孕妇热浪风险评估量表和项目的开发、验证和可靠性。

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Ashish KC, Sujeena Maharjan, Omkar Basnet, Honey Malla, Rejina Gurung, Sunil Mani Pokharel, Gyanu Kumari Ghimire, Masoud Vaezghasemi, Julia Schröders
{"title":"孕妇热浪风险评估量表和项目的开发、验证和可靠性。","authors":"Ashish KC,&nbsp;Sujeena Maharjan,&nbsp;Omkar Basnet,&nbsp;Honey Malla,&nbsp;Rejina Gurung,&nbsp;Sunil Mani Pokharel,&nbsp;Gyanu Kumari Ghimire,&nbsp;Masoud Vaezghasemi,&nbsp;Julia Schröders","doi":"10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introduction: The 1.2 °C rise of global ambient temperature since the pre-industrial era has led to an increase the intensity and frequency of heatwaves. Given the heightened vulnerability of pregnant women to heat stress, there is an urgent need for tools which accurately assess the knowledge, risk, and perception of pregnant woman toward heatwaves, enabling effective policy actions. In this research, we developed and validated tools to evaluate pregnant women’s perceptions of heat wave risks and behaviors. Method: We developed 50 items across seven constructs using the Health Belief Model, identified through a systematic literature review. The constructs comprised 8 Knowledge(K) items, 4 in Perceived Vulnerability (PV), 5 in Perceived Severity (PS), 6 in Perceived Benefit (PB), 4 in Perceived Barrier (PBa), 5 in Cue to Action(Cu) and 18 in Adaptation(A). Cognitive testing was performed with a separate group of pregnant women(<i>n</i> = 20). The tested tools were then administered to 120 pregnant women residing during the spring-summer 2023. Construct validation utilized exploratory factor analysis. Results: The Principal Axis Factoring Method was employed in the EFA with oblimin rotation for 51 items, considering communality &gt; 0.20, and aiming to extract three factors. Across the three factors with Cronbach’s alpha &gt; 0.70, a total of 11 items were distributed. Factor 1 included Perceived Severity (PS1, PS2, PS3 and PS5); Factor 2 included Cue to Action (Cu1, Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4); and Factor 3 encompassed Perceived Vulnerability (PV1, PV2, PV4). Only two of the retained items had factor loadings &gt; 0.50, namely PV4 and PS5. Consequently, the three constructs measuring Perceived Severity, Cues to Action, and Perceived Vulnerability using the HBM among pregnant women were deemed valid. Conclusion: Our study has successfully validated a highly reliable tool which stands ready for application in assessing pregnant women’s risk perception regarding heatwaves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":588,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biometeorology","volume":"68 11","pages":"2205 - 2214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, validation and reliability of scales and items for heat wave risk assessment of pregnant women\",\"authors\":\"Ashish KC,&nbsp;Sujeena Maharjan,&nbsp;Omkar Basnet,&nbsp;Honey Malla,&nbsp;Rejina Gurung,&nbsp;Sunil Mani Pokharel,&nbsp;Gyanu Kumari Ghimire,&nbsp;Masoud Vaezghasemi,&nbsp;Julia Schröders\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Introduction: The 1.2 °C rise of global ambient temperature since the pre-industrial era has led to an increase the intensity and frequency of heatwaves. Given the heightened vulnerability of pregnant women to heat stress, there is an urgent need for tools which accurately assess the knowledge, risk, and perception of pregnant woman toward heatwaves, enabling effective policy actions. In this research, we developed and validated tools to evaluate pregnant women’s perceptions of heat wave risks and behaviors. Method: We developed 50 items across seven constructs using the Health Belief Model, identified through a systematic literature review. The constructs comprised 8 Knowledge(K) items, 4 in Perceived Vulnerability (PV), 5 in Perceived Severity (PS), 6 in Perceived Benefit (PB), 4 in Perceived Barrier (PBa), 5 in Cue to Action(Cu) and 18 in Adaptation(A). Cognitive testing was performed with a separate group of pregnant women(<i>n</i> = 20). The tested tools were then administered to 120 pregnant women residing during the spring-summer 2023. Construct validation utilized exploratory factor analysis. Results: The Principal Axis Factoring Method was employed in the EFA with oblimin rotation for 51 items, considering communality &gt; 0.20, and aiming to extract three factors. Across the three factors with Cronbach’s alpha &gt; 0.70, a total of 11 items were distributed. Factor 1 included Perceived Severity (PS1, PS2, PS3 and PS5); Factor 2 included Cue to Action (Cu1, Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4); and Factor 3 encompassed Perceived Vulnerability (PV1, PV2, PV4). Only two of the retained items had factor loadings &gt; 0.50, namely PV4 and PS5. Consequently, the three constructs measuring Perceived Severity, Cues to Action, and Perceived Vulnerability using the HBM among pregnant women were deemed valid. Conclusion: Our study has successfully validated a highly reliable tool which stands ready for application in assessing pregnant women’s risk perception regarding heatwaves.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biometeorology\",\"volume\":\"68 11\",\"pages\":\"2205 - 2214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biometeorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-024-02738-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:自前工业化时代以来,全球环境温度上升了 1.2 °C,导致热浪的强度和频率增加。由于孕妇更容易受到热应激的影响,因此迫切需要能够准确评估孕妇对热浪的知识、风险和感知的工具,以便采取有效的政策行动。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了评估孕妇对热浪风险和行为认知的工具:方法:我们利用健康信念模型开发了 50 个项目,涵盖 7 个构面,这些构面是通过系统性文献回顾确定的。这些构念包括 8 个知识(K)项目、4 个感知脆弱性(PV)项目、5 个感知严重性(PS)项目、6 个感知益处(PB)项目、4 个感知障碍(PBa)项目、5 个行动提示(Cu)项目和 18 个适应(A)项目。对另一组孕妇(20 人)进行了认知测试。然后,对居住在 2023 年春夏间的 120 名孕妇进行了工具测试。利用探索性因子分析进行了结构验证:在 EFA 中采用了主轴因子分析法,对 51 个项目进行了顺反旋转,考虑到共性大于 0.20,旨在提取三个因子。在 Cronbach's alpha > 0.70 的三个因子中,共分布了 11 个项目。因子 1 包括感知严重性(PS1、PS2、PS3 和 PS5);因子 2 包括行动提示(Cu1、Cu2、Cu3 和 Cu4);因子 3 包括感知脆弱性(PV1、PV2 和 PV4)。在保留的项目中,只有两个项目的因子负荷大于 0.50,即 PV4 和 PS5。因此,在孕妇中使用 HBM 测量感知严重性、行动线索和感知脆弱性的三个结构被认为是有效的:我们的研究成功验证了一种高度可靠的工具,可用于评估孕妇对热浪的风险感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development, validation and reliability of scales and items for heat wave risk assessment of pregnant women

