抗氨基酸转移核糖核酸合成酶抗体患者肌肉磁共振成像与肌肉组织病理结果的对比。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hiroshi Takei, Yasushi Kondo, Satoshi Takanashi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Shiro Matsubara, Yuko Kaneko
{"title":"抗氨基酸转移核糖核酸合成酶抗体患者肌肉磁共振成像与肌肉组织病理结果的对比。","authors":"Hiroshi Takei, Yasushi Kondo, Satoshi Takanashi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Shiro Matsubara, Yuko Kaneko","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings reflect the pathological features of inflammatory myopathies: </strong>Methods: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) diagnosed using the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in our university between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. IIMs were subclassified into the anti-ARS syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), Dermatomyositis DM and others. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI and muscle biopsy specimens were assessed in IIMs followed by the comparison among the four subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI findings were available for 62 patients and histopathological findings were available for 27 patients. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in the muscle tissues from the patients with IIM was more frequently observed in patients with subcutaneous and fascial high signal intensity (HSI) on MRI than those without. Four-group comparison among ASSD, IMNM, DM and others revealed HSI in fasciae on MRI was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD and DM than others. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in muscle tissues was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD than in others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ASSD had distinct MRI features compared with anti-ARS negative patients. The fascial high signal intensity on MRI may reflect distinctive pathological features of muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast of muscle magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings of muscle tissue in patients with anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Takei, Yasushi Kondo, Satoshi Takanashi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Shiro Matsubara, Yuko Kaneko\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roae070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings reflect the pathological features of inflammatory myopathies: </strong>Methods: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) diagnosed using the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in our university between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. IIMs were subclassified into the anti-ARS syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), Dermatomyositis DM and others. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI and muscle biopsy specimens were assessed in IIMs followed by the comparison among the four subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI findings were available for 62 patients and histopathological findings were available for 27 patients. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in the muscle tissues from the patients with IIM was more frequently observed in patients with subcutaneous and fascial high signal intensity (HSI) on MRI than those without. Four-group comparison among ASSD, IMNM, DM and others revealed HSI in fasciae on MRI was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD and DM than others. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in muscle tissues was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD than in others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ASSD had distinct MRI features compared with anti-ARS negative patients. The fascial high signal intensity on MRI may reflect distinctive pathological features of muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定磁共振成像(mri)结果是否反映了炎症性肌病的病理特征:方法:对我校 2005 年至 2020 年间采用 2017 年 EULAR/ACR 分类标准确诊的特发性炎症性肌病(IIMs)患者进行回顾性研究。IIMs被细分为抗ARS综合征(ASSD)、免疫介导的坏死性肌炎(IMNM)、皮肌炎DM及其他。对 IIMs 的脂肪抑制 T2 加权磁共振成像和肌肉活检标本进行评估,然后对四个亚组进行比较:结果:62 名患者获得了核磁共振成像结果,27 名患者获得了组织病理学结果。在 IIM 患者的肌肉组织中,MRI 上有皮下和筋膜高信号强度(HSI)的患者比没有高信号强度(HSI)的患者更常观察到筋膜周围萎缩或坏死。ASSD、IMNM、DM 和其他患者的四组比较显示,在 MRI 上观察到筋膜高信号强度的 ASSD 和 DM 患者多于其他患者。与其他患者相比,ASSD 患者更常观察到筋膜周围肌肉组织萎缩或坏死:结论:与抗ARS阴性患者相比,ASSD患者具有明显的磁共振特征。磁共振成像上的筋膜高信号强度可能反映了肌肉的独特病理特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast of muscle magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings of muscle tissue in patients with anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies.

Objectives: to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings reflect the pathological features of inflammatory myopathies: Methods: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) diagnosed using the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in our university between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. IIMs were subclassified into the anti-ARS syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), Dermatomyositis DM and others. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI and muscle biopsy specimens were assessed in IIMs followed by the comparison among the four subgroups.

Results: MRI findings were available for 62 patients and histopathological findings were available for 27 patients. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in the muscle tissues from the patients with IIM was more frequently observed in patients with subcutaneous and fascial high signal intensity (HSI) on MRI than those without. Four-group comparison among ASSD, IMNM, DM and others revealed HSI in fasciae on MRI was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD and DM than others. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in muscle tissues was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD than in others.

Conclusion: Patients with ASSD had distinct MRI features compared with anti-ARS negative patients. The fascial high signal intensity on MRI may reflect distinctive pathological features of muscles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信