老年康复住院病人(GeRas)出院后多模式家庭康复干预的实施:早期定性过程评估。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Catharina Roth, Leonie Maier, Bastian Abel, Patrick Roigk, Kilian Rapp, Oliver Schmidberger, Martin Bongartz, Simone Maier, Isabel Wirth, Brigitte Metz, Désirée Immel, Benjamin Finger, Sabine Schölch, Gisela Büchele, Oliver Deuster, Hans-Helmut Koenig, Sophie Gottschalk, Judith Dams, William Micol, Jürgen M Bauer, Michel Wensing, Petra Benzinger
{"title":"老年康复住院病人(GeRas)出院后多模式家庭康复干预的实施:早期定性过程评估。","authors":"Catharina Roth, Leonie Maier, Bastian Abel, Patrick Roigk, Kilian Rapp, Oliver Schmidberger, Martin Bongartz, Simone Maier, Isabel Wirth, Brigitte Metz, Désirée Immel, Benjamin Finger, Sabine Schölch, Gisela Büchele, Oliver Deuster, Hans-Helmut Koenig, Sophie Gottschalk, Judith Dams, William Micol, Jürgen M Bauer, Michel Wensing, Petra Benzinger","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Catharina Roth, Leonie Maier, Bastian Abel, Patrick Roigk, Kilian Rapp, Oliver Schmidberger, Martin Bongartz, Simone Maier, Isabel Wirth, Brigitte Metz, Désirée Immel, Benjamin Finger, Sabine Schölch, Gisela Büchele, Oliver Deuster, Hans-Helmut Koenig, Sophie Gottschalk, Judith Dams, William Micol, Jürgen M Bauer, Michel Wensing, Petra Benzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年康复旨在增加老年人的体力和社交活动,维持其功能储备。然而,由于缺乏结构化的术后护理计划,门诊环境中老年康复的连续性受到了限制。为了克服这一问题,我们实施了一项为期三个月的多模式家庭干预计划(GeRas)。这项早期定性过程评估的目的是从接受干预的患者和参与提供干预的医疗服务提供者的角度,评估 GeRas 的感知范围、有效性/效力、采纳/吸收、实施和维持/可持续性(RE-AIM 框架内的领域):在定性过程评估中,使用半结构化访谈指南,对 GeRas 实施初期的 13 名医疗服务提供者和 10 名患者进行了访谈,以获取早期经验。访谈指南和定性内容分析以 RE-AIM 框架为指导:结果:医疗服务提供者和患者都认为 GeRas 计划在很大程度上得到了很好的实施并从中受益。医疗服务提供者认为,与常规护理相比,GeRas 显示出更多优势。此外,预期结果主要得到了满足(领域 1:有效性)。然而,通过电子健康系统实施干预措施被认为具有挑战性(领域 2:采用)。尽管如此,无论干预类型如何,门诊体育锻炼、门诊咨询和出院后的持续护理都提高了患者的幸福感(领域 3:实施)。为促进 GeRas 的持续使用,应制定技术要求以提高用户友好性,并激励患者长期持续接受培训(领域 4:维护):尽管GeRas的初步实施经验和有效性总体上是积极的,但仍需解决组织和技术问题,以加强GeRas计划的可持续和成功实施:德国临床试验注册(DRKS00029559)。注册日期:2022 年 10 月 5 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation.

Background: Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.

Methods: In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework.

Results: The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance).

Conclusion: Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信