用咨询和抗抑郁药物治疗产前抑郁症与早产的效果比较。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos
{"title":"用咨询和抗抑郁药物治疗产前抑郁症与早产的效果比较。","authors":"De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of treating prenatal depression with counseling versus antidepressants in relation to preterm delivery.\",\"authors\":\"De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期产妇抑郁症很普遍,而且与早产(PTD)风险增加有关。然而,心理健康咨询和使用抗抑郁药这两种常用治疗方案在降低与孕产妇抑郁相关的早产风险方面的比较效果仍不确定。虽然在之前的许多研究中,抗抑郁药的使用与 PTD 风险的增加有关,但这两种治疗方案之间的直接正面比较尚未进行过调查。因此,这两种治疗方案的风险-效益对比情况仍不清楚:研究设计:研究设计:一项大型前瞻性队列研究在综合医疗服务系统 Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) 的 82170 名孕妇中展开。临床诊断出的抑郁症及其治疗(使用抗抑郁药和心理健康咨询)均来自 KPNC 电子健康记录系统 (EHR)。电子病历还记录了所有分娩的妊娠年龄,以确定PTD:使用结合倾向评分方法的考克斯比例危险回归法确保比较队列之间的可比性,与未患抑郁症的孕妇相比,患抑郁症的孕妇患 PTD 的风险增加了 41%:调整后危险比 (aHR)=1.41, 95% 置信区间 (CI)=1.24-1.60, 证实了与潜在产妇抑郁症相关的 PTD 风险增加。相对于未经治疗的抑郁症,任何心理健康咨询都会使患 PTD 的风险降低 18%:aHR=0.82(0.71-0.96)。这种反向关联呈现出剂量-反应模式:心理咨询次数的增加与PTD风险的进一步降低有关,4次或更多次心理咨询可使PTD风险降低43%(aHR=0.57,95% CI=0.45-0.73)。相比之下,在怀孕期间使用抗抑郁药会使PTD风险增加31%,与潜在抑郁无关:aHR=1.31,95% CI=1.06-1.61。这种正相关还表现出剂量反应关系:用药时间越长,风险越高:本研究为产前抑郁症的两种常见治疗方案在PTD风险方面的比较效果提供了急需的证据。结果表明,要降低因产妇抑郁而导致的先天性心脏病风险,心理健康咨询更为有效。使用抗抑郁药可能会增加患 PTD 的风险,与潜在的抑郁症无关。研究结果为临床医生和孕妇提供了数据,以便他们在考虑到对母体和胎儿健康的风险和益处的情况下,做出知情的、以证据为基础的治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of treating prenatal depression with counseling versus antidepressants in relation to preterm delivery.

Background: Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.

Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.

Study design: A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.

Results: Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.

Conclusion: This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信