探索人类基因组景观:一个大型中东队列中的常见同源性区域模式。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Lena Sagi-Dain, Michal Levy, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Idit Maya
{"title":"探索人类基因组景观:一个大型中东队列中的常见同源性区域模式。","authors":"Lena Sagi-Dain, Michal Levy, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Idit Maya","doi":"10.1093/hmg/ddae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regions of Homozygosity (ROH) typically reflect normal demographic history of a human population, but may also relate to cryptic consanguinity, and, additionally, have been associated with specific medical conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the location, size, and prevalence of common ROH segments in a Middle Eastern cohort. This retrospective study included 13 483 samples collected from all Chromosomal Microarray analyses (CMA) performed using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays at the genetic clinical laboratory of Rabin Medical Center between 2017-2023 (primary data set). An additional replication cohort including 100 842 samples from another SNP array platform, obtained from Maccabi Health Organization, was analyzed. Common ROH locations were defined as those ROH locations involving 1% or more of the samples. A total of 66 710 ROH segments, involving 13 035 samples (96.7%) were identified in the primary data set. Of the 4069 cytogenetic ROH locations, 68 were identified as common. The prevalence of non-common ROH was relatively high in affected individuals, and for acrocentric chromosomes, chromosomes associated with common trisomies, and non-imprinted chromosomes. In addition, differences in common ROH locations were observed between the primary and the replication cohorts. Our findings highlight the need for population-specific guidelines in determining ROH reporting cutoffs, considering factors such as population-specific prevalence and testing platform differences. Future research with larger, varied cohorts is essential to advance understanding of ROH's associations with medical conditions and to improve clinical practices accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the human genomic landscape: patterns of common homozygosity regions in a large middle eastern cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Sagi-Dain, Michal Levy, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Idit Maya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hmg/ddae123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regions of Homozygosity (ROH) typically reflect normal demographic history of a human population, but may also relate to cryptic consanguinity, and, additionally, have been associated with specific medical conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the location, size, and prevalence of common ROH segments in a Middle Eastern cohort. This retrospective study included 13 483 samples collected from all Chromosomal Microarray analyses (CMA) performed using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays at the genetic clinical laboratory of Rabin Medical Center between 2017-2023 (primary data set). An additional replication cohort including 100 842 samples from another SNP array platform, obtained from Maccabi Health Organization, was analyzed. Common ROH locations were defined as those ROH locations involving 1% or more of the samples. A total of 66 710 ROH segments, involving 13 035 samples (96.7%) were identified in the primary data set. Of the 4069 cytogenetic ROH locations, 68 were identified as common. The prevalence of non-common ROH was relatively high in affected individuals, and for acrocentric chromosomes, chromosomes associated with common trisomies, and non-imprinted chromosomes. In addition, differences in common ROH locations were observed between the primary and the replication cohorts. Our findings highlight the need for population-specific guidelines in determining ROH reporting cutoffs, considering factors such as population-specific prevalence and testing platform differences. Future research with larger, varied cohorts is essential to advance understanding of ROH's associations with medical conditions and to improve clinical practices accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddae123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddae123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同源性区域(ROH)通常反映了人类人口的正常人口史,但也可能与隐性近亲关系有关,此外,还与特定的医疗条件有关。本研究的目的是调查中东人群中常见 ROH 区段的位置、大小和患病率。这项回顾性研究包括从拉宾医学中心遗传临床实验室 2017-2023 年间使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列进行的所有染色体微阵列分析(CMA)中收集的 13 483 份样本(主要数据集)。另外还分析了一个复制队列,其中包括来自另一个SNP阵列平台的100 842个样本,这些样本来自马卡比卫生组织(Maccabi Health Organization)。常见的ROH位置被定义为涉及1%或更多样本的ROH位置。在原始数据集中共鉴定出 66 710 个 ROH 区段,涉及 13 035 个样本(96.7%)。在 4069 个细胞遗传学 ROH 位点中,有 68 个被确定为常见位点。在受影响的个体中,非常见ROH的发生率相对较高,而且在非中心染色体、与常见三体相关的染色体和非印记染色体中的发生率也相对较高。此外,我们还观察到原始队列和复制队列中常见ROH位置的差异。我们的研究结果突出表明,在确定 ROH 报告临界值时,需要考虑特定人群的患病率和检测平台差异等因素,制定针对特定人群的指南。今后必须对更大规模的不同队列进行研究,以进一步了解ROH与医疗条件的关系,并相应地改进临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the human genomic landscape: patterns of common homozygosity regions in a large middle eastern cohort.

Regions of Homozygosity (ROH) typically reflect normal demographic history of a human population, but may also relate to cryptic consanguinity, and, additionally, have been associated with specific medical conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the location, size, and prevalence of common ROH segments in a Middle Eastern cohort. This retrospective study included 13 483 samples collected from all Chromosomal Microarray analyses (CMA) performed using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays at the genetic clinical laboratory of Rabin Medical Center between 2017-2023 (primary data set). An additional replication cohort including 100 842 samples from another SNP array platform, obtained from Maccabi Health Organization, was analyzed. Common ROH locations were defined as those ROH locations involving 1% or more of the samples. A total of 66 710 ROH segments, involving 13 035 samples (96.7%) were identified in the primary data set. Of the 4069 cytogenetic ROH locations, 68 were identified as common. The prevalence of non-common ROH was relatively high in affected individuals, and for acrocentric chromosomes, chromosomes associated with common trisomies, and non-imprinted chromosomes. In addition, differences in common ROH locations were observed between the primary and the replication cohorts. Our findings highlight the need for population-specific guidelines in determining ROH reporting cutoffs, considering factors such as population-specific prevalence and testing platform differences. Future research with larger, varied cohorts is essential to advance understanding of ROH's associations with medical conditions and to improve clinical practices accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信