弹性梯度对三层修复系统抗断裂性的影响。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Luciano Madeira , Katia R. Weber , Natan Carpenedo , Yu Zhang , Thiago S. Porto , Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira , Carla C. Gonzaga , Marina R. Kaizer
{"title":"弹性梯度对三层修复系统抗断裂性的影响。","authors":"Luciano Madeira ,&nbsp;Katia R. Weber ,&nbsp;Natan Carpenedo ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Thiago S. Porto ,&nbsp;Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira ,&nbsp;Carla C. Gonzaga ,&nbsp;Marina R. Kaizer","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the impact of elastic gradients formed among restorative material, cement, and substrate on the fracture resistance of tri-layer restorative systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four CAD/CAM materials were utilized, two glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity) and two resin-ceramic hybrids (Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate). Their fracture resistance was examined by biaxial flexure (<em>n</em> = 8) and Hertzian indentation (<em>n</em> = 10) tests. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 5 %). Finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to simulate the Hertzian indentation test and elucidate the stress-fields formed on the intaglio surface below the loading area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The biaxial flexural strength (MPa) of glass-ceramics exceeded the hybrid materials (e.max 417<sup>a</sup>, Suprinity 230<sup>b</sup>, Enamic 138<sup>c</sup>, and Lava Ultimate 183<sup>bc</sup>). Conversely, the load-bearing capacity (N) of the materials bonded to dentin analog demonstrated the opposite trend, with the hybrid materials achieving superior results (e.max 830 <sup>C</sup>, Suprinity 660<sup>D</sup>, Enamic 1822<sup>B</sup>, and Lava Ultimate 2593 <sup>A</sup>). The stress-fields observed by FEA were coherent with the experimental results for Hertzian flexural stresses (MPa): e.max 501 <sup>A</sup>, Suprinity 342 <sup>C</sup>, Enamic 406<sup>B</sup>, whereas no tensile stress was observed at the intaglio surface of Lava Ultimate.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Detailed analysis of the fracture resistance of the tri-layer restorative systems showed that the elastic gradients play a more significant role than the flexural strength of the restorative materials. The coherence of the elastic moduli between the restorative material and supporting structures results in reduced tensile stress concentration at the intaglio surface beneath the loading area and enhances the ability to withstand load.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":"40 11","pages":"Pages 1862-1871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of elastic gradients on the fracture resistance of tri-layer restorative systems\",\"authors\":\"Luciano Madeira ,&nbsp;Katia R. Weber ,&nbsp;Natan Carpenedo ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Thiago S. Porto ,&nbsp;Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira ,&nbsp;Carla C. Gonzaga ,&nbsp;Marina R. Kaizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dental.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the impact of elastic gradients formed among restorative material, cement, and substrate on the fracture resistance of tri-layer restorative systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four CAD/CAM materials were utilized, two glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity) and two resin-ceramic hybrids (Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate). Their fracture resistance was examined by biaxial flexure (<em>n</em> = 8) and Hertzian indentation (<em>n</em> = 10) tests. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 5 %). Finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to simulate the Hertzian indentation test and elucidate the stress-fields formed on the intaglio surface below the loading area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The biaxial flexural strength (MPa) of glass-ceramics exceeded the hybrid materials (e.max 417<sup>a</sup>, Suprinity 230<sup>b</sup>, Enamic 138<sup>c</sup>, and Lava Ultimate 183<sup>bc</sup>). Conversely, the load-bearing capacity (N) of the materials bonded to dentin analog demonstrated the opposite trend, with the hybrid materials achieving superior results (e.max 830 <sup>C</sup>, Suprinity 660<sup>D</sup>, Enamic 1822<sup>B</sup>, and Lava Ultimate 2593 <sup>A</sup>). The stress-fields observed by FEA were coherent with the experimental results for Hertzian flexural stresses (MPa): e.max 501 <sup>A</sup>, Suprinity 342 <sup>C</sup>, Enamic 406<sup>B</sup>, whereas no tensile stress was observed at the intaglio surface of Lava Ultimate.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Detailed analysis of the fracture resistance of the tri-layer restorative systems showed that the elastic gradients play a more significant role than the flexural strength of the restorative materials. The coherence of the elastic moduli between the restorative material and supporting structures results in reduced tensile stress concentration at the intaglio surface beneath the loading area and enhances the ability to withstand load.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Materials\",\"volume\":\"40 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1862-1871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002525\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估修复材料、粘接剂和基底之间形成的弹性梯度对三层修复系统抗折性的影响:使用了四种 CAD/CAM 材料,两种玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD、Vita Suprinity)和两种树脂陶瓷混合材料(Vita Enamic、Lava Ultimate)。它们的抗断裂性通过双轴挠曲(8 个)和赫兹压痕(10 个)测试进行检验。统计分析采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验(p = 5 %)。采用有限元分析(FEA)模拟赫兹压痕测试,并阐明加载区域下方凹版表面形成的应力场:结果:玻璃陶瓷的双轴抗弯强度(兆帕)超过了混合材料(e.max 417a、Suprinity 230b、Enamic 138c 和 Lava Ultimate 183bc)。相反,与牙本质类比粘结的材料的承重能力(牛顿)却呈现出相反的趋势,混合材料的承重能力更胜一筹(e.max 830 C、Suprinity 660D、Enamic 1822B 和 Lava Ultimate 2593 A)。有限元分析观察到的应力场与赫兹弯曲应力(兆帕)的实验结果一致:e.max 501 A、Suprinity 342 C、Enamic 406B,而在 Lava Ultimate 的凹版表面没有观察到拉伸应力:对三层修复系统抗折性能的详细分析表明,弹性梯度比修复材料的抗折强度起着更为重要的作用。修复材料和支持结构之间弹性模量的一致性可减少加载区域下方凹面的拉应力集中,并增强承受负荷的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of elastic gradients on the fracture resistance of tri-layer restorative systems

Objectives

To assess the impact of elastic gradients formed among restorative material, cement, and substrate on the fracture resistance of tri-layer restorative systems.

Methods

Four CAD/CAM materials were utilized, two glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity) and two resin-ceramic hybrids (Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate). Their fracture resistance was examined by biaxial flexure (n = 8) and Hertzian indentation (n = 10) tests. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 5 %). Finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to simulate the Hertzian indentation test and elucidate the stress-fields formed on the intaglio surface below the loading area.

Results

The biaxial flexural strength (MPa) of glass-ceramics exceeded the hybrid materials (e.max 417a, Suprinity 230b, Enamic 138c, and Lava Ultimate 183bc). Conversely, the load-bearing capacity (N) of the materials bonded to dentin analog demonstrated the opposite trend, with the hybrid materials achieving superior results (e.max 830 C, Suprinity 660D, Enamic 1822B, and Lava Ultimate 2593 A). The stress-fields observed by FEA were coherent with the experimental results for Hertzian flexural stresses (MPa): e.max 501 A, Suprinity 342 C, Enamic 406B, whereas no tensile stress was observed at the intaglio surface of Lava Ultimate.

Significance

Detailed analysis of the fracture resistance of the tri-layer restorative systems showed that the elastic gradients play a more significant role than the flexural strength of the restorative materials. The coherence of the elastic moduli between the restorative material and supporting structures results in reduced tensile stress concentration at the intaglio surface beneath the loading area and enhances the ability to withstand load.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信