久坐行为肌电图:识别降低心脏代谢风险的潜力。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Suvi Lamberg, Christian J Brakenridge, David W Dunstan, Taija Finni, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, Arto J Pesola
{"title":"久坐行为肌电图:识别降低心脏代谢风险的潜力。","authors":"Suvi Lamberg, Christian J Brakenridge, David W Dunstan, Taija Finni, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, Arto J Pesola","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Muscle activation during interruptions to prolonged sedentary time is a hypothesized mechanism underlying observed cardiometabolic benefits. We examined associations of quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity patterns with cardiometabolic risk markers and how these patterns varied between different sitting-interruption countermeasures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electromyographic (EMG) data (shorts) were gathered for 1 to 2 days from healthy adults in a free-living study (n = 172, age 40.9 ± 12.9, BMI 23.6 ± 1.3) and a laboratory-based study (n = 12, age 47.0 ± 7.7, BMI 30.0 ± 4.7). Patterns examined were average EMG (aEMG ;%EMGMVC); EMG activity duration (% above signal baseline 3 μV); and usual (weighted medians) EMG activity bout amplitude (%EMGMVC) and duration (s). In the free-living study, these were regressed against risk markers (waist; fat percentage; fasting plasma glucose [FPG];total cholesterol; HDL;LDL; triglycerides); in the laboratory study, EMG patterns for the muscle groups were compared between sitting and the active countermeasures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the free-living study, lower extremity muscles displayed minimal overall activity, with hamstrings and quadriceps using only 2.6% and 2.0% of their capacity (%EMGMVC), respectively, and being active for 30% and 25% of the time. Higher hamstring aEMG and EMG activity duration were beneficially associated with waist, HDL and fat percentage (duration only) and a longer quadriceps usual EMG activity bout duration was beneficially associated with FPG. In the laboratory study, compared with prolonged sitting, active seated or upright active-interruption countermeasures modified these EMG patterns; brief (6 min) walking and simple resistance activities (SRA) were more beneficial than was a bout of standing (30 min) with the SRAs being the only intervention that matched daily aEMG levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upright and physically active interruptions to sitting appear to be required to increase the typically low muscle engagement observed in free-living contexts, promoting muscle activity patterns that may help ameliorate cardiometabolic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electromyography of Sedentary Behavior: Identifying Potential for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Suvi Lamberg, Christian J Brakenridge, David W Dunstan, Taija Finni, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, Arto J Pesola\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Muscle activation during interruptions to prolonged sedentary time is a hypothesized mechanism underlying observed cardiometabolic benefits. We examined associations of quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity patterns with cardiometabolic risk markers and how these patterns varied between different sitting-interruption countermeasures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electromyographic (EMG) data (shorts) were gathered for 1 to 2 days from healthy adults in a free-living study (n = 172, age 40.9 ± 12.9, BMI 23.6 ± 1.3) and a laboratory-based study (n = 12, age 47.0 ± 7.7, BMI 30.0 ± 4.7). Patterns examined were average EMG (aEMG ;%EMGMVC); EMG activity duration (% above signal baseline 3 μV); and usual (weighted medians) EMG activity bout amplitude (%EMGMVC) and duration (s). In the free-living study, these were regressed against risk markers (waist; fat percentage; fasting plasma glucose [FPG];total cholesterol; HDL;LDL; triglycerides); in the laboratory study, EMG patterns for the muscle groups were compared between sitting and the active countermeasures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the free-living study, lower extremity muscles displayed minimal overall activity, with hamstrings and quadriceps using only 2.6% and 2.0% of their capacity (%EMGMVC), respectively, and being active for 30% and 25% of the time. Higher hamstring aEMG and EMG activity duration were beneficially associated with waist, HDL and fat percentage (duration only) and a longer quadriceps usual EMG activity bout duration was beneficially associated with FPG. In the laboratory study, compared with prolonged sitting, active seated or upright active-interruption countermeasures modified these EMG patterns; brief (6 min) walking and simple resistance activities (SRA) were more beneficial than was a bout of standing (30 min) with the SRAs being the only intervention that matched daily aEMG levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upright and physically active interruptions to sitting appear to be required to increase the typically low muscle engagement observed in free-living contexts, promoting muscle activity patterns that may help ameliorate cardiometabolic risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003544\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:中断长时间久坐时的肌肉激活是一种假设机制,是已观察到的心脏代谢益处的基础。我们研究了股四头肌和腿筋肌肉活动模式与心脏代谢风险指标之间的关联,以及这些模式在不同的久坐中断对策之间的差异:在一项自由生活研究(n = 172,年龄 40.9 ± 12.9,体重指数 23.6 ± 1.3)和一项实验室研究(n = 12,年龄 47.0 ± 7.7,体重指数 30.0 ± 4.7)中,收集了健康成年人 1 到 2 天的肌电图(EMG)数据(短裤)。研究的模式包括:EMG 平均值(aEMG ;%EMGMVC);EMG 活动持续时间(高于信号基线 3 μV 的百分比);以及通常(加权中值)EMG 活动阵列振幅(%EMGMVC)和持续时间(秒)。在自由生活研究中,这些指标与风险指标(腰围、脂肪百分比、空腹血浆葡萄糖[FPG]、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、甘油三酯)进行了回归分析;在实验室研究中,对坐姿和活动对策的肌群肌电图模式进行了比较:在自由活动研究中,下肢肌肉的整体活动量极小,腘绳肌和股四头肌分别只使用了其能力(%EMGMVC)的 2.6% 和 2.0%,活动时间分别为 30% 和 25%。较高的腿肌肌电图和肌电图活动持续时间与腰围、高密度脂蛋白和脂肪百分比(仅持续时间)有益相关,而较长的股四头肌通常肌电图活动时间则与FPG有益相关。在实验室研究中,与久坐相比,积极的坐姿或直立的主动中断对策改变了这些肌电图模式;短暂(6 分钟)的步行和简单的阻力活动(SRA)比站立(30 分钟)更有益,SRA 是唯一与日常肌电图水平相匹配的干预措施:结论:在自由生活的情况下,似乎需要直立和体力活动来中断坐姿,以增加通常较低的肌肉参与度,促进肌肉活动模式,从而有助于降低心脏代谢风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electromyography of Sedentary Behavior: Identifying Potential for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction.

