湿疹的局部抗炎治疗:科克伦系统综述与网络元分析》(Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis)。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Stephanie J Lax, Eleanor Van Vogt, Bridget Candy, Lloyd Steele, Clare Reynolds, Beth Stuart, Roses Parker, Emma Axon, Amanda Roberts, Megan Doyle, Derek K Chu, Masaki Futamura, Miriam Santer, Hywel C Williams, Suzie Cro, Aaron M Drucker, Robert J Boyle
{"title":"湿疹的局部抗炎治疗:科克伦系统综述与网络元分析》(Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis)。","authors":"Stephanie J Lax, Eleanor Van Vogt, Bridget Candy, Lloyd Steele, Clare Reynolds, Beth Stuart, Roses Parker, Emma Axon, Amanda Roberts, Megan Doyle, Derek K Chu, Masaki Futamura, Miriam Santer, Hywel C Williams, Suzie Cro, Aaron M Drucker, Robert J Boyle","doi":"10.1111/cea.14556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eczema is the most burdensome skin condition worldwide and topical anti-inflammatory treatments are commonly used to control symptoms. The relative effectiveness and safety of different topical anti-inflammatory treatments is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Network meta-analysis performed within a Cochrane systematic review to compare and statistically rank efficacy and safety of topical anti-inflammatory eczema treatments.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selected trials: </strong>Included trials were within-participant or between-participant randomised controlled trials. Participants had eczema that was not clinically infected and was not contact dermatitis, seborrheic eczema or hand eczema. Interventions were topical anti-inflammatory treatments but not complementary treatments, antibiotics alone, wet wraps, phototherapy or systemic treatments. Comparators were no treatment/vehicle or another topical anti-inflammatory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 291 trials (45,846 participants), mainly in high-income countries. Most were industry-funded with median 3 weeks treatment duration. Risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was high in 89% of trials, mainly due to risk of selective reporting. Network meta-analysis of binary outcomes ranked potent and/or very potent topical steroids, tacrolimus 0.1% and ruxolitinib 1.5% among the most effective treatments for improving patient-reported symptoms (40 trials, all low confidence) and clinician-reported signs (32 trials, all moderate confidence). For investigator global assessment, the Janus kinas inhibitors ruxolitinib 1.5%, delgocitinib 0.5% or 0.25%, very potent/potent topical steroids and tacrolimus 0.1% were ranked as most effective (140 trials, all moderate confidence). Continuous outcome data were mixed. Local application site reactions were most common with tacrolimus 0.1% (moderate confidence) and crisaborole 2% (high confidence) and least common with topical steroids (moderate confidence). Skin thinning was not increased with short-term use of any topical steroid potency (low confidence) but skin thinning was reported in 6/2044 (0.3%) participants treated with longer-term (6-60 months) topical steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Potent topical steroids, Janus kinase inhibitors and tacrolimus 0.1% were consistently ranked as among the most effective topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical Anti-Inflammatory Treatments for Eczema: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie J Lax, Eleanor Van Vogt, Bridget Candy, Lloyd Steele, Clare Reynolds, Beth Stuart, Roses Parker, Emma Axon, Amanda Roberts, Megan Doyle, Derek K Chu, Masaki Futamura, Miriam Santer, Hywel C Williams, Suzie Cro, Aaron M Drucker, Robert J Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cea.14556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eczema is the most burdensome skin condition worldwide and topical anti-inflammatory treatments are commonly used to control symptoms. The relative effectiveness and safety of different topical anti-inflammatory treatments is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Network meta-analysis performed within a Cochrane systematic review to compare and statistically rank efficacy and safety of topical anti-inflammatory eczema treatments.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selected trials: </strong>Included trials were within-participant or between-participant randomised controlled trials. Participants had eczema that was not clinically infected and was not contact dermatitis, seborrheic eczema or hand eczema. Interventions were topical anti-inflammatory treatments but not complementary treatments, antibiotics alone, wet wraps, phototherapy or systemic treatments. Comparators were no treatment/vehicle or another topical anti-inflammatory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 291 trials (45,846 participants), mainly in high-income countries. Most were industry-funded with median 3 weeks treatment duration. Risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was high in 89% of trials, mainly due to risk of selective reporting. Network meta-analysis of binary outcomes ranked potent and/or very potent topical steroids, tacrolimus 0.1% and ruxolitinib 1.5% among the most effective treatments for improving patient-reported symptoms (40 trials, all low confidence) and clinician-reported signs (32 trials, all moderate confidence). For investigator global assessment, the Janus kinas inhibitors ruxolitinib 1.5%, delgocitinib 0.5% or 0.25%, very potent/potent topical steroids and tacrolimus 0.1% were ranked as most effective (140 trials, all moderate confidence). Continuous outcome data were mixed. Local application site reactions were most common with tacrolimus 0.1% (moderate confidence) and crisaborole 2% (high confidence) and least common with topical steroids (moderate confidence). Skin thinning was not increased with short-term use of any topical steroid potency (low confidence) but skin thinning was reported in 6/2044 (0.3%) participants treated with longer-term (6-60 months) topical steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Potent topical steroids, Janus kinase inhibitors and tacrolimus 0.1% were consistently ranked as among the most effective topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:湿疹是全球负担最重的皮肤病,外用消炎治疗常用于控制症状。不同外用消炎疗法的相对有效性和安全性尚不确定:设计:在 Cochrane 系统综述中进行网络荟萃分析,比较并统计外用消炎湿疹治疗方法的有效性和安全性:截至2023年6月的Cochrane皮肤专门登记、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和试验登记:纳入的试验均为参与者内部或参与者之间的随机对照试验。参与者的湿疹未受到临床感染,且不属于接触性皮炎、脂溢性湿疹或手部湿疹。干预措施包括局部消炎治疗,但不包括辅助治疗、单独使用抗生素、湿敷、光疗或全身治疗。比较对象为无治疗/药物或其他外用消炎药:我们发现了291项试验(45,846名参与者),主要集中在高收入国家。大多数试验由行业资助,中位治疗时间为 3 周。使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 工具对 89% 的试验进行了偏倚风险评估,结果显示偏倚风险较高,主要是由于选择性报告的风险。二元结果的网络荟萃分析将强效和/或特效局部类固醇激素、他克莫司0.1%和鲁索利替尼1.5%列为改善患者报告症状(40项试验,均为低置信度)和临床医生报告体征(32项试验,均为中等置信度)的最有效治疗方法。在研究者的总体评估中,Janus激酶抑制剂鲁索利替尼1.5%、delgocitinib 0.5%或0.25%、强效/强效局部类固醇和他克莫司0.1%被评为最有效的治疗方法(140项试验,置信度均为中等)。连续结果数据参差不齐。他克莫司 0.1%(中等可信度)和 crisaborole 2%(高度可信度)最常见的是局部涂抹部位反应,而局部类固醇(中等可信度)最不常见。短期使用任何外用类固醇药效的药物都不会导致皮肤变薄(置信度低),但有 6/2044 人(0.3%)在长期(6-60 个月)使用外用类固醇药物治疗时出现了皮肤变薄的情况:结论:强效外用类固醇激素、Janus 激酶抑制剂和 0.1% 他克莫司被一致评为治疗湿疹最有效的外用抗炎疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical Anti-Inflammatory Treatments for Eczema: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Eczema is the most burdensome skin condition worldwide and topical anti-inflammatory treatments are commonly used to control symptoms. The relative effectiveness and safety of different topical anti-inflammatory treatments is uncertain.

