Both Type I Bovine Collagen Conduits and Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa Conduits Result in Functional Sensory Recovery Following Peripheral Nerve Microsurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The study purpose was to measure and compare the time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) and incidence of FSR by 6 and 12 months between type I bovine collagen conduits versus porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) conduits with primary neurorrhaphy for peripheral nerve injury repair.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. The predictor variable was the type of conduit—either bovine collagen or porcine SIS. The primary outcome variable was the number of months between surgery and the patient achieving FSR. The secondary outcome variable was the proportion of patients who achieved FSR that did so by 6 and 12 months. A log-rank test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences observed in the overall time-to-FSR data and by 6 and 12 months.

Results

We screened 67 publications of which 8 were included. The sample sizes were 137 and 96 patients for the bovine collagen and porcine SIS groups, respectively. The median time to FSR for the bovine collagen conduit group was 9 months (interquartile range: 6); the median time to FSR for the porcine SIS conduit group 6 months (interquartile range: 3 months) (P = .50). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 42% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 64% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 6 months (P < .01). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 94% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 82% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 12 months (P < .01).

Conclusion

Although a significant difference was found in the incidence of FSR at 6 and 12 months, no significant difference was found in overall time to FSR, supporting the use of either conduit for peripheral nerve repair.