慢性中风意向驱动机器人手训练后上肢运动恢复的运动意向综合预测模型的开发和外部验证

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Chengpeng Hu MSc , Chun Hang Eden Ti PhD , Xiangqian Shi MSc , Kai Yuan PhD , Thomas W.H. Leung MD , Raymond Kai-Yu Tong PhD
{"title":"慢性中风意向驱动机器人手训练后上肢运动恢复的运动意向综合预测模型的开发和外部验证","authors":"Chengpeng Hu MSc ,&nbsp;Chun Hang Eden Ti PhD ,&nbsp;Xiangqian Shi MSc ,&nbsp;Kai Yuan PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas W.H. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Raymond Kai-Yu Tong PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To derive and validate a prediction model for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in upper extremity (UE) motor function after intention-driven robotic hand training using residual voluntary electromyography (EMG) signals from affected UE.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A prospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. We collected preintervention candidate predictors: demographics, clinical characteristics, Fugl-Meyer assessment of UE (FMAUE), Action Research Arm Test scores, and motor intention of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum (ED) measured by EMG during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For EMG measures, recognizing challenges for stroke survivors to move paralyzed hand, peak signals were extracted from 8 time windows during MVC-EMG (0.1-5s) to identify subjects’ motor intention. Classification and regression tree algorithm was employed to predict survivors with MCID of FMAUE. Relationship between predictors and motor improvements was further investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Nine rehabilitation centers.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Chronic stroke survivors (N=131), including 87 for derivation sample, and 44 for validation sample.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>All participants underwent 20-session robotic hand training (40min/session, 3-5sessions/wk).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Prediction efficacies of models were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best effective model was final model and validated using AUC and overall accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best model comprised FMAUE (cutoff score, 46) and peak activity of ED from 1-second MVC-EMG (MVC-EMG 4.604 times higher than resting EMG), which demonstrated significantly higher prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.807) than other time windows or solely using clinical scores (AUC, 0.595). In external validation, this model displayed robust prediction (AUC, 0.916). Significant quadratic relationship was observed between ED-EMG and FMAUE increases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study presents a prediction model for intention-driven robotic hand training in chronic stroke survivors. It highlights significance of capturing motor intention through 1-second EMG window as a predictor for MCID improvement in UE motor function after 20-session robotic training. Survivors in 2 conditions showed high percentage of clinical motor improvement: moderate-to-high motor intention and low-to-moderate function; as well as high intention and high function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 2","pages":"Pages 206-215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and External Validation of a Motor Intention–Integrated Prediction Model for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Intention-Driven Robotic Hand Training for Chronic Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Chengpeng Hu MSc ,&nbsp;Chun Hang Eden Ti PhD ,&nbsp;Xiangqian Shi MSc ,&nbsp;Kai Yuan PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas W.H. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Raymond Kai-Yu Tong PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To derive and validate a prediction model for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in upper extremity (UE) motor function after intention-driven robotic hand training using residual voluntary electromyography (EMG) signals from affected UE.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A prospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. We collected preintervention candidate predictors: demographics, clinical characteristics, Fugl-Meyer assessment of UE (FMAUE), Action Research Arm Test scores, and motor intention of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum (ED) measured by EMG during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For EMG measures, recognizing challenges for stroke survivors to move paralyzed hand, peak signals were extracted from 8 time windows during MVC-EMG (0.1-5s) to identify subjects’ motor intention. Classification and regression tree algorithm was employed to predict survivors with MCID of FMAUE. Relationship between predictors and motor improvements was further investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Nine rehabilitation centers.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Chronic stroke survivors (N=131), including 87 for derivation sample, and 44 for validation sample.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>All participants underwent 20-session robotic hand training (40min/session, 3-5sessions/wk).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Prediction efficacies of models were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best effective model was final model and validated using AUC and overall accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best model comprised FMAUE (cutoff score, 46) and peak activity of ED from 1-second MVC-EMG (MVC-EMG 4.604 times higher than resting EMG), which demonstrated significantly higher prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.807) than other time windows or solely using clinical scores (AUC, 0.595). In external validation, this model displayed robust prediction (AUC, 0.916). Significant quadratic relationship was observed between ED-EMG and FMAUE increases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study presents a prediction model for intention-driven robotic hand training in chronic stroke survivors. It highlights significance of capturing motor intention through 1-second EMG window as a predictor for MCID improvement in UE motor function after 20-session robotic training. Survivors in 2 conditions showed high percentage of clinical motor improvement: moderate-to-high motor intention and low-to-moderate function; as well as high intention and high function.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"106 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 206-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324011948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324011948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用受影响上肢的残余自主肌电信号,推导并验证意向驱动机械手训练后上肢运动功能最小临床重要差异(MCID)的预测模型:设计:一项前瞻性纵向多中心队列研究。我们收集了干预前的候选预测因素:人口统计学、临床特征、Fugl-Meyer UE 评估(FMAUE)、行动研究手臂测试评分,以及最大自主收缩(MVC)时通过肌电图测量的屈指肌和伸指肌(ED)的运动意向。在肌电图测量中,考虑到中风幸存者在移动瘫痪手时面临的挑战,我们从最大自主收缩过程中的八个时间窗口(0.1 秒至 5 秒)中提取峰值信号,以识别受试者的运动意向。采用分类和回归树算法预测幸存者的运动意向,MCID 为 FMAUE。进一步研究了预测因子与运动改善之间的关系:九个康复中心:慢性中风幸存者(131 人),其中 87 人为推导样本,44 人为验证样本:干预措施:所有参与者接受 20 次机器人手训练(40 分钟/次,3-5 次/周):通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型的预测效果。最佳有效模型为最终模型,并通过AUC和总体准确性进行验证:最佳模型由 FMAUE(截断分数:46)和一秒 MVC-EMG 的 ED 峰值活动(MVC-EMG 比静息-EMG 高 4.604 倍)组成,其预测准确率(AUC:0.807)明显高于其他时间窗口或仅使用临床评分(AUC:0.595)。在外部验证中,该模型显示出强大的预测能力(AUC:0.916)。在 ED-EMG 和 FMAUE 的增加之间观察到了显著的二次关系:本研究提出了慢性中风幸存者意向驱动机器人手训练的预测模型。它强调了通过 1 秒肌电图窗口捕捉运动意向作为 20 次机器人训练后 UE 运动功能 MCID 改善的预测因子的重要性。在两种情况下,幸存者的临床运动改善比例较高:中度至高度运动意向和低度至中度功能;以及高度意向和高度功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and External Validation of a Motor Intention–Integrated Prediction Model for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Intention-Driven Robotic Hand Training for Chronic Stroke