Design: Network meta-analysis performed within a Cochrane systematic review to compare and statistically rank efficacy and safety of topical anti-inflammatory eczema treatments.

Data sources: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries to June 2023.

Eligibility criteria for selected trials: Included trials were within-participant or between-participant randomised controlled trials. Participants had eczema that was not clinically infected and was not contact dermatitis, seborrheic eczema or hand eczema. Interventions were topical anti-inflammatory treatments but not complementary treatments, antibiotics alone, wet wraps, phototherapy or systemic treatments. Comparators were no treatment/vehicle or another topical anti-inflammatory.

Results: We identified 291 trials (45,846 participants), mainly in high-income countries. Most were industry-funded with median 3 weeks treatment duration. Risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was high in 89% of trials, mainly due to risk of selective reporting. Network meta-analysis of binary outcomes ranked potent and/or very potent topical steroids, tacrolimus 0.1% and ruxolitinib 1.5% among the most effective treatments for improving patient-reported symptoms (40 trials, all low confidence) and clinician-reported signs (32 trials, all moderate confidence). For investigator global assessment, the Janus kinas inhibitors ruxolitinib 1.5%, delgocitinib 0.5% or 0.25%, very potent/potent topical steroids and tacrolimus 0.1% were ranked as most effective (140 trials, all moderate confidence). Continuous outcome data were mixed. Local application site reactions were most common with tacrolimus 0.1% (moderate confidence) and crisaborole 2% (high confidence) and least common with topical steroids (moderate confidence). Skin thinning was not increased with short-term use of any topical steroid potency (low confidence) but skin thinning was reported in 6/2044 (0.3%) participants treated with longer-term (6-60 months) topical steroids.

Conclusion: Potent topical steroids, Janus kinase inhibitors and tacrolimus 0.1% were consistently ranked as among the most effective topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信