{"title":"从不同的 18F-FDG PET/CT 研究方案中估算患者的剂量并分析优化策略。","authors":"Pooja Dwivedi, Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Viraj Sawant, Vishal Vajarkar, Manoj Chauhan, Sayak Choudhury, Venkatesh Rangarajan","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncae179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the dose in different protocols of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) procedure. The retrospective study involves 207 patients with confirmed malignancies who underwent PET/CT. Effective dose (E) from PET was estimated based on injected activity and dose coefficient as per International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) 128. Estimation of E from CT was done utilizing the dose length product (DLP) method and conversion factors as per ICRP 102. There was a significant statistical difference observed in E between different PET/CT protocols (P < .001). E of PET in the whole body (WB) was found to be 4.9 ± 0.9 mSv, whereas mean volume computed tomography dose indexvol, DLP, and E of CT in WB were 7.0 ± 0.2 mGy, 674.3 ± 80.7 mGy.cm, and 10.1 ± 1.2 mSv, respectively. No linear correlation was seen between the size-specific dose estimate and E of CT (r = -0.003; P = .978). The total mean E in WB PET/CT was 17.0 ± 1.7 mSv. CT dose was contributing more than PET dose in all protocols except brain PET/CT. Optimization strategies can be evaluated only if monitored periodically.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose estimation in patients from different protocols of 18F-FDG PET/CT studies and analysis of optimization strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Dwivedi, Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Viraj Sawant, Vishal Vajarkar, Manoj Chauhan, Sayak Choudhury, Venkatesh Rangarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpd/ncae179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the dose in different protocols of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) procedure. The retrospective study involves 207 patients with confirmed malignancies who underwent PET/CT. Effective dose (E) from PET was estimated based on injected activity and dose coefficient as per International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) 128. Estimation of E from CT was done utilizing the dose length product (DLP) method and conversion factors as per ICRP 102. There was a significant statistical difference observed in E between different PET/CT protocols (P < .001). E of PET in the whole body (WB) was found to be 4.9 ± 0.9 mSv, whereas mean volume computed tomography dose indexvol, DLP, and E of CT in WB were 7.0 ± 0.2 mGy, 674.3 ± 80.7 mGy.cm, and 10.1 ± 1.2 mSv, respectively. No linear correlation was seen between the size-specific dose estimate and E of CT (r = -0.003; P = .978). The total mean E in WB PET/CT was 17.0 ± 1.7 mSv. CT dose was contributing more than PET dose in all protocols except brain PET/CT. Optimization strategies can be evaluated only if monitored periodically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dose estimation in patients from different protocols of 18F-FDG PET/CT studies and analysis of optimization strategies.
This study aimed to evaluate the dose in different protocols of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) procedure. The retrospective study involves 207 patients with confirmed malignancies who underwent PET/CT. Effective dose (E) from PET was estimated based on injected activity and dose coefficient as per International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) 128. Estimation of E from CT was done utilizing the dose length product (DLP) method and conversion factors as per ICRP 102. There was a significant statistical difference observed in E between different PET/CT protocols (P < .001). E of PET in the whole body (WB) was found to be 4.9 ± 0.9 mSv, whereas mean volume computed tomography dose indexvol, DLP, and E of CT in WB were 7.0 ± 0.2 mGy, 674.3 ± 80.7 mGy.cm, and 10.1 ± 1.2 mSv, respectively. No linear correlation was seen between the size-specific dose estimate and E of CT (r = -0.003; P = .978). The total mean E in WB PET/CT was 17.0 ± 1.7 mSv. CT dose was contributing more than PET dose in all protocols except brain PET/CT. Optimization strategies can be evaluated only if monitored periodically.
期刊介绍：
Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
