不符合移植条件的肝硬化和急性肾损伤患者开始肾脏替代疗法后的预后。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Paige McLean Diaz, Danielle L Saly, Nora Horick, Romela Petrosyan, Zachary Gitto, Teresa Indriolo, Lucinda Li, Olivia Kahn-Boesel, John Donlan, Blair Robinson, Lindsay Dow, Annie Liu, Areej El-Jawahri, Xavier Vela Parada, Sara Combs, Joao Teixeira, Raymond Chung, Andrew S Allegretti, Nneka N Ufere
{"title":"不符合移植条件的肝硬化和急性肾损伤患者开始肾脏替代疗法后的预后。","authors":"Paige McLean Diaz, Danielle L Saly, Nora Horick, Romela Petrosyan, Zachary Gitto, Teresa Indriolo, Lucinda Li, Olivia Kahn-Boesel, John Donlan, Blair Robinson, Lindsay Dow, Annie Liu, Areej El-Jawahri, Xavier Vela Parada, Sara Combs, Joao Teixeira, Raymond Chung, Andrew S Allegretti, Nneka N Ufere","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08623-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28-0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognosis of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Who Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Paige McLean Diaz, Danielle L Saly, Nora Horick, Romela Petrosyan, Zachary Gitto, Teresa Indriolo, Lucinda Li, Olivia Kahn-Boesel, John Donlan, Blair Robinson, Lindsay Dow, Annie Liu, Areej El-Jawahri, Xavier Vela Parada, Sara Combs, Joao Teixeira, Raymond Chung, Andrew S Allegretti, Nneka N Ufere\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08623-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28-0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08623-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08623-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:我们旨在描述一家肝移植中心为符合移植条件的肝硬化患者启动肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的过程、预测因素和结果:我们采用混合方法对 2008 年至 2015 年间 372 例因肝肾综合征(HRS-AKI)或急性肾小管坏死(ATN)导致急性肾损伤(AKI)的不符合移植条件的肝硬化住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们进行了生存分析,以评估 6 个月生存率和肾功能恢复情况,并检查了生命末期护理结果。我们采用共识驱动的病历审查来描述启动 RRT 的过程:我们确定了266例(71.5%)接受RRT的患者和106例(28.5%)未接受RRT(非RRT)的患者。中位生存期为 12.5 天(RRT)对 2.0 天(非 RRT)(HR 0.36,95%CI 0.28-0.46);6 个月生存率为 15%(RRT)对 0%(非 RRT)。RRT患者更有可能死于重症监护室(88%对32%,P 结论:RRT患者更有可能死于重症监护室:大多数不符合移植条件的患者在开始接受 RRT 治疗后,短期内死亡率很高,并接受了重症生命末期护理。然而,大约六分之一的患者在 6 个月后仍然存活。我们的研究结果突显了对结构化临床流程的迫切需求,以支持针对这一人群的高质量重症沟通和 RRT 决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognosis of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Who Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy.

Prognosis of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Who Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy.

Background: Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking.

Aims: We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation.

Results: We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28-0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%).

Conclusion: Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信