在第三磨牙拔除过程中使用不同的意识镇静剂来控制牙科焦虑症:临床证据和技术现状。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Alessio Rosa, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Luca Fiorillo, Claudio Arcuri
{"title":"在第三磨牙拔除过程中使用不同的意识镇静剂来控制牙科焦虑症:临床证据和技术现状。","authors":"Alessio Rosa, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Luca Fiorillo, Claudio Arcuri","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental anxiety, linked to avoiding dental treatment and heightened medical and surgical risks, prompted this systematic review. The objective is to synthesize existing evidence on conscious sedation techniques employed for managing dental anxiety in patients scheduled for third molar extraction surgery, aiming to identify optimal approaches and address knowledge gaps. This systematic review followed the \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\" checklist and the population, investigation, comparation, outcome framework. The protocol still needs to be registered. A thorough search was conducted, incorporating MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until February 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were considered, following \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\" guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 2081 patients were included. Certain factors limited the feasibility of a meaningful meta-analysis, leading to a narrative synthesis. Conscious sedation with virtual reality showed an association with improved dental anxiety in 4 studies. One study reported reduced cortisol levels with midazolam compared with a placebo, whereas another noted significant variations in perioperative renin levels with remifentanil versus placebo. This review reveals inconclusive and conflicting findings regarding the role of conscious sedation in managing dental anxiety during third molar extraction surgery. Persistent uncertainties arise due to a need for consistent, standardized outcome measures. Addressing these limitations in study design is crucial for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Uses of Conscious Sedation for Managing Dental Anxiety During Third-Molar Extraction: Clinical Evidence and State of the Art.\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Rosa, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Luca Fiorillo, Claudio Arcuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dental anxiety, linked to avoiding dental treatment and heightened medical and surgical risks, prompted this systematic review. The objective is to synthesize existing evidence on conscious sedation techniques employed for managing dental anxiety in patients scheduled for third molar extraction surgery, aiming to identify optimal approaches and address knowledge gaps. This systematic review followed the \\\"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\\\" checklist and the population, investigation, comparation, outcome framework. The protocol still needs to be registered. A thorough search was conducted, incorporating MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until February 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were considered, following \\\"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\\\" guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 2081 patients were included. Certain factors limited the feasibility of a meaningful meta-analysis, leading to a narrative synthesis. Conscious sedation with virtual reality showed an association with improved dental anxiety in 4 studies. One study reported reduced cortisol levels with midazolam compared with a placebo, whereas another noted significant variations in perioperative renin levels with remifentanil versus placebo. This review reveals inconclusive and conflicting findings regarding the role of conscious sedation in managing dental anxiety during third molar extraction surgery. Persistent uncertainties arise due to a need for consistent, standardized outcome measures. Addressing these limitations in study design is crucial for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙科焦虑与避免牙科治疗以及医疗和手术风险的增加有关,因此促使我们进行了这项系统性综述。本综述旨在综合现有的证据,说明有意识镇静技术可用于控制计划接受第三磨牙拔除手术患者的牙科焦虑,从而找出最佳方法并填补知识空白。本系统性综述遵循了 "系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目 "清单和人群、调查、比较、结果框架。协议仍需注册。在 2024 年 2 月之前,对 MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE、SCOPUS、clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane 系统综述数据库进行了全面检索。根据 "系统综述和元分析首选报告项目 "指南,只考虑随机对照试验。偏倚风险按照《科克伦干预措施系统综述手册》进行评估。共纳入了 18 项随机对照试验,涉及 2081 名患者。某些因素限制了进行有意义的荟萃分析的可行性,因此只能进行叙述性综合分析。在 4 项研究中,使用虚拟现实技术的意识镇静与牙科焦虑症的改善有关。一项研究报告称,与安慰剂相比,咪达唑仑可降低皮质醇水平,而另一项研究则指出,与安慰剂相比,瑞芬太尼可显著改变围手术期的肾素水平。本综述揭示了在第三磨牙拔除手术中意识镇静在控制牙科焦虑方面的作用,但研究结果并不确定且相互矛盾。由于需要统一、标准化的结果测量方法,因此不确定性一直存在。解决研究设计中的这些局限性对于未来的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Uses of Conscious Sedation for Managing Dental Anxiety During Third-Molar Extraction: Clinical Evidence and State of the Art.

Dental anxiety, linked to avoiding dental treatment and heightened medical and surgical risks, prompted this systematic review. The objective is to synthesize existing evidence on conscious sedation techniques employed for managing dental anxiety in patients scheduled for third molar extraction surgery, aiming to identify optimal approaches and address knowledge gaps. This systematic review followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" checklist and the population, investigation, comparation, outcome framework. The protocol still needs to be registered. A thorough search was conducted, incorporating MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until February 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were considered, following "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 2081 patients were included. Certain factors limited the feasibility of a meaningful meta-analysis, leading to a narrative synthesis. Conscious sedation with virtual reality showed an association with improved dental anxiety in 4 studies. One study reported reduced cortisol levels with midazolam compared with a placebo, whereas another noted significant variations in perioperative renin levels with remifentanil versus placebo. This review reveals inconclusive and conflicting findings regarding the role of conscious sedation in managing dental anxiety during third molar extraction surgery. Persistent uncertainties arise due to a need for consistent, standardized outcome measures. Addressing these limitations in study design is crucial for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信