Development, validation and reliability of scales and items for heat wave risk assessment of pregnant women

Introduction: The 1.2 °C rise of global ambient temperature since the pre-industrial era has led to an increase the intensity and frequency of heatwaves. Given the heightened vulnerability of pregnant women to heat stress, there is an urgent need for tools which accurately assess the knowledge, risk, and perception of pregnant woman toward heatwaves, enabling effective policy actions. In this research, we developed and validated tools to evaluate pregnant women’s perceptions of heat wave risks and behaviors. Method: We developed 50 items across seven constructs using the Health Belief Model, identified through a systematic literature review. The constructs comprised 8 Knowledge(K) items, 4 in Perceived Vulnerability (PV), 5 in Perceived Severity (PS), 6 in Perceived Benefit (PB), 4 in Perceived Barrier (PBa), 5 in Cue to Action(Cu) and 18 in Adaptation(A). Cognitive testing was performed with a separate group of pregnant women(n = 20). The tested tools were then administered to 120 pregnant women residing during the spring-summer 2023. Construct validation utilized exploratory factor analysis. Results: The Principal Axis Factoring Method was employed in the EFA with oblimin rotation for 51 items, considering communality > 0.20, and aiming to extract three factors. Across the three factors with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70, a total of 11 items were distributed. Factor 1 included Perceived Severity (PS1, PS2, PS3 and PS5); Factor 2 included Cue to Action (Cu1, Cu2, Cu3, and Cu4); and Factor 3 encompassed Perceived Vulnerability (PV1, PV2, PV4). Only two of the retained items had factor loadings > 0.50, namely PV4 and PS5. Consequently, the three constructs measuring Perceived Severity, Cues to Action, and Perceived Vulnerability using the HBM among pregnant women were deemed valid. Conclusion: Our study has successfully validated a highly reliable tool which stands ready for application in assessing pregnant women’s risk perception regarding heatwaves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
183
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles and short communications on studies examining the interactions between living organisms and factors of the natural and artificial atmospheric environment. Living organisms extend from single cell organisms, to plants and animals, including humans. The atmospheric environment includes climate and weather, electromagnetic radiation, and chemical and biological pollutants. The journal embraces basic and applied research and practical aspects such as living conditions, agriculture, forestry, and health. The journal is published for the International Society of Biometeorology, and most membership categories include a subscription to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信