{"title":"慢性病负担与抑郁症治疗中的种族-民族差异之间的关系》（The Relationship of Chronic Disease Burden and Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Depression Treatment.","authors":"Juliette V Hernandez, Jeffrey S Harman","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02081-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic disease and depression are closely related, and depression, if left untreated, can worsen physical disease symptoms. Furthermore, treating depression can improve patient outcomes. Generally, treatment for depression is lower in minority groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between chronic disease burden and depression treatment and whether that relationship differs between white to non-white patient visits to primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a quantitative secondary data analysis using data from 2014-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Visits by adults with depression to primary care physicians (n = 3832).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Logistic regressions estimated the odds of medication treatment, mental health counseling treatment, and any treatment.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Visits by patients with 3 or more chronic conditions had 1.39 times the odds of receiving medication treatment (p-value = 0.06). However, when examining treatment by race, visits by white patients with 1-2 chronic conditions had 3.04 times the odds of receiving mental health treatment (p-value = 0.09) compared to visits by non-white patients and 2.09 times the odds of receiving any treatment (p-value = 0.08) compared to visits by non-white patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not significant at the p < .05 level, the results suggest that the odds of depression treatment is greater during visits by patients with multiple co-occurring chronic conditions compared to visits by people without chronic conditions. It appears that this effect is larger for visits by white patients compared to visits by non-white patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine how this association impacts minorities distinctly and what could be the reason behind the disparity. These findings could help physicians be aware of ongoing disparities in depression treatment and provide more equitable depression treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship of Chronic Disease Burden and Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Depression Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Juliette V Hernandez, Jeffrey S Harman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02081-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic disease and depression are closely related, and depression, if left untreated, can worsen physical disease symptoms. Furthermore, treating depression can improve patient outcomes. Generally, treatment for depression is lower in minority groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between chronic disease burden and depression treatment and whether that relationship differs between white to non-white patient visits to primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a quantitative secondary data analysis using data from 2014-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Visits by adults with depression to primary care physicians (n = 3832).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Logistic regressions estimated the odds of medication treatment, mental health counseling treatment, and any treatment.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Visits by patients with 3 or more chronic conditions had 1.39 times the odds of receiving medication treatment (p-value = 0.06). However, when examining treatment by race, visits by white patients with 1-2 chronic conditions had 3.04 times the odds of receiving mental health treatment (p-value = 0.09) compared to visits by non-white patients and 2.09 times the odds of receiving any treatment (p-value = 0.08) compared to visits by non-white patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not significant at the p < .05 level, the results suggest that the odds of depression treatment is greater during visits by patients with multiple co-occurring chronic conditions compared to visits by people without chronic conditions. It appears that this effect is larger for visits by white patients compared to visits by non-white patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine how this association impacts minorities distinctly and what could be the reason behind the disparity. These findings could help physicians be aware of ongoing disparities in depression treatment and provide more equitable depression treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02081-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02081-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationship of Chronic Disease Burden and Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Depression Treatment.
Background: Chronic disease and depression are closely related, and depression, if left untreated, can worsen physical disease symptoms. Furthermore, treating depression can improve patient outcomes. Generally, treatment for depression is lower in minority groups.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between chronic disease burden and depression treatment and whether that relationship differs between white to non-white patient visits to primary care physicians.
Design: We conducted a quantitative secondary data analysis using data from 2014-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).
Participants: Visits by adults with depression to primary care physicians (n = 3832).
Main measures: Logistic regressions estimated the odds of medication treatment, mental health counseling treatment, and any treatment.
Key results: Visits by patients with 3 or more chronic conditions had 1.39 times the odds of receiving medication treatment (p-value = 0.06). However, when examining treatment by race, visits by white patients with 1-2 chronic conditions had 3.04 times the odds of receiving mental health treatment (p-value = 0.09) compared to visits by non-white patients and 2.09 times the odds of receiving any treatment (p-value = 0.08) compared to visits by non-white patients.
Conclusions: Although not significant at the p < .05 level, the results suggest that the odds of depression treatment is greater during visits by patients with multiple co-occurring chronic conditions compared to visits by people without chronic conditions. It appears that this effect is larger for visits by white patients compared to visits by non-white patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine how this association impacts minorities distinctly and what could be the reason behind the disparity. These findings could help physicians be aware of ongoing disparities in depression treatment and provide more equitable depression treatment.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
