产后出血患者仅结扎子宫动脉和仅结扎胃下动脉后的妊娠结局和生育能力。

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Betül Tokgöz Çakır, Çağatayhan Öztürk, Gizem Aktemur, Gülşan Karabay, Zeynep Şeyhanlı, Sadun Sucu, Mevlüt Bucak, Burak Bayraktar, Can Ozan Ulusoy, Erkan Sağlam, Caner Çakır, Can Tekin İskender, Yaprak Engin-Üstün
{"title":"产后出血患者仅结扎子宫动脉和仅结扎胃下动脉后的妊娠结局和生育能力。","authors":"Betül Tokgöz Çakır, Çağatayhan Öztürk, Gizem Aktemur, Gülşan Karabay, Zeynep Şeyhanlı, Sadun Sucu, Mevlüt Bucak, Burak Bayraktar, Can Ozan Ulusoy, Erkan Sağlam, Caner Çakır, Can Tekin İskender, Yaprak Engin-Üstün","doi":"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-10-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine and compare pregnancy outcomes after bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) or bilateral hypogastric artery ligation (BHAL) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients who had undergone arterial ligation for PPH were included in the study. Patients who had undergone BUAL and BHAL were compared with a control group in terms of fertility and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were included, of whom 47 underwent BUAl, 59 underwent BHAL and 50 were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in subsequent pregnancies in terms of the incidence of miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, primary cesarean deliveries, and infertility (p>0.05). There was a significant difference between all groups in gestational age at birth and birthweight. Preterm birth was observed in 32.2% of patients in the BHAL group, and this rate was significantly higher than in the BUAL (12.8%) and control (6%) groups (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPH is a life-threatening obstetric problem. The effects of interventions performed to reduce pelvic blood flow in patients may lead to persistent problems, such as preterm birth and low birth weight in the next pregnancy. However, these interventions do not appear to affect the risk of miscarriage. In subsequent pregnancies of patients who received BHAL, special attention should be paid to preterm birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":17440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy outcomes and fertility after ligation of uterine artery only and hypogastric artery only in postpartum hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Betül Tokgöz Çakır, Çağatayhan Öztürk, Gizem Aktemur, Gülşan Karabay, Zeynep Şeyhanlı, Sadun Sucu, Mevlüt Bucak, Burak Bayraktar, Can Ozan Ulusoy, Erkan Sağlam, Caner Çakır, Can Tekin İskender, Yaprak Engin-Üstün\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-10-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine and compare pregnancy outcomes after bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) or bilateral hypogastric artery ligation (BHAL) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients who had undergone arterial ligation for PPH were included in the study. Patients who had undergone BUAL and BHAL were compared with a control group in terms of fertility and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were included, of whom 47 underwent BUAl, 59 underwent BHAL and 50 were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in subsequent pregnancies in terms of the incidence of miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, primary cesarean deliveries, and infertility (p>0.05). There was a significant difference between all groups in gestational age at birth and birthweight. Preterm birth was observed in 32.2% of patients in the BHAL group, and this rate was significantly higher than in the BUAL (12.8%) and control (6%) groups (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPH is a life-threatening obstetric problem. The effects of interventions performed to reduce pelvic blood flow in patients may lead to persistent problems, such as preterm birth and low birth weight in the next pregnancy. However, these interventions do not appear to affect the risk of miscarriage. In subsequent pregnancies of patients who received BHAL, special attention should be paid to preterm birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-10-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-10-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定并比较双侧子宫动脉结扎术(BUAL)或双侧胃下动脉结扎术(BHAL)治疗产后出血(PPH)后的妊娠结局:这项回顾性横断面研究于2010年1月至2018年6月在一家三级转诊医院进行。研究纳入了因 PPH 而接受动脉结扎手术的患者。将接受 BUAL 和 BHAL 的患者与对照组的生育和妊娠结局进行比较:共纳入 156 例患者,其中 47 例接受了 BUAl,59 例接受了 BHAL,50 例为对照组。在流产、胎儿生长受限、子痫前期、原发性剖宫产和不孕症的发生率方面,各组间的妊娠结局无明显差异(P>0.05)。各组间的出生胎龄和出生体重存在明显差异。BHAL组有32.2%的患者出现早产,这一比例明显高于BUAL组(12.8%)和对照组(6%)(P=0.001):PPH是一个威胁生命的产科问题。结论:PPH 是一种危及生命的产科问题,为减少患者骨盆血流量而采取的干预措施可能会导致持续性问题,如早产和下一次怀孕时出生体重过轻。不过,这些干预措施似乎不会影响流产的风险。接受过 BHAL 治疗的患者在下次怀孕时应特别注意早产问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnancy outcomes and fertility after ligation of uterine artery only and hypogastric artery only in postpartum hemorrhage.

Objective: To determine and compare pregnancy outcomes after bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) or bilateral hypogastric artery ligation (BHAL) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Material and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients who had undergone arterial ligation for PPH were included in the study. Patients who had undergone BUAL and BHAL were compared with a control group in terms of fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

Results: A total of 156 patients were included, of whom 47 underwent BUAl, 59 underwent BHAL and 50 were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in subsequent pregnancies in terms of the incidence of miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, primary cesarean deliveries, and infertility (p>0.05). There was a significant difference between all groups in gestational age at birth and birthweight. Preterm birth was observed in 32.2% of patients in the BHAL group, and this rate was significantly higher than in the BUAL (12.8%) and control (6%) groups (p=0.001).

Conclusion: PPH is a life-threatening obstetric problem. The effects of interventions performed to reduce pelvic blood flow in patients may lead to persistent problems, such as preterm birth and low birth weight in the next pregnancy. However, these interventions do not appear to affect the risk of miscarriage. In subsequent pregnancies of patients who received BHAL, special attention should be paid to preterm birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is the official, open access publication of the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation and Turkish-German Gynecological Association and is published quarterly on March, June, September and December. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English language. Manuscripts are reviewed in accordance with “double-blind peer review” process for both reviewers and authors. The target audience of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association includes gynecologists and primary care physicians interested in gynecology practice. It publishes original works on all aspects of obstertrics and gynecology. The aim of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is to publish high quality original research articles. In addition to research articles, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, diagnostic puzzle are also published. Suggestions for new books are also welcomed. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association does not charge any fee for article submission or processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信