临床执业医师的老年病评估:为什么、做什么、怎么做

IF 503.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Allison Magnuson, Kah Poh Loh, Fiona Stauffer, William Dale, Nikesha Gilmore, Sindhuja Kadambi, Heidi D. Klepin, Kaitlin Kyi, Lisa M. Lowenstein, Tanyanika Phillips, Erika Ramsdale, Melody K. Schiaffino, John F. Simmons, Grant R. Williams, Jason Zittel, Supriya Mohile
{"title":"临床执业医师的老年病评估:为什么、做什么、怎么做","authors":"Allison Magnuson, Kah Poh Loh, Fiona Stauffer, William Dale, Nikesha Gilmore, Sindhuja Kadambi, Heidi D. Klepin, Kaitlin Kyi, Lisa M. Lowenstein, Tanyanika Phillips, Erika Ramsdale, Melody K. Schiaffino, John F. Simmons, Grant R. Williams, Jason Zittel, Supriya Mohile","doi":"10.3322/caac.21864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults with cancer heterogeneously experience health care, treatment, and symptoms. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status and can predict cancer-related outcomes in individuals with solid tumors and those with hematologic malignancies. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of GA and GA management (GAM), which uses GA information to provide tailored intervention strategies to address GA impairments (e.g., implementing physical therapy for impaired physical function). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials in older adults with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies have demonstrated that GAM improves treatment completion, quality of life, communication, and advance care planning while reducing treatment-related toxicity, falls, and polypharmacy. Nonetheless, implementation and uptake of GAM remain challenging. Various strategies have been proposed, including the use of GA screening tools, to identify patients most likely to benefit from GAM, the systematic engagement of the oncology workforce in the delivery of GAM, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine and mobile health to enhance the availability of GA and GAM interventions. Health inequities in minoritized groups persist, and systematic GA implementation has the potential to capture social determinants of health that are relevant to equitable care. Caregivers play an important role in cancer care and experience burden themselves. GA can guide dyadic supportive care interventions, ultimately helping both patients and caregivers achieve optimal health.","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":503.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how\",\"authors\":\"Allison Magnuson, Kah Poh Loh, Fiona Stauffer, William Dale, Nikesha Gilmore, Sindhuja Kadambi, Heidi D. Klepin, Kaitlin Kyi, Lisa M. Lowenstein, Tanyanika Phillips, Erika Ramsdale, Melody K. Schiaffino, John F. Simmons, Grant R. Williams, Jason Zittel, Supriya Mohile\",\"doi\":\"10.3322/caac.21864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Older adults with cancer heterogeneously experience health care, treatment, and symptoms. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status and can predict cancer-related outcomes in individuals with solid tumors and those with hematologic malignancies. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of GA and GA management (GAM), which uses GA information to provide tailored intervention strategies to address GA impairments (e.g., implementing physical therapy for impaired physical function). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials in older adults with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies have demonstrated that GAM improves treatment completion, quality of life, communication, and advance care planning while reducing treatment-related toxicity, falls, and polypharmacy. Nonetheless, implementation and uptake of GAM remain challenging. Various strategies have been proposed, including the use of GA screening tools, to identify patients most likely to benefit from GAM, the systematic engagement of the oncology workforce in the delivery of GAM, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine and mobile health to enhance the availability of GA and GAM interventions. Health inequities in minoritized groups persist, and systematic GA implementation has the potential to capture social determinants of health that are relevant to equitable care. Caregivers play an important role in cancer care and experience burden themselves. GA can guide dyadic supportive care interventions, ultimately helping both patients and caregivers achieve optimal health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":503.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21864\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21864","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年癌症患者在医疗保健、治疗和症状方面的经历各不相同。老年医学评估(GA)可对老年人的健康状况进行全面评估,并可预测实体瘤患者和血液恶性肿瘤患者的癌症相关预后。在过去的十年中,随机对照试验证明了老年医学评估和老年医学管理(GAM)的益处,老年医学管理利用老年医学评估信息提供量身定制的干预策略,以解决老年医学评估的缺陷(例如,针对受损的身体功能实施物理治疗)。在患有实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤的老年人中开展的多项三期临床试验表明,GAM 可改善治疗完成度、生活质量、沟通和预先护理计划,同时减少治疗相关毒性、跌倒和多重用药。然而,GAM 的实施和普及仍面临挑战。人们提出了各种策略,包括使用GA筛查工具来识别最有可能从GAM中获益的患者,让肿瘤科工作人员系统地参与GAM的实施,以及整合远程医疗和移动医疗等技术来提高GA和GAM干预措施的可用性。少数群体的健康不平等现象依然存在,系统性地实施性别问题评估有可能捕捉到与公平护理相关的健康社会决定因素。护理人员在癌症护理中扮演着重要角色,他们自身也承受着负担。性别问题可以指导双向支持性护理干预,最终帮助患者和护理人员达到最佳健康状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how
Older adults with cancer heterogeneously experience health care, treatment, and symptoms. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status and can predict cancer-related outcomes in individuals with solid tumors and those with hematologic malignancies. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of GA and GA management (GAM), which uses GA information to provide tailored intervention strategies to address GA impairments (e.g., implementing physical therapy for impaired physical function). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials in older adults with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies have demonstrated that GAM improves treatment completion, quality of life, communication, and advance care planning while reducing treatment-related toxicity, falls, and polypharmacy. Nonetheless, implementation and uptake of GAM remain challenging. Various strategies have been proposed, including the use of GA screening tools, to identify patients most likely to benefit from GAM, the systematic engagement of the oncology workforce in the delivery of GAM, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine and mobile health to enhance the availability of GA and GAM interventions. Health inequities in minoritized groups persist, and systematic GA implementation has the potential to capture social determinants of health that are relevant to equitable care. Caregivers play an important role in cancer care and experience burden themselves. GA can guide dyadic supportive care interventions, ultimately helping both patients and caregivers achieve optimal health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
873.20
自引率
0.10%
发文量
51
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians" has been published by the American Cancer Society since 1950, making it one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals in oncology. It maintains the highest impact factor among all ISI-ranked journals. The journal effectively reaches a broad and diverse audience of health professionals, offering a unique platform to disseminate information on cancer prevention, early detection, various treatment modalities, palliative care, advocacy matters, quality-of-life topics, and more. As the premier journal of the American Cancer Society, it publishes mission-driven content that significantly influences patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信