Objective

To derive and validate a prediction model for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in upper extremity (UE) motor function after intention-driven robotic hand training using residual voluntary electromyography (EMG) signals from affected UE.

Design

A prospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. We collected preintervention candidate predictors: demographics, clinical characteristics, Fugl-Meyer assessment of UE (FMAUE), Action Research Arm Test scores, and motor intention of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum (ED) measured by EMG during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For EMG measures, recognizing challenges for stroke survivors to move paralyzed hand, peak signals were extracted from 8 time windows during MVC-EMG (0.1-5s) to identify subjects’ motor intention. Classification and regression tree algorithm was employed to predict survivors with MCID of FMAUE. Relationship between predictors and motor improvements was further investigated.

Setting

Nine rehabilitation centers.

Participants

Chronic stroke survivors (N=131), including 87 for derivation sample, and 44 for validation sample.

Interventions

All participants underwent 20-session robotic hand training (40min/session, 3-5sessions/wk).

Main Outcome Measures

Prediction efficacies of models were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best effective model was final model and validated using AUC and overall accuracy.

Results

The best model comprised FMAUE (cutoff score, 46) and peak activity of ED from 1-second MVC-EMG (MVC-EMG 4.604 times higher than resting EMG), which demonstrated significantly higher prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.807) than other time windows or solely using clinical scores (AUC, 0.595). In external validation, this model displayed robust prediction (AUC, 0.916). Significant quadratic relationship was observed between ED-EMG and FMAUE increases.

Conclusions

This study presents a prediction model for intention-driven robotic hand training in chronic stroke survivors. It highlights significance of capturing motor intention through 1-second EMG window as a predictor for MCID improvement in UE motor function after 20-session robotic training. Survivors in 2 conditions showed high percentage of clinical motor improvement: moderate-to-high motor intention and low-to-moderate function; as well as high intention and high function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信