had a modestly increased risk of severe AECOPD (adjusted odds ratio[aOR] = 3.12; 95 % confidence interval[CI] = 1.59–6.16), while the risk of severe AECOPD was the highest in the low both-lung function group (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred&lt;50 % and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC&lt;0.5) (aOR = 5.16; 95 % CI = 3.34–7.97).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC is a spirometric biomarker predictive of AECOPD. In countries where FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred is not available for their population, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC could be used as a biomarker for assessing the risk of AECOPD. In countries where accurate FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred is available, both FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC could be used to provide additional information to assess the risk of AECOPD.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>This study showed that FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC had similar predictive power for AECOPD compared with percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>. Furthermore, the use of both FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC provides additional information for the risk assessment of AECOPD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of FEV1/FVC in the prediction of acute exacerbation of COPD\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Whether the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) can be used as a biomarker to predict the risk of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To investigate the predictive role of FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC for AECOPD, we analyzed data from an observational and multicenter cohort study of 2043 patients with COPD in KOREA. Exposures were post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and/or percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred). The outcome was the development of AECOPD during the first year of follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the first year of follow-up, the proportion of patients who developed AECOPD increased as FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred had similar predictive power for AECOPD, with optimal predictive cut-offs of approximately 0.5 for FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and 50 % for FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred. When the participants were classified into groups based on these cut-offs, compared with a high both-lung function group (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC≥0.5 and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred≥50 %), the low-FEV<sub>1</sub> group (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC≥0.5 and FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred&lt;50) had a modestly increased risk of severe AECOPD (adjusted odds ratio[aOR] = 3.12; 95 % confidence interval[CI] = 1.59–6.16), while the risk of severe AECOPD was the highest in the low both-lung function group (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred&lt;50 % and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC&lt;0.5) (aOR = 5.16; 95 % CI = 3.34–7.97).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC is a spirometric biomarker predictive of AECOPD. In countries where FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred is not available for their population, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC could be used as a biomarker for assessing the risk of AECOPD. In countries where accurate FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred is available, both FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC could be used to provide additional information to assess the risk of AECOPD.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>This study showed that FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC had similar predictive power for AECOPD compared with percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>. Furthermore, the use of both FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC provides additional information for the risk assessment of AECOPD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1秒内用力呼气量与用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)之比是否可用作预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重风险的生物标志物尚不清楚:为了研究 FEV1/FVC 对 AECOPD 的预测作用,我们分析了一项观察性多中心队列研究的数据,研究对象是韩国的 2043 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。暴露因子为支气管扩张剂后 FEV1/FVC 和/或预测 FEV1 百分比(FEV1%pred)。结果是在随访的第一年内出现 AECOPD:在随访的第一年中,随着 FEV1/FVC 的降低,发生 AECOPD 的患者比例也在增加(P1/FVC 和 FEV1%pred 对 AECOPD 的预测能力相似,FEV1/FVC 的最佳预测临界值约为 0.5,FEV1%pred 的最佳预测临界值约为 50%)。根据这些临界值将参与者分为不同的组别,与高双肺功能组(FEV1/FVC≥0.5 和 FEV1%pred≥50%)相比,低 FEV1 组(FEV1/FVC≥0.5 和 FEV1%pred1%pred1/FVConclusions:FEV1/FVC 是预测 AECOPD 的肺活量生物标志物。在没有 FEV1%pred 的国家,FEV1/FVC 可用作评估 AECOPD 风险的生物标志物。在有准确 FEV1%pred 的国家,FEV1%pred 和 FEV1/FVC 都可用于提供评估 AECOPD 风险的额外信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of FEV1/FVC in the prediction of acute exacerbation of COPD

Background

Whether the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) can be used as a biomarker to predict the risk of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unclear.

Methods

To investigate the predictive role of FEV1/FVC for AECOPD, we analyzed data from an observational and multicenter cohort study of 2043 patients with COPD in KOREA. Exposures were post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC and/or percentage predicted FEV1 (FEV1%pred). The outcome was the development of AECOPD during the first year of follow-up.

Results

During the first year of follow-up, the proportion of patients who developed AECOPD increased as FEV1/FVC decreased (P < 0.01). FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred had similar predictive power for AECOPD, with optimal predictive cut-offs of approximately 0.5 for FEV1/FVC and 50 % for FEV1%pred. When the participants were classified into groups based on these cut-offs, compared with a high both-lung function group (FEV1/FVC≥0.5 and FEV1%pred≥50 %), the low-FEV1 group (FEV1/FVC≥0.5 and FEV1%pred<50) had a modestly increased risk of severe AECOPD (adjusted odds ratio[aOR] = 3.12; 95 % confidence interval[CI] = 1.59–6.16), while the risk of severe AECOPD was the highest in the low both-lung function group (FEV1%pred<50 % and FEV1/FVC<0.5) (aOR = 5.16; 95 % CI = 3.34–7.97).

Conclusions

FEV1/FVC is a spirometric biomarker predictive of AECOPD. In countries where FEV1%pred is not available for their population, FEV1/FVC could be used as a biomarker for assessing the risk of AECOPD. In countries where accurate FEV1%pred is available, both FEV1%pred and FEV1/FVC could be used to provide additional information to assess the risk of AECOPD.

Key message

This study showed that FEV1/FVC had similar predictive power for AECOPD compared with percentage predicted FEV1. Furthermore, the use of both FEV1 and FEV1/FVC provides additional information for the risk assessment of AECOPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信