{"title":"全身 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT 成像的低剂量优化:基于体重指数分层的单中心可行性研究。","authors":"Taoying Gu, Siwei Liu, Xiaoguang Hou, Liwei Zhao, Yee Ling Ng, Jingyi Wang, Hongcheng Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implementing personalization protocol in clinical routine necessitates diverse low-dose PET/CT scan protocols. This study explores the clinical feasibility of one-third (1/3) dose regimen and evaluates the diagnostic image quality and lesion detectability of BMI-based 1/3-injection doses for 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four cancer patients underwent total-body 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT examination, with 37 retrospectively enrolled as full-dose group (3.7 MBq/kg) and 37 prospectively enrolled as the 1/3-dose group (1.23 MBq/kg). The 1/3-dose group was stratified by BMI, with an acquisition time of 5 min (G5), 6 min (G6), and 8 min (G8) for BMI < 25, 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29, and BMI > 29, respectively. Image quality was subjectively and objectively assessed, and lesion detectability was quantitatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjective assessments of 1/3-dose and full-dose PET images showed strong agreement among readers (κ > 0.88). In the 1/3-dose group, the Likert scores were above 4. G5, G6, and G8 showed comparable image quality, with G5 demonstrating higher lesion conspicuity than G6 and G8 (p = 0.045). Objective evaluation showed no significant differences in SUV<sub>max</sub>, liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> and TBR between 1/3- and full-dose groups (p > 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in the SUV<sub>max</sub> of primary tumor, SUV<sub>mean</sub> of liver and TBR across all BMI categories between the 1/3-dose and full-dose groups. Lesion detection rates showed no significant difference between the 1/3-dose (93.24%, 193/207) and full-dose groups (94.73%, 198/209) (p = 0.520).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a feasible low-dose alternative with clinically acceptable lesion detectability equivalent to full-dose protocol, potentially expanding the applicability of personalized protocols.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This study demonstrated that BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimens for [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG total-body PET/CT yielded equivalent outputs compared to the full-dose regimen, which aligns with clinical needs for personalization in dose and BMI.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Currently, limited personalized low-dose total-body PET/CT protocols are available, particularly for patients with varied BMI. Reducing the radiotracer dose to 1/3 the standard demonstrated comparable image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to full dose. BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a clinically feasible low-dose alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1881-1893"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low dose optimization for total-body 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging: a single-center study on feasibility based on body mass index stratification.\",\"authors\":\"Taoying Gu, Siwei Liu, Xiaoguang Hou, Liwei Zhao, Yee Ling Ng, Jingyi Wang, Hongcheng Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implementing personalization protocol in clinical routine necessitates diverse low-dose PET/CT scan protocols. This study explores the clinical feasibility of one-third (1/3) dose regimen and evaluates the diagnostic image quality and lesion detectability of BMI-based 1/3-injection doses for 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four cancer patients underwent total-body 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT examination, with 37 retrospectively enrolled as full-dose group (3.7 MBq/kg) and 37 prospectively enrolled as the 1/3-dose group (1.23 MBq/kg). The 1/3-dose group was stratified by BMI, with an acquisition time of 5 min (G5), 6 min (G6), and 8 min (G8) for BMI < 25, 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29, and BMI > 29, respectively. Image quality was subjectively and objectively assessed, and lesion detectability was quantitatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjective assessments of 1/3-dose and full-dose PET images showed strong agreement among readers (κ > 0.88). In the 1/3-dose group, the Likert scores were above 4. G5, G6, and G8 showed comparable image quality, with G5 demonstrating higher lesion conspicuity than G6 and G8 (p = 0.045). Objective evaluation showed no significant differences in SUV<sub>max</sub>, liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> and TBR between 1/3- and full-dose groups (p > 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in the SUV<sub>max</sub> of primary tumor, SUV<sub>mean</sub> of liver and TBR across all BMI categories between the 1/3-dose and full-dose groups. Lesion detection rates showed no significant difference between the 1/3-dose (93.24%, 193/207) and full-dose groups (94.73%, 198/209) (p = 0.520).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a feasible low-dose alternative with clinically acceptable lesion detectability equivalent to full-dose protocol, potentially expanding the applicability of personalized protocols.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This study demonstrated that BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimens for [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG total-body PET/CT yielded equivalent outputs compared to the full-dose regimen, which aligns with clinical needs for personalization in dose and BMI.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Currently, limited personalized low-dose total-body PET/CT protocols are available, particularly for patients with varied BMI. Reducing the radiotracer dose to 1/3 the standard demonstrated comparable image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to full dose. BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a clinically feasible low-dose alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1881-1893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low dose optimization for total-body 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT imaging: a single-center study on feasibility based on body mass index stratification.
Objectives: Implementing personalization protocol in clinical routine necessitates diverse low-dose PET/CT scan protocols. This study explores the clinical feasibility of one-third (1/3) dose regimen and evaluates the diagnostic image quality and lesion detectability of BMI-based 1/3-injection doses for 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT imaging.
Methods: Seventy-four cancer patients underwent total-body 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT examination, with 37 retrospectively enrolled as full-dose group (3.7 MBq/kg) and 37 prospectively enrolled as the 1/3-dose group (1.23 MBq/kg). The 1/3-dose group was stratified by BMI, with an acquisition time of 5 min (G5), 6 min (G6), and 8 min (G8) for BMI < 25, 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29, and BMI > 29, respectively. Image quality was subjectively and objectively assessed, and lesion detectability was quantitatively analyzed.
Results: Subjective assessments of 1/3-dose and full-dose PET images showed strong agreement among readers (κ > 0.88). In the 1/3-dose group, the Likert scores were above 4. G5, G6, and G8 showed comparable image quality, with G5 demonstrating higher lesion conspicuity than G6 and G8 (p = 0.045). Objective evaluation showed no significant differences in SUVmax, liver SUVmean and TBR between 1/3- and full-dose groups (p > 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in the SUVmax of primary tumor, SUVmean of liver and TBR across all BMI categories between the 1/3-dose and full-dose groups. Lesion detection rates showed no significant difference between the 1/3-dose (93.24%, 193/207) and full-dose groups (94.73%, 198/209) (p = 0.520).
Conclusion: A BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a feasible low-dose alternative with clinically acceptable lesion detectability equivalent to full-dose protocol, potentially expanding the applicability of personalized protocols.
Clinical relevance statement: This study demonstrated that BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimens for [18F]FDG total-body PET/CT yielded equivalent outputs compared to the full-dose regimen, which aligns with clinical needs for personalization in dose and BMI.
Key points: Currently, limited personalized low-dose total-body PET/CT protocols are available, particularly for patients with varied BMI. Reducing the radiotracer dose to 1/3 the standard demonstrated comparable image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to full dose. BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a clinically feasible low-dose alternative.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.