Introduction: Muscle activation during interruptions to prolonged sedentary time is a hypothesized mechanism underlying observed cardiometabolic benefits. We examined associations of quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity patterns with cardiometabolic risk markers and how these patterns varied between different sitting-interruption countermeasures.

Methods: Electromyographic (EMG) data (shorts) were gathered for 1 to 2 days from healthy adults in a free-living study (n = 172, age 40.9 ± 12.9, BMI 23.6 ± 1.3) and a laboratory-based study (n = 12, age 47.0 ± 7.7, BMI 30.0 ± 4.7). Patterns examined were average EMG (aEMG ;%EMGMVC); EMG activity duration (% above signal baseline 3 μV); and usual (weighted medians) EMG activity bout amplitude (%EMGMVC) and duration (s). In the free-living study, these were regressed against risk markers (waist; fat percentage; fasting plasma glucose [FPG];total cholesterol; HDL;LDL; triglycerides); in the laboratory study, EMG patterns for the muscle groups were compared between sitting and the active countermeasures.

Results: In the free-living study, lower extremity muscles displayed minimal overall activity, with hamstrings and quadriceps using only 2.6% and 2.0% of their capacity (%EMGMVC), respectively, and being active for 30% and 25% of the time. Higher hamstring aEMG and EMG activity duration were beneficially associated with waist, HDL and fat percentage (duration only) and a longer quadriceps usual EMG activity bout duration was beneficially associated with FPG. In the laboratory study, compared with prolonged sitting, active seated or upright active-interruption countermeasures modified these EMG patterns; brief (6 min) walking and simple resistance activities (SRA) were more beneficial than was a bout of standing (30 min) with the SRAs being the only intervention that matched daily aEMG levels.

Conclusions: Upright and physically active interruptions to sitting appear to be required to increase the typically low muscle engagement observed in free-living contexts, promoting muscle activity patterns that may help ameliorate cardiometabolic risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信