De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos
{"title":"用咨询和抗抑郁药物治疗产前抑郁症与早产的效果比较。","authors":"De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of treating prenatal depression with counseling versus antidepressants in relation to preterm delivery.\",\"authors\":\"De-Kun Li, Jeannette R Ferber, Roxana Odouli, Charles Quesenberry, Lyndsay Avalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of treating prenatal depression with counseling versus antidepressants in relation to preterm delivery.
Background: Maternal depression during pregnancy is prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. However, comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used treatment options, mental health counseling and use of antidepressants, in mitigating the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression remains uncertain. Although antidepressant use has been associated with increased risk of preterm delivery in many previous studies, a direct head-to-head comparison between these 2 treatment options has not been investigated. Thus, the comparative risk-benefit profiles of those 2 treatment options remain unclear.
Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness of 2 commonly used options for treating prenatal depression in limiting the risk of preterm delivery associated with maternal depression.
Study design: A large prospective cohort study was conducted among 82,170 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Clinically diagnosed depression and its treatments (use of antidepressants and mental health counseling) were identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California electronic health record system. Gestational age was also recorded for all deliveries and captured by electronic health records for determining preterm delivery.
Results: Using Cox proportional hazards regression incorporating propensity score methodology to ensure comparability between comparison cohorts, relative to those without depression, pregnant women with untreated depression had 41% increased risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=1.41, 95% confidence interval=1.24 to 1.60, confirming increased risk of preterm delivery associated underlying maternal depression. Relative to untreated depression, any mental health counseling was associated with an 18% of reduced risk of preterm delivery: adjusted hazard ratio=0.82 (0.71-0.96). The inverse association showed a dose-response pattern: increased number of counseling visits was associated with greater reduction in preterm delivery risk with 43% reduction in preterm delivery risk associated with 4 or more visits (adjusted hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval=0.45-0.73). In contrast, use of antidepressants during pregnancy was associated with an additional 31% increased risk of preterm delivery independent of underlying depression: adjusted hazard ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.06 to 1.61. This positive association also showed a dose-response relationship: a longer duration of use was associated with an even higher risk.
Conclusion: This study provides much needed evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of 2 common treatment options for prenatal depression in the context of preterm delivery risk. The results indicate that, to reduce preterm delivery risk due to maternal depression, mental health counseling is more effective. Use of antidepressants may add additional risk of preterm delivery, independent of the underlying depression. The findings provide data for clinicians and pregnant women to make informed and evidence-based treatment decisions that take into account the risks and benefits to both maternal and fetal health.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.